Skip to main content
Log in

Thermal gradient for fluorometric optimization of droplet PCR in virtual reaction chambers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Microchimica Acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An open system with a thermal gradient is described for the optimization of polymerase chain reactions (PCR). Two thermal electric coolers were used as the heat source. The gradient is measured through encapsulated water-based beads of a temperature-dependent dye inside mineral oil, thereby forming virtual reaction chambers. Nine droplets (with typical volume of 0.7 μL) were used. Using the intrinsic fluorescence of a temperature-sensitive inert dye (sulforhodamine B), the process involves measurement of the fluorescence intensity at a known, uniform temperature together with the instrument-specific calibration constant to calculate an unknown, possibly non-uniform temperature. The results show that a nearly linear thermal gradient is obtained. This gradient function is a useful feature that can be used for optimization of a commonly used enzyme-activated reaction, viz. PCR. The emission spectra of fluorescent droplets during two-step PCR were monitored and the changes in fluorescence between 50 °C and 100 °C quantified. As the gradient feature allows for testing a range of annealing temperatures simultaneously, the optimal annealing temperature can be easily determined in a single experiment.

Schematic presentation of an open system with a thermal gradient designed for PCR optimization. The exact temperature-time course of the sample is monitored in real-time throughout the thermal cycling. The method ensures significant time-savings and a reduction in reagent use during optimization and standard PCR experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kopp MU, De Mello AJ, Manz A (1998) Chemical amplification: continuous-flow PCR on a chip. Science 280:1046–1048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ross D, Gaitan M, Locascio LE (2001) Temperature measurement in microfluidic systems using a temperature-dependent fluorescent dye. Anal Chem 73:4117–4123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu J, Kodzius R, Cao W, Wen W (2014) Extraction, amplification and detection of DNA in microfluidic chip-based assays. Microchim Acta 181:1611–1631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Karle M, Vashist SK, Zengerle R, von Stetten F (2016) Microfluidic solutions enabling continuous processing and monitoring of biological samples: a review. Anal Chim Acta 929:1–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Neuzil P, Pipper J, Hsieh TM (2006) Disposable real-time microPCR device: lab-on-a-chip at a low cost. Mol BioSyst 2:292–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Neužil P, Sun W, Karásek T, Manz A (2015) Nanoliter-sized overheated reactor. Appl Phys Lett 106:024104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahrberg CD, Ilic BR, Manz A, Neužil P (2016) Handheld real-time PCR device. Lab Chip 16:586–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang X-d, Wolfbeis OS, Meier RJ (2013) Luminescent probes and sensors for temperature. Chem Soc Rev 42:7834–7869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vukusic P, Hooper I (2005) Directionally controlled fluorescence emission in butterflies. Science 310:1151–1151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hatch AC, Fisher JS, Tovar AR, Hsieh AT, Lin R, Pentoney SL, Yang DL, Lee AP (2011) 1-million droplet array with wide-field fluorescence imaging for digital PCR. Lab Chip 11:3838–3845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahrberg CD, Manz A, Chung BG (2016) Polymerase chain reaction in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 16:3866–3884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mullis K, Faloona F, Scharf S, Saiki R, Horn G, Erlich H (1986) Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in vitro: the polymerase chain reaction. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 51:263–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kean OW (2010) Using the gradient technology of the Mastercycler pro to generate a single universal PCR protocol for multiple primer sets. Appl Note 220

  14. Lopez J, Prezioso V (2001) A better way to optimize: two-step gradient PCR. Eppendorf BioNews Appl Note 16:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim H, Park N, Hahn JH (2016) Parallel-processing continuous-flow device for optimization-free polymerase chain reaction. Anal Bioanal Chem 408:6751–6758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lagally E, Medintz I, Mathies R (2001) Single-molecule DNA amplification and analysis in an integrated microfluidic device. Anal Chem 73:565–570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Terabe S, Otsuka K, Ando T (1985) Electrokinetic chromatography with micellar solution and open-tubular capillary. Anal Chem 57:834–841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. LightCycler 2.0 Instrument (2017) Product specifications. https://lifescience.roche.com/shop/en/global/products/lightcycler14301-20-instrument. Accessed 20 Feb 2017

  19. Sanford LN, Wittwer CT (2014) Fluorescence-based temperature control for polymerase chain reaction. Anal Biochem 448:75–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanford LN, Wittwer CT (2013) Monitoring temperature with fluorescence during real-time PCR and melting analysis. Anal Biochem 434:26–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Natrajan V, Christensen K (2008) Two-color laser-induced fluorescent thermometry for microfluidic systems. Meas Sci Technol 20:015401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ³Prime thermal cycler, PCR optimisation: using a gradient. http://www.techne.com/product.asp?dsl=910, Appl Note A01-001B Accessed 23 Feb 2017

  23. Bio-Rad (2006) Real-Time PCR applications guide.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Christian Ahrberg (former KIST Europe employee) for help with data processing. We would like to thank Yuliya E. Silina (INM institute, Saarland University) for testing the stability of the coating method. We would like to thank Zhenjun Chang (Jiangsu University of Science and Technology) for the advice of revising the manuscript. This research was funded by the China Scholarship Council (File No. 201308330205).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenming Wu or Andreas Manz.

Ethics declarations

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 22.6 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Wu, W. & Manz, A. Thermal gradient for fluorometric optimization of droplet PCR in virtual reaction chambers. Microchim Acta 184, 3433–3439 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2353-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2353-6

Keywords

Navigation