Skip to main content
Log in

Determining the Viscosity Coefficient for Viscoelastic Wave Propagation in Rock Bars

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rocks with microdefects exhibit viscoelastic behavior during stress wave propagation. The viscosity coefficient of the wave can be used to characterize the attenuation as the wave propagates in rock. In this study, a long artificial bar with a readily adjustable viscosity coefficient was fabricated to investigate stress wave attenuation. The viscoelastic behavior of the artificial bar under dynamic loading was investigated, and the initial viscoelastic coefficient was obtained based on the amplitude attenuation of the incident harmonic wave. A one-dimensional wave propagation program was compiled to reproduce the time history of the stress wave measured during the experiments, and the program was well fitted to the Kelvin–Voigt model. The attenuation and dispersion of the stress wave in long artificial viscoelastic bars were quantified to accurately determine the viscoelastic coefficient. Finally, the method used to determine the viscoelastic coefficient of a long artificial bar based on the experiments and numerical simulations was extended to determine the viscoelastic coefficient of a short rock bar. This study provides a new method of determining the viscosity coefficient of rock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

E :

Elastic modulus of the spring

E 1 :

Elastic modulus of segment I

E 2 :

Elastic modulus of segment II

\({\mathcal{F}}\) :

Application of the Fourier transform

Im:

Imaginary parts of a complex expression

k :

Wave number of a harmonic wave

k 1 :

Wave number of a stress wave

l :

Wave travel distance between two points, P1 and P2

T I–II :

Transmission coefficient as the strain wave propagates from segment I to segment II

T II–I :

Transmission coefficient as the strain wave propagates from segment II to segment I

Re:

Real parts of a complex expression

t :

Time

u 0 :

Amplitude of incident wave displacement

u :

Particle displacement

v :

Particle velocity

x :

Cartesian coordinate along the wave propagation path

α x :

Wave attenuation of the harmonic wave

β :

Attenuation coefficient as the strain wave propagates between point P1 and P2

ε :

Strain of the Kelvin–Voigt model

ε 1 :

Strain wave measured at point P1

ε 2 :

Strain wave measured at point P2

ε L1 :

Amplitude of the strain wave measured at point P1 during the impact test at L-end

ε L2 :

Amplitude of the strain wave measured at point P2 during the impact test at L-end

ε R1 :

Amplitude of the strain wave measured at point P1 during the impact test at R-end

ε R2 :

Amplitude of the strain wave measured at point P2 during the impact test at R-end

ε s :

Simulated strain

ε t :

Experimental strain

η :

Viscoelastic coefficient of the dashpot

ξ :

Relative error

ρ :

Density of the medium material

σ :

Stress of the Kelvin–Voigt model

ω :

Harmonic angular frequency after Fourier transform

ω 1 :

Angular frequency

References

  • Altshuler LV, Doronin GS, Kim GK (1987) Viscosity of shock compressed liquids. Appl Mech Tech Phys 6:110–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon C (1998) An experimental method for considering dispersion and attenuation in a viscoelastic Hopkinson bar. Exp Mech 38(4):242–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandis SC, Lumsden AC, Barton NR (1983) Fundamentals of rock joint deformation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 20(6):249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benatar A, Rittel D, Yarin AL (2003) Theoretical and experimental analysis of longitudinal wave propagation in cylindrical viscoelastic rods. J Mech Phys Solids 51:1413–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee AK, Mal AK (1978) Elastic moduli of two-component systems. J Geophys Res 83:1785–1792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampin S (1984) Effective anisotropic elastic constants for wave propagation through cracked solids. Geophys J R Astron Soc 76:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshelby JD (1957) The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proc R Soc Lond 241(1226):376–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan LF, Ma GW, Li JC (2012a) Nonlinear viscoelastic medium equivalence for stress wave propagation in a jointed rock mass. Int J Rock Mech Min 50:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan LF, Ma GW, Wong LNY (2012b) Effective viscoelastic behaviour of rock mass with double-scale discontinuities. Geophys J Int 191:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan LF, Ren F, Ma GW (2012c) Experimental study on viscoelastic behavior of sedimentary rock under dynamic loading. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:433–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan LF, Wong LNY, Ma GW (2013) Experimental investigation and modeling of viscoelastic behavior of concrete. Constr Build Mater 48:814–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JA (1988) Seismic wave propagation through material containing partially saturated cracks. Geophys J Int 92(1):33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JA, Pointer T, Liu E (2001) Effective-medium theories for fluid-saturated materials with aligned cracks. Geophys Prospect 49(5):509–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger JC, Cook NGW, Zimmerman RW (2007) Fundamentals of rock mechanics. Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolsky H (1953) Stress waves in solids. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau LD, Lifshits EM (1959) Theory of elasticity. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Li JC, Ma GW, Zhao J (2010) An equivalent viscoelastic model for rock mass with parallel joints. J Geophys Res 115:B03305

    Google Scholar 

  • Li JC, Li HB, Zhao J (2014) Study on wave propagation across a single rough fracture by the modified thin-layer interface model. J Appl Geophys 110:106–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li JC, Li HB, Zhao J (2015) An improved equivalent viscoelastic medium method for wave propagation across layered rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min 73:62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg B, Blanc RH (1988) Determination of mechanical material properties from the two-point response of an impacted linearly viscoelastic rod specimen. J Sound Vib 126(1):97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma GW, Fan LF, Li JC (2013) Evaluation of equivalent medium methods for stress wave propagation in jointed rock mass. Int J Numer Anal Methods 37:701–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markov M, Levine V, Mousatov A, Kazatchenko E (2005) Elastic properties of double-porosity rocks using the differential effective medium model. Geophys Prospect 53(5):733–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers MA (1994) Dynamic behavior of materials. Wiley, Montgomery

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nur A (1971) Effects of stress on velocity anisotropy in rock with cracks. J Geophys Res 76(8):2022–2034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nur A, Simmons G (1969) Stress-induced velocity anisotropy in rock: an experimental study. J Geophys Res 74(27):6667–6674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell RJ, Budiansky B (1974) Seismic velocities in dry and saturated cracked solids. J Geophys Res 79(35):5412–5425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi CZ, Wang MY, Qian QH (2009) Strain-rate effects on the strength and fragmentation size of rocks. Int J Impact Eng 3:1355–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravichandran G, Subhash G (1994) Critical appraisal of limiting strain rates for compression testing of ceramics in a split Hopkinson pressure bar. J Am Ceram Soc 77(1):263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayers CM, Kachanov M (1991) A simple technique for finding effective elastic constants of cracked solids for arbitrary crack orientation statistics. Int J Solids Struct 27:671–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepanov GV, Kharchenko VV (1984) Relation between stress and strain in metals under impulsive action. Probl Strength 11:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai YM, Kolsky H (1968) Surface wave propagation for linear viscoelastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 16:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu JB, Perino A, Zhao GF, Barla G, Li JC, Ma GW, Zhao J (2011) Seismic response of a single and a set of filled joints of viscoelastic deformational behavior. Geophys J Int 186:1315–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu JB, Zhao XB, Wu W, Zhao J (2012) Wave propagation across rock joints filled with viscoelastic medium using modified recursive method. J Appl Geophys 86:82–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu WC, Niu LL, Li SH, Xu ZH (2015) Dynamic Brazilian test of rock under intermediate strain rate: pendulum hammer-driven SHPB test and numerical simulation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:1867–1881

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0801607), National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51525402, 51374049, 51574060 and 51534003), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant No. N160103005). These sources of support are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wancheng Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niu, L., Zhu, W., Li, S. et al. Determining the Viscosity Coefficient for Viscoelastic Wave Propagation in Rock Bars. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51, 1347–1359 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1407-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1407-3

Keywords

Navigation