Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental and Model Studies on Loading Path-Dependent and Nonlinear Gas Flow Behavior in Shale Fractures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interest in shale gas as an energy source is growing worldwide. Because the rock’s natural fracture system can contribute to gas production, it is important to understand the flow behavior of natural fractures in shale. Previous studies on the flow characteristics in shale fractures were limited and did not consider the effect of nonlinearity. To understand the basic mechanics of the gas flow behavior in shale fractures, laboratory investigations with consideration of the fluid pressure gradient, the confining stress, the loading history and the fracture geometry were conducted in this paper. Izbash’s equation was used to analyze the nonlinearity of the flow. The results show that the behavior of the friction factors is similar to that shown in flow tests in smooth and rough pipes. The increase of the confining stress and the irreversible damage to the shale decreased the hydraulic aperture and increased the relative roughness. Thus, turbulent flow could appear at a low Reynolds number, resulting in a significant pressure loss. The limits of the cubic law and the existing correction factor for transmissivity are discussed. It is found that the previous friction models overestimate the friction factor in the laminar regime and underestimate the friction factor in the turbulent regime. For this reason, a new friction model based on a linear combination of the Reynolds number and the relative roughness was developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandis SC, Lumsden AC, Barton NR (1983) Fundamentals of rock joint deformation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 20:249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Quadros EF (1997) Joint aperture and roughness in the prediction of flow and groutability of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:3–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Bandis SC, Bakhtar K (1985) Strength, deformation, conductivity coupling of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 22(2):121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordier C, Zimmer D (2000) Drainage equations and non-Darcian modelling in coarse porous media or geosynthetic materials. J Hydrol 228:174–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulon MJ, Selvadurai APS, Benjelloun H et al (1993) Influence of rock joint degradation on hydraulic conductivity. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 30(7):1311–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colebrook FC (1939) Turbulent flow in pipes with particular reference to the transition region between the smooth and rough pipe laws. J Inst Civ Eng 11:133–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forchheimer PH (1901) Wasserbewegung durch Boden. Zeitschrift des Vereines Deutscher Ingenierre 49(50):1736–1749

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredd CN, Mcconnell SB, Boney CL et al (2001) Experimental study of fracture conductivity for water-fracturing and conventional fracturing applications. SPE J 6(3):288–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo TK, Zhang SC, Gao J et al (2013) Experimental study of fracture permeability for stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) in Shale formation. Transp Porous Media 90:525–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irmay S (1958) On the theoretical derivation of Darcy and Forchheimer formulas. Trans Am Geophys Union 39(4):702–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranz RL, Frankel AD, Engelder T et al (1979) The permeability of whole and jointed Barre Granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 16(4):225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake PHSW, Shou G, Huang TH et al (1995) New peak shear strength criteria for anisotropic rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 32(7):673–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomize GM (1951) Flow in fractured rocks. Gosenergoisdat, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis C (1971) A study of groundwater flow in jointed rock and its influence on the stability of rock masses. In: Rock mechanics research report 10, Imperial College

  • Maerz NH, Franklin JA, Bennett CP (1990) Joint roughness measurement using shadow profilometry. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 27:329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody LF (1944) Friction factors for pipe flow. ASME Trans 66:671–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Nist (2016) Thermochemical properties of fluid systems. http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/fluid/. Accessed 20 Oct 2016

  • Olsson R, Barton N (2001) An improved model for hydromechanical coupling during shearing of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38(3):317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman A, Ahmadi G, Issen KA et al (2012) Permeability of fractured media under confining pressure: a simplified model. Open Petrol Eng J 5(1):36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KK, Sigh DN, Ranjith PG (2015) Laboratory simulation of flow through single fractured granite. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:987–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JB, Carrano AL, Kandlikar SG (2006) Characterization of the effect of surface roughness and texture on fluid flow-past, present, and future. Int J Therm Sci 45:962–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang YW, Witherspoon PA (1981) Hydromechanical behavior of a deformable rock fracture subject to normal stress. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 86(B10):9287–9298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turk N, Dearman WR(1985) Investigation of some rock joint properties: roughness angle determination and joint closure. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on fundamentals of rock joints, Björkliden, pp 197–204

  • Venkataraman BP, Rao PRM (1998) Darcian, transitional, and turbulent flow through porous media. J Hydraul Eng 124:840–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White FM (2003) Fluid mechanics. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Witherspoon JSY, Wang KI, Gale JE (1980) Validity of cubic law for fluid-flow in a deformable rock fracture. Water Resour Res 16:1016–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong LNY, Li D, Liu G (2013) Experimental studies on permeability of intact and singly jointed meta-sedimentary rocks under confining pressure. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:107–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyckoff RD, Botset HG, Muskat M et al (1993) The measurement of the permeability of porous media for homogeneous fluids. Rev Sci Instrum 4:394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao W, Xia C, Wei W (2011) Study of void model for fluid flow through rough joint by considering 3d topography characteristics. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 30:3786–3795

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo IW, Freitas MHD, Zimmerman RW (1998) Effect of shear displacement on the aperture and permeability of a rock fracture. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35(8):1051–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZY, Nemcik J (2013) Friction factor of water flow through rough rock fractures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:1125–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JJ, Kamenov A, Zhu D et al (2015a) Measurement of realistic fracture conductivity in the barnett shale. J Unconven Oil Gas Resour 11:44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZY, Nemcik J, Qiao QQ et al (2015b) A model for water flow through rock fractures based on friction factor. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:559–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou T, Zhang SC, Feng Y et al (2016) Experimental study of permeability characteristics for the cemented natural fracture of the shale gas formation. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 29:345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman RW, Bodvarsson GS (1996) Hydraulic conductivity of rock fractures. Transp Porous Media 23:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman RW, Chen DW, Cook NGW (1992) The effect of contact area on the permeability of fractures. J Hydrol 139(1–4):79–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman RW, Al-Yaarubi A, Pain CC et al (2004) Non-linear regimes of fluid flow in rock fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(3):163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is jointly supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (No. 2014CB239206), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (51404045), the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of China (No. IRT13043) and Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology (No. CSTC2017JCYJB0252).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiren Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Lu, Y., Zhou, L. et al. Experimental and Model Studies on Loading Path-Dependent and Nonlinear Gas Flow Behavior in Shale Fractures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51, 227–242 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1296-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1296-x

Keywords

Navigation