Summary
Eight cases of neurosurgical operations being performed on the wrong side were studied. Safeguards of confidentiality were used. In seven cases side marking was not done and the surgeons felt that had it been done, the mistake would have or may have been prevented. In all but one case the surgeon’s normal side check was omitted. Distracting circumstances contributed to the checks being omitted in these seven cases. In the one case where the check was carried out the mistake was made because the patient had been marked on the wrong side. In no case was the mistake made because of ambiguous or absent site data in the imaging or notes. It is concluded that to prevent these mistakes emphasis should be placed on ensuring that the preoperative site check is completed more than on ensuring that unambiguous side information is available in the notes and imaging.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P Carayon K Schultz AS Hundt (2004) ArticleTitleRighting wrong site surgery Jt Comm J Qual Saf 30 IssueID7 405–510 Occurrence Handle15279505
Dankelman J, Grimbergen CA (2005) Systems approach to reduce errors in surgery. Surg Endosc
Hawkins FH (1993) Human factors in Flight. In: Orlady HW (ed), Aldershot, Ashgate
EG Meinberg PJ Stern (2003) ArticleTitleIncidence of wrong-site surgery among hand surgeons J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A IssueID2 193–197 Occurrence Handle12571293
NPSA (2005) Patient safety alert: correct site surgery, in Secondary Patient safety alert: correct site surgery, secondary NPSA. National Patient Safety Agency (UK). http://www.npsa.nhs.uk/site/media/documents/883_CSS%20PSA06%20FINAL.pdf#search='correct%20site%20surgery'
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitchell, P., Nicholson, C. & Jenkins, A. Side errors in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148, 1289–1292 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-006-1041-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-006-1041-9