Skip to main content
Log in

Reinforcement of pericranium as a dural substitute by fibrin sealant

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

For dural plasty, several kinds of substitute materials are used clinically. Among these materials, pericranium is often used as a dural substitute since it is autologous and easy to harvest. However, it is rather thin and fragile, which makes it difficult to suture onto peripheral dura mater, especially when the defect is large.

Objective

We present a simple method of reinforcing the pericranium with fibrin sealant, which facilitates easier handling and suturing of the pericranium.

Methods

Fifteen patients who underwent surgical removal of meningioma, metastatic brain tumor and glioma attached to the dura mater were included in this analysis. To close the defects, we use ‘fibrin-sealed pericranium’. Herein we describe the method we employed in these cases. First, a standard skin flap is made by dissecting the subgaleal layer, leaving the periosteum on the bone. Second, fibrin sealant is evenly applied to the pericranium. Finally, the pericranium is cut along the reinforced area and dissected from the bone. The harvested pericranium is then used for closure of the dural defect. Some of these patients received further treatment as needed according to each pathology. The fibrin-sealed pericranium was examined histopathologically.

Results

Fibrin-sealing of pericranium made it durable enough to be handled and sutured easily. There were no significant complications or treatment failures, such as infection or CSF leakage.

Conclusions

Reinforcement of the pericranium with fibrin sealant is a simple and easy method to reduce the stress of dural plasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Danish SF, Samdani A, Hanna A, Storm P, Sutton L (2006) Experience with acellular human dura and bovine collagen matrix for duraplasty after posterior fossa decompression for Chiari malformations. J Neurosurg 104(1 Suppl):16–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Knopp U, Christmann F, Reusche E, Sepehrnia A (2005) A new collagen biomatrix of equine origin versus a cadaveric dura graft for the repair of dural defects--a comparative animal experimental study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147(8):877–887

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Litvack ZN, West GA, Delashaw JB, Burchiel KJ, Anderson VC (2009) Dural augmentation: part I-evaluation of collagen matrix allografts for dural defect after craniotomy. Neurosurgery 65(5):890–897, discussion 897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Malliti M, Page P, Gury C, Chomette E, Nataf F, Roux FX (2004) Comparison of deep wound infection rates using a synthetic dural substitute (neuro-patch) or pericranium graft for dural closure: a clinical review of 1 year. Neurosurgery 54(3):599–603, discussion 603–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakagawa S, Hayashi T, Anegawa S, Nakashima S, Shimokawa S, Furukawa Y (2003) Postoperative infection after duraplasty with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sheet. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 43(3):120–124, discussion 124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Parizek J, Mericka P, Husek Z, Suba P, Spacek J, Nemecek S, Nemeckova J, Sercl M, Elias P (1997) Detailed evaluation of 2959 allogeneic and xenogeneic dense connective tissue grafts (fascia lata, pericardium, and dura mater) used in the course of 20 years for duraplasty in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139(9):827–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sade B, Oya S, Lee JH (2011) Non-watertight dural reconstruction in meningioma surgery: results in 439 consecutive patients and a review of the literature. J Neurosurg 114(3):714–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sawamura Y, Asaoka K, Terasaka S, Tada M, Uchida T (1999) Evaluation of application techniques of fibrin sealant to prevent cerebrospinal fluid leakage: a new device for the application of aerosolized fibrin glue. Neurosurgery 44(2):332–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vanaclocha V, Saiz-Sapena N (1997) Duraplasty with freeze-dried cadaveric dura versus occipital pericranium for Chiari type I malformation: comparative study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139(2):112–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Warren WL, Medary MB, Dureza CD, Bellotte JB, Flannagan PP, Oh MY, Fukushima T (2000) Dural repair using acellular human dermis: experience with 200 cases: technique assessment. Neurosurgery 46(6):1391–1396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Clinical Trial Registration number

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirotaka Ito.

Additional information

Comment

This is another useful contribution to the current debate on dural reconstruction. Autologous vs heterologous material? This concise report illustrates a reasonable compromise.

Domenico d'Avella

Padova, Italy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ito, H., Kimura, T., Sameshima, T. et al. Reinforcement of pericranium as a dural substitute by fibrin sealant. Acta Neurochir 153, 2251–2254 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1077-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1077-3

Keywords

Navigation