Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Modelling of Water Flow Through Granular Material for Isolated and Simultaneous Extractions in Block Caving

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 23 July 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

In this work, we numerically solve the Brinkman–Darcy equation coupled to the granular kinematic model using the finite elements method in 2D, to describe the entry of water into draw points in Block Caving mining. We perform a total of 990 numerical simulations incorporating the relative change of local rock density (\(\Delta \rho /{\rho _p}\)), particle size (\({D_p}\)), extraction area (\(S\)) and the separation between draw points (\(L\)). We propose two mathematical models using scale arguments for estimating the velocity of the water in the draw point as a function of two and three dimensionless numbers (for isolated and simultaneous extractions, respectively). The relative error in the estimation of the results using the mathematical model for the set of numerical experiments ranges from 0.83 to 6.09%, where the greatest deviations correspond to \({D_p}\) = 6 mm. The proposed models allow estimating the water velocity at the draw point, which in turn helps to predict the time and place where there is a greater probability of a mud rush occurrence. The results can be applied in the design and optimisation of extraction sequences when the water present in the subsoil of a mine is a relevant factor to consider.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(modified from Nedderman 2005)

Fig. 2

[modified from Vivanco et al. (2011)]. \({v_p}\) velocity of particles, \({v_F}\) velocity of the dilatation front, \({\rho _p}\) density inside of the IMZ, \({\rho _0}\) density outside of the IMZ, and \(\Delta \rho\) local density change introduced by the rock motion

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 23 July 2019

    Unfortunately, the original article is published with a typing error, the equation.

  • 23 July 2019

    Unfortunately, the original article is published with a typing error, the equation.

Abbreviations

\(\vec {u}\) :

Velocity field of the fluid (m/s)

\(K\) :

Hydraulic conductivity, (m2)

\(\nabla\) :

Gradient of the hydraulic head (m−1)

\(\phi\) :

Porosity of the medium

\(\rho\) :

Fluid density (kg/m3)

\(k\) :

Intrinsic permeability of the medium, (m/s)

\(\mu\) :

Dynamic fluid viscosity (Pa s)

\(g\) :

Gravitational constant (m/s2)

\({D_p}\) :

Size grain (m)

\(Re\) :

Reynolds number

\(\upsilon ~\) :

Kinematic viscosity (m2/s)

\(\tau\) :

Stress tensor (MPa)

\(\nabla P\) :

Gradient of the fluid pressure (MPa/m)

\({u_{xp}}\) :

Horizontal velocity of particles (m/s)

\({u_{yp}}\) :

Vertical velocity of particles (m/s)

C :

Constant along streamlines

\(\pi\) :

Pi number

e :

Euler’s number

\({\rho _p}\) :

Density of the medium (particles) inside the IMZ (kg/m3)

\(\Delta \rho\) :

Local density change introduced by the rock motion (kg/m3)

\({\rho _0}\) :

Initial density or outside of the IMZ (kg/m3)

Q :

Extraction rate (e.g. in 2D m2/day or in 3D m3/day)

\({H_{{\text{IEZ}}}}\) :

Height of the isolated extraction zone (m)

\({W_{{\text{IEZ}}}}\) :

Width of the isolated extraction zone (m)

\(\overrightarrow {{v_F}}\) :

Velocity of the dilation front (m/s)

\(\overrightarrow {{v_p}}\) :

Particles velocity (m/s)

\({\text{d}}{y_f}~\) :

Displacement of the dilation front velocity (m)

H IMZ :

Height isolated movement zone (m)

W IMZ :

Width isolated movement zone (m)

\(\beta\) :

Convective velocity vector (m/s)

D :

Diffusion coefficient (m2/s)

F :

Arbitrary source term

\({c_{{\text{art}}}}\) :

Artificial diffusion coefficient

\({\delta _{{\text{id}}}}\) :

Tuning parameter of the artificial diffusion

\(h\) :

Mesh element size (m)

References

  • Alabi OO (2011) Validity of Darcy’s law in laminar regime. Electron J Geotech Eng 16:27–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora KR (2009) Soil mechanics and foundation engineering (geotechnical 7th engineering) edition. Standard Publishers Distributors, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard Y (1974) Nonlinear parameter estimation, vol 1209. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barenblatt GI (1996) Scaling, self-similarity, and intermediate asymptotics: dimensional analysis and intermediate asymptotics, vol 14. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bear J (1988) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Dover Publications Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear J, Bachmat Y (1990) Introduction to modeling phenomena of transport in porous media. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bear J, Cheng AHD (2010) Modelling groundwater flow and contaminant transport, vol 23. Springer, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmark JE (1975) The calculation of drift spacing and ring burden for sublevel caving. LKAB memo # RU 76-16

  • Brinkman HC (1947) A calculation of the viscosity and the sedimentation constant for solutions of large chain molecule staking into account the hampered flow of the solvent through these molecules. Physica 13:447–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham E (1914) On physically similar systems: illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Phys Rev 4:345–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher R, Joughin W, Stacey TR (2000) Methods of combating mudrushes on diamond and base metal mines. Safety in Mines Research Advisory Committee (SIMRAC), Johannesburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher R, Stacey TR, Joughin WC (2005) Mud rushes and methods of combating them. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 105:817–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Call and Nicholas(1998) IOZ wet muck study. PT Freeport internal report (Unpublished)

  • Caram H, Hong DC (1991) Random-walk approach to granular flows. Phys Rev Lett 67:828–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro R, Trueman R, Halim A (2007) A study of isolated draw zones in block caving mines by means of a large 3D physical model. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:860–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro R, Basaure K, Palma S, Vallejos J (2017) Geotechnical characterization of ore related to mudrushes in block caving mining. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 117:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen G (1997) Stochastic modeling of rock fragment flow under gravity. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dullien FA (1992) Porous media: fluid transport and pore structure, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlofsky L, Brady JF (1987) Analysis of the Brinkman equation as a model for flow in porous media. Phys Fluids 30:3329–3341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faghri A, Zhang Y (2006) Transport phenomena in multiphase systems, 1st edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts CR (2012) Groundwater science, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcés D, Castro R, Valencia ME, Armijo F (2016) Assessment of early mud entry risk for long term cave mining applications. 1st International Congress on Underground Mining U-Mining, Santiago, pp 428–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavin H (2011) The Levenberg–Marquardt method for nonlinear least squares curve-fitting problems. Course lectures:experimental systems. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham. http://people.duke.edu/~hpgavin/ce281/lm.pdf Accessed 31 May 2017

  • Ghidaoui MS, Kolyshkin AA (1999) Some global properties of flow in a heterogeneous isotropic porous medium. Mech Res Commun 26:161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbings JC (2011) Dimensional analysis. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock W, Weatherley D, Chitombo G (2012) Modeling the gravity flow of rock using the discrete element method. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference and exhibition on mass mining, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, 6972, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekmat A, Castro R, Navia I, Sánchez LK, Palma S (2016) Mud inflow risk assessment in block caving operation based on AHP comprehensive method. In: Proceedings of risk and resilience mining solution, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder A, Rogers AJ, Bartlett PJ, Keyter GJ (2013) Review of mud rush mitigation on Kimberley’s old scraper drift block caves. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 113:529–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam MF, Lye LM (2009) Combined use of dimensional analysis and modern experimental design methodologies in hydrodynamics experiments. Ocean Eng 36:237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakubec J, Clayton R, Guest A (2012) Mud rush risk evaluation. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference and exhibition on mass mining, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, 6860, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Janelid I, Kvapil R (1966) Sublevel caving. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 3:129–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasenow M (2002) Determination of hydraulic conductivity from grain size analysis. Water Resources Publication, LLC, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchta ME (2002) A revised form of the Bergmark-Roos equation for describing the gravity flow of broken rock. Miner Resour Eng 11:349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvapil R (1965) Gravity flow of granular materials in hoppers and bins in mines—II. Coarse material. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 2:277–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lara N (2014) Análisis histórico de las variables operacionales asociadas al ingreso de agua-barro en el sector Reserva Norte, División El Teniente, Codelco. Dissertation, Universidad de Chile

  • McCarthy PL, Harvey S (1998) Inrushes and subsidence, vol 3. Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • McNearny RL, Abel JF (1993) Large-scale two-dimensional block caving model tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 30:93–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo F, Vivanco F, Fuentes C, Apablaza V (2007) On drawbody shapes: from Bergmark–Roos to kinematic models. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo F, Vivanco F, Fuentes C, Apablaza V (2008) Kinematic model for quasi-static granular displacements in block caving: dilatancy effects on drawbody shapes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:248–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo F, Vivanco F, Fuentes C (2009) Calculated isolated extracted and movement zones compared to scaled models for block caving. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:731–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins WW (1972) Stochastic theory of particle flow under gravity. J Appl Phys 43:665–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navia IM (2014) Análisis del ingreso de agua-barro al sector Diablo Regimiento, División El Teniente. Dissertation, Universidad de Chile

  • Nedderman RM (2005) Statics and kinematics of granular materials, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedderman RM, Tüzün U (1979) A kinematic model for the flow of granular materials. Powder Tech 22:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen HD (1995) Probabilistic modeling of moisture flow in layered vadose zone: applications to waste site performance assessment. Int J Eng Sci 33:1345–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nield DA, Bejan A (2006) Convection in porous media, 3rd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmstrom A, Stille H (2007) Ground behaviour and rock engineering tools for underground excavations. Tunn Undergr Space Tech 22:363–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters DC (1984) Physical modeling of the draw behavior of broken rock in caving. Colo Sch Mines Q 79:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Power GR (2004) Modelling granular flow in caving mines: large scale physical modelling and full scale experiments. Dissertation, The University of Queensland

  • Rustan A (2000) Gravity flow of broken rock: What is known and unknown. In: Proceedings of the third international conference and exhibition on mass mining, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Brisbane, pp 557–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Samadani A, Pradhan A, Kudrolli A (1999) Size segregation of granular matter in silo discharges. Phys Rev E 60:7203. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.7203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samosir E, Basuni J, Widijanto E, Syaifullah T (2008) The management of wet muck at PT Freeport Indonesia’s deep ore zone mine. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference and exhibition on mass mining, LuleåUniversity of Technology, Luleå, pp 323–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel F (2014) Understanding stabilization methods. Comsol blog: technical content. COMSOL, Inc., Burlington. https://www.comsol.com/blogs/understanding-stabilization-methods. Accessed 14 Aug 2018

  • Shamey R, Zhao X (2014) Modelling, simulation and control of the dyeing process. Woodhead Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi Z, Wang X (2007) Comparison of Darcy’s law. the Brinkman equation, the modified NS equation and the pure diffusion equation in PEM fuel cell modeling. In: Proceedings of the COMSOL conference 2007, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Szirtes T (2007) Applied dimensional analysis and modeling, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabaian M (2014) COMSOL for engineers. Mercury learning and information, Dulles

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd DK (1980) Groundwater hydrology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueman R, Castro R, Halim A (2008) Study of multiple draw-zone interaction in block caving mines by means of a large 3D physical model. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:1044–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuller M, Or D (2002) Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of structured porous media. Vadose Zone J 1:14–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valencia M, Basaure K, Castro R, Vallejo J (2014) Towards an understanding of mud rush behaviour in block-panel caving mines. 3erCongreso Internacional en Block Caving, Santiago, pp 363–371

  • Vallejos J, Basaure K, Palma S, Castro R (2017) Methodology for a risk evaluation of mud rushes in block caving mining. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 117:491–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Golf-Racht TD (1982) Fundamentals of fractured reservoir engineering, vol 12. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivanco F, Melo F (2013) The effect of rock decompaction on the interaction of movement zones in underground mining. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60:381–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivanco F, Watt T, Melo F (2011) The 3D shape of the loosening zone above multiple draw points in block caving through plasticity model with a dilation front. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:406–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic M, Soro A (1992) Determination of hydraulic conductivity of porous media from grain-size distribution. Water Resources Publications, Littleton

    Google Scholar 

  • Vutukuri VS, Singh RN (1995) Mine inundation-case histories. Mine Water Environ 14:107–130

    Google Scholar 

  • White FM (2008) Mecánica de fluidos, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicaksono D, Silalahi K, Sryanto I, Soebari L, Ekaputra A, De Jong G (2012) Potential hazard map for the wet muck flow prevention at the deep ore zone (DOZ) block cave mine, Papua, Indonesia. In: Proceeding TPT XXI PERHAPS, pp 87–95

  • Widijanto E, Sunyoto WS, Wilson A, Yudanto W, Soebari L (2012) Lessons learned in wet muck management in Erstberg East Skarn system of PT Freeport Indonesia. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference and exhibition on mass mining, Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, 6780, Ontario

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Grant “PiensaCobre” under the auspices of the Corporación Nacional del Cobre de Chile (CODELCO) and the Centre for Mathematical Modelling (CMM) of the University of Chile. The authors are greatly grateful to the Block Caving Laboratory and Advanced Mining Technology Center (AMTC) of the University of Chile. The authors thank H. Rivera and J.P. Le Roux and Xavier Emery for providing much-appreciated comments, which helped to improve the clarity of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Palma.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sánchez, K., Palma, S. & Castro, R.L. Numerical Modelling of Water Flow Through Granular Material for Isolated and Simultaneous Extractions in Block Caving. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52, 133–147 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1587-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1587-x

Keywords

Navigation