Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tentorial meningiomas: operative nuances and perioperative management dilemmas

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Tentorial meningiomas (TM), comprising approximately 3–6% of all intracranial meningiomas, are complex entities with an intricate relationship to surrounding structures and require multiple surgical approaches. In the present study, the rationale for deciding the approaches for TMs and the perioperative management dilemmas were evaluated.

Methods

Thirty-seven patients (28 primary [supratentorial (2), infratentorial (20) and both (6)] and nine complex [cerebellopontine (CP) angle (5) and petroclival (4)] TM) underwent surgery using the occipital transtentorial, supracerebellar infratentorial, subtemporal transtentorial, bioccipital suboccipital, midline suboccipital, retrosigmoid, and combined pre and retrosigmoid approaches. The extent of excision was categorized according to Simpson’s grade.

Results

Simpson’s grade of excision was I in six, II in 11, III in nine and IV in 11 patients, respectively. Follow-up assessment (2 months to 9 years) in 27 patients (72.9%) showed that 23 patients returned to their previous activity level with either no or minimal symptoms, three returned to previous activity level with major cranial nerve palsy, and one patient required permanent assistance. One patient had recurrence and four others underwent resurgery for residual tumor. Two patients with petroclival lesions died due to aspiration pneumonitis and meningitis, respectively; one with CP angle TM presented in a poor general condition and expired following emergency ventriculoperitoneal shunt and subsequent definite surgery. Pseudomeningocele, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and cranial nerve palsy were the major morbidities.

Conclusions

Classifying TM into medial and lateral, supra and infratentorial groups helps in deciding an appropriate and safe approach. Meticulously preserving venous sinuses is important since the risk of venous infarction cannot be predicted even with radiological good venous collaterization and apparent venous sinus blockade by tumor. Laterally situated tumors carry a better prognosis when compared to the medially situated ones. Leaving a small residual tumor in an effort to preserve important neurovascular structures does not obviate the expectation of a good long-term prognosis with minimal morbidity and low recurrence rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TM:

Tentorial meningioma

CP:

Cerebellopontine

VP:

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

CT:

Computed tomography

MR:

Magnetic resonance

References

  1. Bassiouni H, Hunold A, Asgari S, Stolke D (2004) Tentorial meningiomas: clinical results in 81 patients treated microsurgically. Neurosurgery 55:108–18. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000126886.48372.49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonna J (1982) Conservative and reconstructive surgery of the superior longitudinal sinus. Neurochirurgie 28:147–172

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bret P, Guyotat J, Madarassy G, Ricci AC, Signorelli F (2000) Tentorial meningiomas. Report on twenty-seven cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 142(5):513–526. doi:10.1007/s007010050464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bricolo AP, Turazzi S, Talacchi A, Cristofori L (1992) Microsurgical removal of petroclival meningiomas: A report of 33 patients. Neurosurgery 31:813–828. doi:10.1097/00006123-199211000-00001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carey JP, Fisher RG, Pelofsky S (1975) Tentorial meningiomas. Surg Neurol 3:41–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Castellano F, Ruggiero G (1953) Meningiomas of the posterior fossa. Acta Radiol Suppl 104:1–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ciric I, Landau B (1993) Tentorial and posterior cranial fossa meningiomas: operative results and long-term follow-up. Experience with 26 cases. Surg Neurol 39:530–537. doi:10.1016/0090-3019(93)90040-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cudlip SA, Wilkins PR, Johnstom FG, Moore AJ, Marsh HT, Bell BA (1998) Posterior fossa meningiomas: surgical experience in 52 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140:1007–1012. doi:10.1007/s007010050208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gökalp HZ, Arasil E, Erdogan A, Egemen N, Deda H, Cerçi A (1995) Tentorial meningiomas. Neurosurgery 36:46–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grand W, Bakay L (1975) Posterior fossa meningiomas. A report of 30 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 32:219–233. doi:10.1007/BF01405455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guidetti B, Ciappetta P, Domenicucci M (1988) Tentorial meningiomas: surgical experience with 61 cases and long-term results. J Neurosurg 69:183–187. doi:10.3171/jns.1988.69.2.0183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harrison MJ, Al-Mefty O (1997) Tentorial Meningiomas. Clinical Neurosurgery, Vol 44. Williams and Wilkin, Baltimore, pp 451–466

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kawase T, Shiobara R, Toya S (1991) Anterior transpetrosal transtentorial approach for sphenopetroclival meningiomas: surgical method and results in 10 patients. Neurosurgery 28:869–876. doi:10.1097/00006123-199106000-00014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nägele T, Petersen D, Klose U, Grodd W, Opitz H, Voigt K (1994) The “dural tail” adjacent to meningiomas studied by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a comparison with histopathology. Neuroradiology 36:303–307. doi:10.1007/BF00593266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakau H, Miyazawa T, Tamai S, Nakau H, Miyazawa T, Tamai S, Tsuchiya K, Shima K, Shirotani T, Chigasaki H et al (1997) Pathologic significance of meningeal enhancement (“flare sign”) of the meningiomas on MRI. Surg Neurol 48:584–590. doi:10.1016/S0090-3019(97)00016-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nicolato A, Ferraresi P, Foroni R, Pasqualin A, Piovan E, Severi F, Masotto B, Gerosa M (1996) Gamma knife radiosurgery in skull base meningiomas. Preliminary experience with 50 cases. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 66:112–120. doi:10.1159/0000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Odake G (1992) Meningioma of the falcotentorial region: report of two cases and literature review of occlusion of the Galenic system. Neurosurgery 30:788–794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Robert F, Sekhar LN, Kalavakonda C, Wright DC (1978) Posterior fossa meningiomas: surgical experience in 161 cases. Surg Neurol 56:8–21. doi:10.1016/S0090-3019(01)00479-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rostomily RC, Eskridge JM, Winn HR (1994) Tentorial meningioma. Neurosurg Clin N Am 5:331–348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Samii M, Carvalho G, Tatagiba M, Matthies C, Vorkapic P (1996) Meningiomas of the tentorial notch: surgical anatomy and management. J Neurosurg 84:375–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Samii M, Tatagiba M (1992) Experience with 36 surgical cases of petroclival meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 118:27–32. doi:10.1007/BF01400723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sen C (1996) Surgical approaches to tentorial meningiomas. In: Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS (eds) Neurosurgery Vol 1. New York, Mc Graw-Hill, pp 917–924

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sekhar LN, Jannetta PJ, Maroon JC (1984) Tentorial meningiomas: surgical management and results. Neurosurgery 14:268–275. doi:10.1097/00006123-198403000-00002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Simpson D (1957) The recurrence of intracranial meningioma after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20:22–39. doi:10.1136/jnnp.20.1.22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. William PL, Warwick R (1980) The meninges, 36th edn. In: Williams PL, Warwick R (eds) Gray’s anatomy. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, pp 1045–1047

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yasargil MG (1996) Meningiomas. In: Yasargil MG (ed) Microneurosurgery of CNS tumors. Stuttgart, Georg Thieme Verlag, pp 134–165

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Behari.

Additional information

Comment

This is quite a good review of the surgical strategies to approach difficult intracranial tumors, such as TMs. The authors have presented their data and results in a convincing and clear way. Also agreeable is to divide such pathological entities in two subgroups, i.e. primary and complex TMs.

The authors should be thanked for the credit given to Castellano and Ruggiero, since these two neurosurgeons and scientists were among the first to describe the TMs with their specific anatomical features concerning the tumor attachment site.

Paolo Cappabianca

Napoli, Italy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shukla, D., Behari, S., Jaiswal, A.K. et al. Tentorial meningiomas: operative nuances and perioperative management dilemmas. Acta Neurochir 151, 1037–1051 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0421-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0421-3

Keywords

Navigation