Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Advantages of intra-capsular micro-enucleation of schwannoma arising from extremities

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Schwannoma is the most common tumor of the peripheral nerves, with surgical enucleation being the established treatment modality. However, some schwannomas cannot be easily enucleated and this sometimes results in iatrogenic nerve injury even with atraumatic procedures. Here we present a retrospective review of the management of schwannoma in the extremities and compare clinical outcomes from the two techniques of extra-capsular and intra-capsular enucleation.

Methods

We reviewed 36 schwannomas from 35 patients who underwent surgical excision of schwannomas arising from the extremities. Twenty had undergone extra-capsular resection and 16 had undergone enucleation using the intra-capsular technique. The post-operative neurological deficits were graded as minor, major, and transient. The duration of symptoms, maximum tumor diameter and site of occurrence were compared between patients with the three grades of deficit.

Results

In total, 22 patients developed no sensory changes following enucleation of schwannoma or only temporary and minor changes that had fully resolved within 6 months. Ten patients developed new neurological deficits following surgery that took longer than 6 months to resolve. Four patients experienced new motor deficits or paresthesia following operation that had still not recovered at the final follow-up, all of whom underwent enucleation using the extra-capsular technique. Neurological deficit after enucleation was significantly lower using the intra-capsular compared with the extra-capsular technique. Patient age, duration of symptoms, maximum diameter of the tumor and site of occurrence did not influence the neurological deficit following enucleation of schwannoma.

Conclusion

These results support intra-capsular micro-enucleation as a safe and reliable treatment for every type of schwannoma. To minimize the risk of nerve injury, en bloc resection should not be used because the main purpose of schwannoma surgery is the relief of symptoms, not tumor resection. Thorough pre-operative counseling of patients to inform them of the potential occurrence of neurological deficit is important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adani R, Baccarani A, Guidi E, Tarallo L (2008) Schwannomas of the upper extremity: diagnosis and treatment. Chir Organi Mov 92(2):85–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Artico M, Cervoni L, Carloia S, Stevanato G, Mastantuono M, Nucci F (1997) Synovial cysts: clinical and neuroradiological aspects. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139(3):176–181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakkouri WE, Kania RE, Guichard JP, Lot G, Herman P, Huy PT (2009) Conservative management of 386 cases of unilateral vestibular schwannoma: tumor growth and consequences for treatment. J Neurosurg 110(4):662–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Das Gupta TK, Brasfield RD, Strong EW, Hajdu SI (1969) Benign solitary Schwannomas (neurilemomas). Cancer 24(2):355–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Donner TR, Voorhies RM, Kline DG (1994) Neural sheath tumors of major nerves. J Neurosurg 81(3):362–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang HJ, Shin SJ, Kang ES (2000) Schwannomas of the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Br 25(6):604–607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim DH, Murovic JA, Tiel RL, Moes G, Kline DG (2004) Operative outcomes of 546 Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center peripheral nerve tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 15(2):177–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim DH, Murovic JA, Tiel RL, Moes G, Kline DG (2005) A series of 146 peripheral non-neural sheath nerve tumors: 30-year experience at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center. J Neurosurg 102(2):256–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim P, Ebersold MJ, Onofrio BM, Quast LM (1989) Surgery of spinal nerve schwannoma. Risk of neurological deficit after resection of involved root. J Neurosurg 71(6):810–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Knight DM, Birch R, Pringle J (2007) Benign solitary schwannomas: a review of 234 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(3):382–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oberle J, Kahamba J, Richter HP (1997) Peripheral nerve schwannomas–an analysis of 16 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139(10):949–953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogose A, Hotta T, Morita T, Yamamura S, Hosaka N, Kobayashi H, Hirata Y (1999) Tumors of peripheral nerves: correlation of symptoms, clinical signs, imaging features, and histologic diagnosis. Skeletal Radiol 28(4):183–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozdemir O, Ozsoy MH, Kurt C, Coskunol E, Calli I (2005) Schwannomas of the hand and wrist: long-term results and review of the literature. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 13(3):267–272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Park MJ, Seo KN, Kang HJ (2009) Neurological deficit after surgical enucleation of schwannomas of the upper limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(11):1482–1486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Phalen GS (1976) Neurilemmomas of the forearm and hand. Clin Orthop Relat Res 114:219–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Russell SM (2007) Preserve the nerve: microsurgical resection of peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Neurosurgery 61(3):113–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sawada T, Sano M, Ogihara H, Omura T, Miura K, Nagano A (2006) The relationship between pre-operative symptoms, operative findings and postoperative complications in schwannomas. J Hand Surg Br 31(6):629–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Strickland JW, Steichen JB (1977) Nerve tumors of the hand and forearm. J Hand Surg Am 2(4):285–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Takase K, Yamamoto K, Imakiire A (2004) Clinical pathology and therapeutic results of neurilemmoma in the upper extremity. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 12(2):222–225

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Uchida K, Nakajima H, Sato R, Yayama T, Kobayashi S, Mwaka ES, Orwotho NT, Baba H (2009) Microsurgical intraneural extracapsular resection of neurinoma around the cervical neuroforamen: a technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 52(5–6):271–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weiss SW, Goldblum JR, Enzinger FM (2001) Benign tumors of the peripheral nerves. In: Weiss S, Goldblum JR (eds) Enzinger and Weiss’s soft tissue tumors, 4th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 1111–1208

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wippold FJ 2nd, Lubner M, Perrin RJ, Lämmle M, Perry A (2007) Neuropathology for the neuroradiologist: Antoni A and Antoni B tissue patterns. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28(9):1633–1638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Muramatsu.

Additional information

Comment

This manuscript provides discrete, statistically validated, evidence to support the use of intra-capsular enucleation on schwannomas.

William Lowry Maxwell

Glasgow, UK

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Date, R., Muramatsu, K., Ihara, K. et al. Advantages of intra-capsular micro-enucleation of schwannoma arising from extremities. Acta Neurochir 154, 173–178 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1213-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1213-0

Keywords

Navigation