Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Liquid CO2 Fracturing: Effect of Fluid Permeation on the Breakdown Pressure and Cracking Behavior

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Liquid CO2 fracturing is a promising alternative to hydraulic fracturing since it can circumvent problems stemming from the use of water. One of the most significant differences between liquid CO2 and hydraulic fracturing processes is that liquid CO2 permeates into matrix pores very rapidly due to its low viscosity. Here we study how this rapid permeation of liquid CO2 impacts a range of features during the course of the fracturing process, with a focus on the breakdown pressure and cracking behavior. We first conduct a series of laboratory fracturing experiments that inject liquid CO2, water, and oil into nominally identical mortar specimens with various pressurization rates. We quantitatively measure the volumes of fluids permeated into the specimens and investigate how these permeated volumes are related to breakdown and fracture initiation pressures and pressurization efficiency. The morphology of the fractures generated by different types of fluids is also examined using 3D X-ray computed tomographic imaging. Subsequently, the cracking processes due to injection of liquid CO2 and water are further investigated by numerical simulations employing a phase-field approach to fracture in porous media. Simulation results show that rapid permeation of liquid CO2 gives rise to a substantial pore pressure buildup and distributed microcracks prior to the major fracture propagation stage. The experimental and numerical results commonly indicate that significant fluid permeation during liquid CO2 fracturing is a primary reason for its lower breakdown pressure and more distributed fractures compared with hydraulic fracturing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amor H, Marigo J-J, Maurini C (2009) Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: numerical experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 57:1209–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangerth W, Hartmann R, Kanschat G (2007) Deal. II—a general-purpose object-oriented finite element library. ACM T Math Softw 33:24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith R (2010) Hydraulic fracturing: the fuss, the facts, the future. J Petrol Technol 62:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennour Z, Ishida T, Nagaya Y, Chen Y, Nara Y, Chen Q, Sekine K, Nagano Y (2015) Crack extension in hydraulic fracturing of shale cores using viscous oil, water, and liquid carbon dioxide. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(4):1463–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borden MJ, Hughes TJ, Landis CM, Anvari A, Lee IJ (2016) A phase-field formulation for fracture in ductile materials: finite deformation balance law derivation, plastic degradation, and stress triaxiality effects. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 312:130–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borja RI, Choo J (2016) Cam–Clay plasticity, Part VIII: a constitutive framework for porous materials with evolving internal structure. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 309:653–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cajuhi T, Sanavia L, De Lorenzis L (2017) Phase-field modeling of fracture in variably saturated porous media. Comput Mech https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1459-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Carter KE (2016) Water usage for natural gas production through hydraulic fracturing in the United States from 2008 to 2014. J Environ Manag 170:152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Nagaya Y, Ishida T (2015) Observations of fractures induced by hydraulic fracturing in anisotropic granite. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:1455–1461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0727-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitrala Y, Sondergeld CH, Rai CS (2012) Microseismic Studies of Hydraulic Fracture Evolution at Different Pumping Rates. In: SPE Americas Unconventional Resources Conference, 5–7 June, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

  • Choo J, Borja RI (2015) Stabilized mixed finite elements for deformable porous media with double porosity. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 293:131–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choo J, Sun W (2018a) Coupled phase-field and plasticity modeling of geological materials: from brittle fracture to ductile flow. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 330:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choo J, Sun WC (2018b) Cracking and damage from crystallization in pores: coupled chemo-hydro-mechanics and phase-field modeling. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 335:347–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choo J, White JA, Borja RI (2016) Hydromechanical modeling of unsaturated flow in double porosity media. Int J Geomech 16(6):D4016002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Borst R, Verhoosel CV (2016) Gradient damage vs phase-field approaches for fracture: similarities and differences. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 312:78–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deichmann N, Giardini D (2009) Earthquakes induced by the stimulation of an enhanced geothermal system below Basel (Switzerland). Seismol Res Lett 80:784–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francfort GA, Marigo J-J (1998) Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids 46:1319–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallegos TJ, Varela BA, Haines SS, Engle MA (2015) Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications. Water Resour Res 51:5839–5845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan Q, Elsworth D, Alpern J, Marone C, Connolly P (2015) Breakdown pressures due to infiltration and exclusion in finite length boreholes. J Petrol Sci Eng 127:329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandossi L (2013) An overview of hydraulic fracturing and other formation stimulation technologies for shale gas production. Eur Commission Jt Res Cent Tech Rep

  • Gregory KB, Vidic RD, Dzombak DA (2011) Water management challenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing. Elements 7:181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo F, Morgenstern N, Scott J (1993) Interpretation of hydraulic fracturing breakdown pressure. Int J Rock Mech Min 30:617–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(93)91221-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo T, Zhang S, Qu Z, Zhou T, Xiao Y, Gao J (2014) Experimental study of hydraulic fracturing for shale by stimulated reservoir volume. Fuel 128:373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha SJ, Yun TS, Kim KY, Jung SG (2017) Experimental study of pumping rate effect on hydraulic fracturing of cement paste and mortar. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:3115–3119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishida T, Chen Y, Bennour Z, Yamashita H, Inui S, Nagaya Y, Naoi M, Chen Q, Nakayama Y, Nagano Y (2016) Features of CO2 fracturing deduced from acoustic emission and microscopy in laboratory experiments. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121:8080–8098. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohshou IO, Barati R, Yorro MC, Leshchyshyn T, Adejumo AT, Ahmed U, Kugler I, Reynolds M, McAndrew J (2017) Economic assessment and review of waterless fracturing technologies in shale resource development: a case study. J Earth Sci China 28:933–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraft T, Mai PM, Wiemer S, Deichmann N, Ripperger J, Kästli P, Bachmann C, Fäh D, Wössner J, Giardini D (2009) Enhanced geothermal systems: mitigating risk in urban areas. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 90:273–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecampion B, Bunger A, Zhang X (2018) Numerical methods for hydraulic fracture propagation: a review of recent trends. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 49:66–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Wheeler MF, Wick T (2016) Pressure and fluid-driven fracture propagation in porous media using an adaptive finite element phase field model. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 305:111–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majer EL, Baria R, Stark M, Oates S, Bommer J, Smith B, Asanuma H (2007) Induced seismicity associated with enhanced geothermal systems. Geothermics 36:185–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauthe S, Miehe C (2017) Hydraulic fracture in poro-hydro-elastic media. Mech Res Commun 80:69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miehe C, Mauthe S (2016) Phase field modeling of fracture in multi-physics problems. Part III. Crack driving forces in hydro-poro-elasticity and hydraulic fracturing of fluid-saturated porous media. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 304:619–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 199:2765–2778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moridis G (2017) Literature review and analysis of waterless fracturing methods. Report Number: LBNL-1007287

  • Osborn SG, Vengosh A, Warner NR, Jackson RB (2011) Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:8172–8176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng P, Ju Y, Wang Y, Wang S, Gao F (2017) Numerical analysis of the effect of natural microcracks on the supercritical CO2 fracturing crack network of shale rock based on bonded particle models. Int J Numer Anal Met 41:1992–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmadivaleh M, Rasouli V (2015) Test design and sample preparation procedure for experimental investigation of hydraulic fracturing interaction modes. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(1):93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santillan D, Juanes R, Cueto-Felgueroso L (2018) Phase-field model of hydraulic fracturing in poroelastic media: fracture propagation, arrest and branching under fluid injection and extraction. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 123(3):2127–2155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool BK (2014) Cornucopia or curse? Reviewing the costs and benefits of shale gas hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Renew Sust Energ Rev 37:249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanchits S, Surdi A, Gathogo P, Edelman E, Suarez-Rivera R (2014) Onset of hydraulic fracture initiation monitored by acoustic emission and volumetric deformation measurements. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:1521–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0584-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vengosh A, Jackson RB, Warner N, Darrah TH, Kondash A (2014) A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 48:8334–8348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan J (2017) Report on developing a US-China joint project on CO2-based fracturing techniques. Report Number: LBNL-1007288

  • Wang C, Wang F, Du H, Zhang X (2014) Is China really ready for shale gas revolution—Re-evaluating shale gas challenges. Environ Sci Policy 39:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Yao B, Cha M, Alqahtani N, Patterson T, Kneafsey T, Miskimins J, Yin X, Wu Y (2016) Waterless fracturing technologies for unconventional reservoirs-opportunities for liquid nitrogen. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 35:160–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.08.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Elsworth D, Wu Y, Liu J, Zhu W, Liu Y (2018) The influence of fracturing fluids on fracturing processes: a comparison between water, oil and sc-CO2. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(1):229–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White JA, Borja RI (2008) Stabilized low-order finite elements for coupled solid-deformation/fluid-diffusion and their application to fault zone transients. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 197:4353–4366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White JA, Castelletto N, Tchelepi HA (2016) Block-partitioned solvers for coupled poromechanics: a unified framework. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 303:55–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Lu Y, Tang J, Zhou Z, Liao Y (2017a) Experimental study on fracture initiation and propagation in shale using supercritical carbon dioxide fracturing. Fuel 190:370–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Sloan SW, Vignes C, Sheng D (2017b) A modification of the phase-field model for mixed mode crack propagation in rock-like materials. Comput Method Appl M 322:123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Liu C, Yang H, Li Y (2015) Strategic questions about China’s shale gas development. Environ Earth Sci 73:6059–6068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoback MD, Pollard DD (1978) Hydraulic fracture propagation and the interpretation of pressure-time records for in-situ stress determinations. In: 19th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS)

  • Zoback M, Rummel F, Jung R, Raleigh C (1977) Laboratory hydraulic fracturing experiments in intact and pre-fractured rock. Int J Rock Mech Min 14:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(77)90196-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIP) (Nos. 2011–0030040 and 2016R1A2B4011292). The second author acknowledges financial support from the Seed Fund for Basic Research for New Staff of The University of Hong Kong.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, South Korea

    Seong Jun Ha & Tae Sup Yun

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong

    Jinhyun Choo

Authors
  1. Seong Jun Ha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinhyun Choo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tae Sup Yun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae Sup Yun.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ha, S.J., Choo, J. & Yun, T.S. Liquid CO2 Fracturing: Effect of Fluid Permeation on the Breakdown Pressure and Cracking Behavior. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51, 3407–3420 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1542-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1542-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation