Abstract
The taxonomic position of Panax bipinnatifidus is controversial and problematic. To infer inter- or intra-specific morphological relationship in Panax bipinnatifidus and its allies—P. sikkimensis and P. sokpayensis, we carried out a phenetic study of these taxa, based on thirteen morphological characters (eight quantitative and five qualitative), using univariate and multivariate analysis. The results obtained from the principle component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA) revealed lack of taxonomic differences between Panax bipinnatifidus and P. sikkimensis, whereas P. sokpayensis showed distinct morphological features. Discriminant analysis (DA) of the quantitative morphological characters also did not reveal any dissimilarity between Panax bipinnatifidus and P. sikkimensis. There were no differences between majority of the morphological characters of Panax bipinnatifidus and P. sikkimensis except for the presence of pinnate leaflets and absence of bracts in the latter. The lack of differences in morphological characters of Panax bipinnatifidus and P. sikkimensis suggest that these two taxa are part of the same species complex. Our field studies show that Panax binnatifidus does not occur as an independent species anywhere in nature, but always shows a congeneric association with P. sikkimensis. In addition, the morphotype of undivided leaflets (P. sikkimensis) is more normal and common than the morphotype of pinnate or bipinnate leaflets (P. bipinnatifidus) in natural populations. Following the principle of priority of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature we conclude that Panax bipinnatifidus is a distinct species, while P. sikkimensis is a synonym of P. bipinnatifidus in Indian Himalaya. Based on the present investigations we propose that Panax bipinnatifidus Seem. should be given recognition and priority for the specific rank as opposed to the views of earlier workers. A taxonomic key of the studied taxa is provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banerjee RN (1968) A taxonomic revision of Indian Panax L. (Araliaceae). Bull Bot Surv Ind 40:20–27
Bennet SSR, Sharma BK (1983) Indian Ginseng. Ind For 109:840–845
Bennet SSR, Viswanathan MV (1984) The common Indian ginseng. Ind For 110:1049–1052
Burkill IH (1902) Ginseng in China. Kew Bull 4:4–11
Canon JFM (1979) Panax pseudoginseng Wall. In: Hara H, William LJH (eds) An enumeration of the flowering plants of Nepal, vol 2. British Museum, London, p 192
Choi HK, Wen J (2000) A phylogenetic analysis of Panax (Araliaceae): integrating evidence of chloroplast DNA and the ITS sequences of DNA. Pl Syst Evol 224:109–120
Clarke CB (1879) Aralia L. In: Hooker JD (ed) Flora of British India, vol 2. Reeve and Co., London, pp 721–722
Dayrat B (2005) Towards integrative taxonomy. Biol J Linn Soc 85:407–415
Dunn CP (2003) Keeping taxonomy based in morphology. Trends Ecol Evol 18:270–271
Graham SA (1966) The genera of Araliaceae in southern United States. J Arnold Arbor 47:126–136
Hara H (1970) On the Asiatic species of the genus Panax. J Jap Bot 45:197–212
Hu SY (1976) The genus Panax (ginseng) in Chinese medicine. Eco Bot 30:11–28
Hu SY, Rüdenberg L, Tredici PD (1980) Studies of American Ginsengs. Rhodora 82:627–636
Lee C, Wen J (2004) Phylogeny of Panax using chloroplast trnC-trnD intergenic region and the utility of trnC-trnD in interspecific studies of plants. Mol Phylogenet Evol 31:894–903
Nayar MP, Sastry ARK (1990) Red Data Book of Indian Plants, vol. 3. Botanical Survey of India, Kolkatta
Pandit MK, Babu CR (1998) Biology and conservation of Coptis teeta Wall: an endemic and endangered medicinal herb of Eastern Himalaya. Environ Conserv 25:262–272
Pandit MK, Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Bhaskar A, Brook BW (2007) Unreported yet massive deforestation driving loss of endemic biodiversity in Indian Himalaya. Biodiv Conserv 16:153–163
Proctor JTA, Bailey WG (1987) Ginseng: industry, botany, and culture. Hort Rev 9:187–236
Seemann B (1868) On the genus Panax. Jr Bot (Moral) 6:52–58
Sharma SK, Pandit MK (2009) A new species of Panax L. (Araliaceae) from Sikkim Himalaya, India. Syst Bot 34:434–438
Sneath PHA (1976) Phenetic taxonomy at the species level and above. Taxon 25:437–450
Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman, San Francisco
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1997) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman, New York
TIBCO Spotfire S+ (2008) TIBCO Spotfire S+, version 8.1.1, TIBCO Software Inc, USA
Wallich N (1829) An account of the Nipal ginseng. Trans Med Phys Soc Cal 4:115–120
Watanabe T, Kawaguchi K, Suzuki H, Yoshikawa T, Tanaka A, Isoda S, Kohda H, Malla KJ (1998) Studies on the medicinal plant resources of the Himalayas (3), random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis and saponin contents of Himalayan Ginseng (Panax pseudoginseng Wall.). Nat Med 52:426–433
Wen J (2001) Species diversity, nomenclature, phylogeny, biogeography, and classification of the ginseng genus (Panax L., Araliaceae). In: Punja ZK (ed) Proceedings of the International Ginseng Workshop: utilization of biotechnological, genetic and cultural approaches for North American and Asian ginseng. Simon Fraser University Press, Canada, pp 67–88
Wen J, Nowicke JW (1999) Pollen ultrastructure of Panax (the ginseng genus, Araliaceae), an eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct genus. Am Jr Bot 86:1624–1636
Wen J, Zimmer EA (1996) Phylogeny and biogeography of Panax L. (the ginseng genus, Araliaceae): inferences from ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal RNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 6:167–177
Wheeler QD, Raven PH, Wilson EO (2004) Taxonomy: impediment or expedient? Science 303:285
Yang DQ (1981) The cyto-taxonomic studies on some species of Panax L. Acta Phytotax Sin 19:298–303
Yoo K-O, Malla KJ, Wen J (2001) Chloroplast DNA variation of Panax (Araliaceae) in Nepal and its taxonomic implications. Brittonia 53:447–453
Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical Analysis. New Jersey, Prentice Hall Inc
Acknowledgments
The financial support of the Ministry of Environment, Forests & Wildlife, Government of India & NHPC India for the research project sanctioned to Maharaj K. Pandit vide Project No. J.12011/11/99-IA.I. is acknowledged. We thank Joint Directors, Botanical Survey of India, Sikkim Himalayan Circle, Gangtok (SHC) and Central National Herbarium, Kolkatta (CAL), who allowed us access to the herbarium specimens. We also thank Department of Forests, Govt. of Sikkim for necessary permissions and assistance in the field.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
List of specimens studied:
Panax pseudoginseng Wall.—NEPAL: Sheopore (Shivapuri), Kathmandu, 1829, N. Wallich 3730 (lectotype: CAL); Sheopore (Shivapuri), Kathmandu, 1829, N. Wallich 3730 (isolectotype: CAL).
Panax sikkimensis Ban.—INDIA: Lachung valley, Sikkim, Aug 1892, G. A. Gammie s.n. (DD); Kyangnosla, Sikkim, 4 Aug 1945, N. L. Bors 288 (DD); Zemu valley, Sikkim, 25 Jul 1909 Smith & Cave (CAL); Chungthang to Lachen, Sikkim, 16 May 1945, K. Biswas (CAL); Kyongnosla, Sikkim, 23 Jun 2000, S. S. Dash (SHC); Lachen, Tallam, Sikkim, 15 Jul 1986, D. C. S. Raju & S. Singh (SHC); Lachung, Yakchey to Yumthang, Sikkim, 10 Jul 1986, D. C. S. Raju & S. Singh (SHC); Lachen, Gompa to Bhotey busty, Sikkim, 24 Jul 1986, D. C. S. Raju & S. Singh (SHC); Thangu, Kalep, Sikkim, 12 Sept 1988, R. C. Srivastava (SHC); On way to Yumthang, Sikkim, 27 Jul 1989, R. C. Srivastava (SHC); Lachung to Dombeyang, Sikkim, 27 Jul 1997, S. S. Dash & A. Maiti (SHC); Lachen to Thangu, Sikkim, 26 Aug 1982, P. Chakraborty (SHC); Tonglo, Darjeeling, 8 Jun 1884, C. B. Clarke (CAL); Tonglo, Darjeeling, 15 Jun 1961, T. A. Rao (CAL); Ramam, Darjeeling, 1942, H. G. Champion (DD); Tonglo, Darjeeling, Aug 1874, J. S. Gamble 3040B (DD); Tonglo, Darjeeling, 4 Sept 1876, G. King (CAL); Sandakphu to Rimbick, Darjeeling, 9 Oct 1944, K. Biswas 5661 (CAL); Tawang, Lumla, Arunachal Pradesh, 30 Jul 1987, J. Lal, 1641 (ARUN); Tawang, West Kameng, Arunachal Pradesh, 1 Sept 1984, H. B. Naithani 1154 (DD).
Panax sikkimensis Ban.—BHUTAN: Gautsa to Latung, 17 Aug 1938, B. J. Gould 1529 (DD); Ha to Domtang, 24 Jul 1938, B. J. Gould 1285 (DD).
Panax assamicus Ban.—INDIA: Rahu-Wakka, NEFA (Arunachal Pradesh), 2 Jul 1961, R. N. Banerjee (CAL); Rupa – Bomdila, NEFA (Arunachal Pradesh), 11 May 1957 R. S. Rao (CAL); Sirohee (Siroi), Manipur, 10 Jul 1948, S. K. Mukherji 3183 (CAL); Shiwang Khasia, Meghalaya, Aug 1890, H. Collett 16 (CAL); Khasia, East–West Dumpep, Meghalaya, 3 Jun 1911, I. H. Burkill & S. C. Banerjee (CAL); Bioch hill, Meghalaya, 5 Jul 1956, D. Chatterji 48 (CAL); Shillong peak, Meghalaya, 5 Jun 1958, R. S. Rao (CAL); Shillong peak, Meghalaya, 23 Jul 1913, U. Kanjilal 2344 (DD); Khasia Hills, Meghalaya, Jun 1876, G. Mann 385 (DD); Maphlang, Lower Lyngdoh, Meghalaya, 21 Aug 1974, P. K. Hajra (ASSAM); Wahlyer Nongsto, Showang corner, Meghalaya, 14 Jun 1958, G. Panigrahi (CAL).
Panax bipinnatifidus Seem.—INDIA: Laghep, Sikkim,11 Jul 1910, W. W. Smith (CAL); Sikkim, 1849, Hooker & Thomson (CAL); Dzongri, Bakhim, Sikkim, 5 Jun 1996, A. Maity & S. K. Rai (SHC); Dzongri to Tsoka, Sikkim, 22 Jun 1993, S. Pradhan (SHC); Mt. Tankra, Sikkim, 1 Aug 1892, G. A. Gammie (CAL); North-East of Tolung, Lingur, Darjeeling, 25 Jul 1884, C. B. Clarke 277 (CAL); Tonglo, Darjeeling, 4 Jun 1884, C. B. Clarke (CAL); Mt. Singalelah, Darjeeling, 13 Jun 1892, G. A. Gammie (CAL).
Panax sokpayensis Sharma and Pandit—INDIA: Uttarey, Sikkim, 25 Aug 2005, S. K. Sharma120 (CUD); Neebi to Buckeem, 06 Oct 1862, T. Anderson, 191750 (CAL).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, S.K., Pandit, M.K. A morphometric analysis and taxonomic study of Panax bipinnatifidus Seem. (Araliaceae) species complex from Sikkim Himalaya, India. Plant Syst Evol 297, 87 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-011-0501-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-011-0501-8