Abstract
Dynamic fragmentation is one of the primary fracture types for rock mass in rock engineering. The dynamic fragmentation process and dynamic fragment size characteristics are important for the fragmentation optimization in field. Most researchers studied the fragmentation forming process via dynamic compression test using the traditional split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) system, in which the multiple dynamic loading is generally applied on the rock specimen. However, the effect of the multiple loading on the dynamic rock fragmentation characteristics was rarely attempted. In this study, the momentum-trap system is used in SHPB to achieve the single dynamic compressive loading on the rock specimen. Westerly granite and Fangshan marble were chosen to investigate the effect of multiple dynamic compressive loading pulses on the fragmentation characteristics. During the dynamic loading, the fragmentation process was captured using the high-speed camera. The results show that under the specific loading rate, the multiple loading has no influence on measuring the dynamic compressive strength of rocks, but it was observed in the high-speed images that more fragments were produced in the multiple loading. Moreover, the failure mode of tested specimens under distinct compressive loading rates was examined. The results indicate that the fragmentized degree of rocks with single dynamic loading is less than that with multiple dynamic loading at a given loading rate. This trend is relatively obvious when the loading rate is lower. In addition, the D50 values of rocks with multiple dynamic loading are smaller than those with single dynamic loading. The fragment size distribution also indicates that the multiple loading pulses dominantly influence the produce and size distribution of the fine-grain fragment. Furthermore, the mean fragment size derived from Weibull distribution decreases as the loading rate increases. The multiple loading pulses could decrease the mean fragment size and generate more fine grains when comparing to the fragment size of rocks derived from the single loading pulse. Therefore, the multiple compressive loading may result in an inaccurate fragmentation size analysis, and the single dynamic compressive loading should be applied when evaluating the dynamic fragmentation efficiency of rocks.
References
Aben FM, Doan ML, Gratier JP, Renard F (2017) High strain rate deformation of porous sandstone and the asymmetry of earthquake damage in shallow fault zones. Earth Planet Sci Lett 463:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.01.016
Bhat HS, Sammis CG, Rosakis AJ (2011) The micromechanics of westerley granite at large compressive loads. Pure Appl Geophys 168:2181–2198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-011-0271-9
Blake O, Faulkner D (2016) The effect of fracture density and stress state on the static and dynamic bulk moduli of Westerly granite. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121:2382–2399
Chau K, Wong R (1996) Uniaxial compressive strength and point load strength of rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 33:183–188
Chen WW, Song B (2010) Split hopkinson (Kolsky) bar: Design, testing and applications. Springer, New York
Chen G, Spetzler H (1993) Complexities of rock fracture and rock friction from deformation of Westerly granite. Pure Appl Geophys 140:95–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00876873
Grady DE (2008) Fragment size distributions from the dynamic fragmentation of brittle solids. Int J Impact Eng 35:1557–1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.07.042
Grady DE, Kipp ME (1985) Geometric statistics and dynamic fragmentation. J Appl Phys 58:1210–1222. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.336139
Haimson B, Chang C (2000) A new true triaxial cell for testing mechanical properties of rock, and its use to determine rock strength and deformability of Westerly granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(99)00106-9
Hogan JD, Spray JG, Rogers RJ, Boonsue S, Vincent G, Schneider M (2011) Micro-scale energy dissipation mechanisms during dynamic fracture in natural polyphase ceramic blocks. Int J Impact Eng 38:931–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.06.004
Hong L, Zhou Z-l, Yin T-b, Liao G-y, Ye Z-y (2009) Energy consumption in rock fragmentation at intermediate strain rate. J Cent South Univ Technol 16:677–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-009-0112-5
Hou T-x, Xu Q, Zhou J-w (2015) Size distribution, morphology and fractal characteristics of brittle rock fragmentations by the impact loading effect. Acta Mech 226:3623–3637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-015-1409-0
Knopoff L (1954) Seismic wave velocities in westerly granite. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 35:969–973. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR035i006p00969
Kolsky H (1953) Stress waves in solids. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Krech WW, Henderson FA, Hjelmstad KE (1974) A standard rock suite for rapid excavation research. Rep. Investigations 7865. U. S. Dept. Int. Bureau of Mines
Li XB, Lok TS, Zhao J (2005) Dynamic characteristics of granite subjected to intermediate loading rate. Rock Mech Rock Eng 38:21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-004-0030-7
Li X, Zhou Z, Lok T-S, Hong L, Yin T (2008) Innovative testing technique of rock subjected to coupled static and dynamic loads. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:739–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.08.013
Li XF, Li HB, Zhang QB, Jiang JL, Zhao J (2018) Dynamic fragmentation of rock material: characteristic size, fragment distribution and pulverization law. Eng Fract Mech 199:739–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.024
Liu D, Li D, Zhao F, Wang C (2014) Fragmentation characteristics analysis of sandstone fragments based on impact rockburst test. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.04.001
Lockner D, Byerlee J, Kuksenko V, Ponomarev A, Sidorin A (1991) Quasi-static fault growth and shear fracture energy in granite. Nature 350:39–42
Millon O, Ruiz-Ripoll ML, Hoerth T (2016) Analysis of the behavior of sedimentary rocks under impact loading. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:4257–4272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1010-4
Mitchell E, Fialko Y, Brown K (2013) Temperature dependence of frictional healing of Westerly granite: experimental observations and numerical simulations. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 14:567–582
Nasseri MHB, Schubnel A, Young RP (2007) Coupled evolutions of fracture toughness and elastic wave velocities at high crack density in thermally treated Westerly granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:601–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.09.008
Nasseri MHB, Tatone BSA, Grasselli G, Young RP (2009) Fracture toughness and fracture roughness interrelationship in thermally treated westerly granite. Pure Appl Geophys 166:801–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-009-0476-3
Nemat-Nasser S, Isaacs JB, Starrett JE (1991) Hopkinson techniques for dynamic recovery experiments. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 435:371–391
Paterson MS, Wong TF (2005) Experimental rock deformation: the brittle field, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Rosin P, Rammler E (1933) The laws of governing the fineness of powdered coal. J Inst Fuel 7:29–36
Rutter E, Neumann D (1995) Experimental deformation of partially molten Westerly granite under fluid-absent conditions, with implications for the extraction of granitic magmas. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 100:15697–15715
Song B, Chen W (2004) Loading and unloading split Hopkinson pressure bar pulse-shaping techniques for dynamic hysteretic loops. Exp Mech 44:622–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428252
Xia K, Yao W (2015) Dynamic rock tests using split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar system—a review. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 7:27–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.07.008
Yao W, Xu Y, Yu C, Xia K (2017) A dynamic punch-through shear method for determining dynamic Mode II fracture toughness of rocks. Eng Fract Mech 176:161–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.012
Yao W, Xu Y, Xia K (2020) Damage evolution during rock pulverization induced by dynamic compressive loading. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 125:e2020JB019388. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jb019388
Zhang QB, Zhao J (2013a) Determination of mechanical properties and full-field strain measurements of rock material under dynamic loads. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60:423–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.01.005
Zhang QB, Zhao J (2013b) Effect of loading rate on fracture toughness and failure micromechanisms in marble. Eng Fract Mech 102:288–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.02.009
Zhou YX, Xia K, Li XB, Li HB, Ma GW, Zhao J, Zhou ZL, Dai F (2012) Suggested methods for determining the dynamic strength parameters and mode-I fracture toughness of rock materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 49:105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.10.004
Zhou Z, Cai X, Li X, Cao W, Du X (2020) Dynamic response and energy evolution of sandstone under coupled static-dynamic compression: insights from experimental study into deep rock engineering applications. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53:1305–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01980-9
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by Academy of Finland under grant number 322518.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Xing Li declares that he has no conflict of interest. Wei Yao declares that he has no conflict of interest. Chonglang Wang declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Yao, W. & Wang, C. The Influence of Multiple Dynamic Loading on Fragmentation Characteristics in Dynamic Compression Tests. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54, 1583–1596 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02324-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02324-8