Skip to main content
Log in

Hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation: a ten year experience

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Objective. To analyse the occurrence of hardware-related complications in patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS), over a long period of time.

Method. All patients operated on with DBS at our institution between 1993 and 2002 were followed with respect to adverse events related to the implanted hardware.

Results. One hundred and nineteen consecutive patients underwent 139 procedures with implantation of 161 electrodes. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. The follow-up time was 540 electrode-years. The rate of hardware-related complications per electrode-year was 4.3%. In total, 17 patients (15%) had 23 hardware-related complications. These included 8 electrode breakages, 4 electrode migrations, 2 stimulator migrations, 3 erosions, 2 erosions and infections, 2 infections and 2 cases of stimulator malfunction. The majority of these complications occurred during the first four years in our experience.

Conclusions. DBS is a life-long therapy that requires a life-long follow-up. Increased experience and adaptation of surgical technique are the main determinants for avoidance of hardware-related complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AL Benabid P Pollak A Louveau S Henry J de Rougemont (1987) ArticleTitleCombined (thalamotomy and stimulation) stereotactic surgery of the VIM thalamic nucleus for bilateral Parkinson disease. Appl Neurophysiol 50 344–346 Occurrence Handle3329873

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • A Beric PJ Kelly A Rezai D Sterio A Mogilner M Zonenshayn B Kopell (2001) ArticleTitleComplications of deep brain stimulation surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 77 73–78 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000064600 Occurrence Handle12378060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • W Hamel B Schrader D Weinert J Herzog D Muller G Deuschl J Volkmann HM Mehdorn (2002) ArticleTitleTechnical complication in deep brain stimulation. Zentralbl Neurochir 63 124–127 Occurrence Handle10.1055/s-2002-35822 Occurrence Handle12457339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hariz M, Laitinen L (1996) The Laitinen apparatus. In: Gildenberg PL, Tasker R (eds) Textbook of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. McGraw-Hill, pp 87–94

  • MI Hariz F Johansson (2001) ArticleTitleHardware failure in parkinsonian patients with chronic subthalamic nucleus stimulation is a medical emergency. Mov Disord 16 166–168 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1531-8257(200101)16:1<166::AID-MDS1031>3.0.CO;2-S Occurrence Handle11215582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • H Hirabayashi M Hariz M Fagerlund (1998) ArticleTitleComparison between stereotactic CT and MRI cordinates of pallidal and thalamic targets using the Laitinen noninvasive stereoadapter. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 71 117–130 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000029655 Occurrence Handle10420145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • C Joint D Nandi S Parkin R Gregory T Aziz (2002) ArticleTitleHardware-related problems of deep brain stimulation. Mov Disord 17 IssueIDSuppl 3 S175–S180 Occurrence Handle10.1002/mds.10161 Occurrence Handle11948774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D Kondziolka D Whiting A Germanwala M Oh (2002) ArticleTitleHardware-related complications after placement of thalamic deep brain stimulator systems. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 79 228–233 Occurrence Handle10.1159/000070836 Occurrence Handle12890981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Leksell D (1996) The Leksell stereotactic system. In: Gildenberg PL, Tasker R (eds) Textbook of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. McGraw-Hill, pp 51–63

  • K Lyons W Koller S Wilkinson PR Pahwa (2001) ArticleTitleSurgical and device-related events with deep brain stimulation. Neurology 56 A147

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh MY, Abosch A, Kim SH, Lang AE, Lozano AM (2002) Long-term hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery 50: 1268–1274; discussion 1274–1266

    Google Scholar 

  • PR Schuurman DA Bosch PM Bossuyt GJ Bonsel EJ van Someren RM de Bie MP Merkus JD Speelman (2000) ArticleTitleA comparison of continuous thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy for suppression of severe tremor. N Engl J Med 342 461–468 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM200002173420703 Occurrence Handle10675426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JM Schwalb HA Riina B Skolnick JL Jaggi T Simuni GH Baltuch (2001) ArticleTitleRevision of deep brain stimulator for tremor. Technical note. J Neurosurg 94 1010–1012 Occurrence Handle11409503

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tasker RR (1998) Deep brain stimulation is preferable to thalamotomy for tremor suppression. Surg Neurol 49: 145–153; discussion 153–144

    Google Scholar 

  • RR Tasker M Munz FS Junn ZH Kiss K Davis JO Dostrovsky AM Lozano (1997) ArticleTitleDeep brain stimulation and thalamotomy for tremor compared. Acta Neurochir [Suppl] (Wien) 68 49–53

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blomstedt, P., Hariz, M. Hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation: a ten year experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147, 1061–1064 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-005-0576-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-005-0576-5

Navigation