Summary
Background. A prospective study was performed comparing the accuracy of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) stenosis findings with measurements on histological specimens.
Method. DSA and DUS were used to evaluate carotid stenosis and were compared with measurements on histological specimens. Intact carotid plaques from 123 cases were removed in one piece during surgery. The specimens were histologically processed and examined in transverse sections. The smallest inner and correlating outer diameters were measured and the extent of stenosis was calculated. Carotid artery stenoses were compared and statistics done. Specimens in symptomatic cases were divided into 3 groups: stenosis 30–49% (Group 1), stenosis 50–69% (Group 2) and stenosis 70–99% (Group 3). Specimens in asymptomatic cases were divided into two groups: stenosis ≤59% (Group A) and stenosis ≥60% (Group B).
Findings. Wilcoxon paired tests revealed significant differences between DSA, DUS and measurements on histological specimens. In severe stenoses only, no significant difference was observed between stenosis measurement according to the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) angiography methodology and measurements on histological specimens. The most pronounced differences were found between angiography methodology of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and measurements on histological specimens. When investigating how often preoperative measurement classified stenosis into the same Group of stenoses as postoperative measurement, DUS was the most accurate diagnostic tool.
Conclusions. This study confirmed our previous results, i.e., angiography underestimates the degree of carotid artery stenosis. DUS seems to be more accurate in classifying stenoses into different groups to the extent of narrowing of the carotid arteries. These results make the position of angiography in diagnostic algorithm of carotid stenoses investigations even more questionable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
GW Albers RG Hart HL Lutsep DW Newell RL Sacco (1999) ArticleTitleSupplement to the guidelines for the management of transient ischemic attacks. A statement from the ad hoc committee on guidelines for the management of transient ischemic attacks, stroke council, American Heart Association Stroke 30 2502–2511 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FhvVekug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10548693
AV Alexandrov CF Bladin R Maggisano JW Norris (1993) ArticleTitleMeasuring carotid stenosis. Time for a reappraisal Stroke 24 1292–1296 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA28bosVA%3D Occurrence Handle8362420
AV Alexandrow DS Brodie A McLean P Hamilton J Murphy PN Burns (1997) ArticleTitleCorrelation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited Stroke 28 339–342
AV Alexandrov (2003) ArticleTitleUltrasound and angiography in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy Curr Cardiol Rep 5 IssueID2 141–147 Occurrence Handle12583859
InstitutionalAuthorNameAsymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group (2004) ArticleTitlePrevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial Lancet 363 1491–1502
MR Back GA Rogers JS Wilson BL Johnson ML Shames DF Bandyk (2003) ArticleTitleMagnetic resonance angiography minimizes need for arteriography after inadequate carotid duplex ultrasound scanning J Vasc Surg 38 IssueID3 422–430 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0741-5214(03)00794-8 Occurrence Handle12947246
HJ Barnett DW Taylor M Eliasziw AJ Fox GG Ferguson RB Haynes RN Rankin GP Clagett VC Hachinski DL Sackett KE Thorpe HE Meldrum InstitutionalAuthorNamefor the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (1998) ArticleTitleBenefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis N Engl J Med 339 1415–1425 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FhsFeqsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9811916
DC Barratt BB Ariff KN Humphries SA Thom AD Hughes (2004) ArticleTitleReconstruction and quantification of the carotid artery bifurcation from 3-D ultrasound images IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23 IssueID5 567–583 Occurrence Handle10.1109/TMI.2004.825601 Occurrence Handle15147010
V Beneš D Netuka V Mandys M Vrabec M Mohapl V Beneš SuffixJr F Kramář (2004) ArticleTitleComparison between degree of carotid stenosis observed at angiography and in histological examination Acta Neurochir (Wien) 146 IssueID7 671–677
J Biller WM Feinberg JE Castaldo AD Whittemore RE Harbaugh RJ Dempsey LR Caplan TF Kresowik DB Matchar JF Toole JD Easton HP Adams SuffixJr LM Brass RW Hobson SuffixII TG Brott L Sternau (1998) ArticleTitleGuidelines for carotid endarterectomy. AHA Scientific Statement Circulation 97 501–509 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ktVKqsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9490248
I Borisch M Horn B Butz N Zorger B Draganski T Hoelscher U Bogdahn J Link (2003) ArticleTitlePreoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography AJNR 24 IssueID6 1117–1122 Occurrence Handle12812936
E Buskens PJ Nederkoorn TB Der Woude WP Mali LJ Kappelle BC Eikelboom Y Van Der Graaf MG Myriam Hunink (2004) ArticleTitleImaging of carotid arteries in symptomatic patients: cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies Radiology 233 IssueID1 101–112 Occurrence Handle15333770
OE Elgersma AF Wust PC Buijs Y van Der Graaf BC Eikelboom WP Mali (2000) ArticleTitleMultidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography Radiology 216 IssueID2 511–516 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvgslWjug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10924579
InstitutionalAuthorNameEuropean Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1991) ArticleTitleMRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis Lancet 337 1235–1243
InstitutionalAuthorNameEuropean Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1998) ArticleTitleRandomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) Lancet 351 1379–1387
InstitutionalAuthorNameExecutive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (1995) ArticleTitleEndarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis JAMA 273 1421–1428
DC Johnston LB Goldstein (2001) ArticleTitleClinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography Neurology 56 1009–1015 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3jtFCkuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11320170
Y Kono SP Pinnell CB Sirlin SR Sparks B Georgy W Wong RF Mattrey (2004) ArticleTitleCarotid arteries: contrast-enhanced US angiography-preliminary clinical experience Radiology 230 IssueID2 561–568 Occurrence Handle14699188
PJ Nederkoorn OE Elgersma WP Mali BC Eikelboom LJ Kappelle Y van der Graaf (2002) ArticleTitleOverestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography J Vasc Surg 36 IssueID4 806–813 Occurrence Handle12368742
PJ Nederkoorn WP Mali BC Eikelboom OE Elgersma E Buskens MG Hunink LJ Kappelle PC Buijs AF Wust A van der Lugt Y van der Graaf (2002) ArticleTitlePreoperative Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive testing Stroke 33 2003–2008 Occurrence Handle10.1161/01.STR.0000021900.58396.44 Occurrence Handle12154253
InstitutionalAuthorNameNorth American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (1991) ArticleTitleBeneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis N Engl J Med 325 445–453
XM Pan D Saloner LM Reilly JC Bowersox SP Murray CM Anderson GA Gooding JH Rapp (1995) ArticleTitleAssessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis J Vasc Surg 21 82–88 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70246-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC38zmvFc%3D Occurrence Handle7823365
PM Rothwell (2003) ArticleTitleFor severe carotid stenosis found on ultrasound, further arterial evaluation prior to carotid endarterectomy is unnecessary: the argument against Stroke 34 IssueID7 1817–1819 Occurrence Handle10.1161/01.STR.0000079176.04043.09 Occurrence Handle12829870
EA Schenk MG Bond TH Aretz JN Angelo HY Choi T Rynalski NF Gustafson AS Berson JJ Ricotta MW Goodison (1988) ArticleTitleMulticenter validation study of real-time ultrasonography, arteriography, and pathology: pathologic evaluation of carotid endarterectomy specimens Stroke 19 289–296 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieC2sfosFA%3D Occurrence Handle3281330
M Sitzer G Furst H Fischer M Siebler T Fehlings A Kleinschmidt T Kahn H Steinmetz (1993) ArticleTitleBetween-Method Correlation in Quantifying Internal Carotid Stenosis Stroke 24 1513–1518 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyA1M3hslM%3D Occurrence Handle8378955
N Suwanela U Can KL Furie JF Southern NR Macdonald CS Ogilvy CJ Hansen FS Buonanno WM Abbott WJ Koroshetz JP Kistler (1996) ArticleTitleCarotid Doppler ultrasound criteria for internal carotid artery stenosis based on residual lumen diameter calculated from en bloc carotid endarterectomy specimens Stroke 27 1965–1969
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Netuka, D., Beneš, V., Mandys, V. et al. Accuracy of angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the detection of carotid stenosis: a histopathological study of 123 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148, 511–520 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-006-0756-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-006-0756-y