References
Amadei B, Wobowo J, Sture S, Price RH (1998) Applicability of existing models to predict the behavior of replicas of natural fractures of welded tuff under different boundary conditions. Geotech Geo Eng 16:79–128
Arthaud F (1969) Méthode de détermination graphique des directions de raccourcissement, d’allongement et intermédiaire d’une population de failles. Bull Soc Géol de France 7(XI):729–737
Barton N, Bandis S (1990) Review of predictive capabilities of JRC-JCS model in engineering practice. In: Barton N, Stephansson SG (eds) Rock joints, vol 5. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 603–610 (ISBN:90 6191 109)
Barton N, Choubey V (1977) Shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Int J Rock Mech Sci Geomech Abstr 10:1–54
Cappa F, Guglielmi Y, Fénart P, Merrien-Soukatchoff V, Thoraval A (2005) Hydromechanical interactions in a fractured carbonate reservoir inferred from hydraulic and mechanical measurements. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42:287–306
Cappa F, Guglielmi Y, Rutqvist J, Tsang C-F, Thoraval A (2008) Estimation of fracture flow parameters through numerical analysis of hydromechanical pulses. Water Resour Res 44(W11408):1–15
Cooper HH, Bredehoeft JD, Papadopoulos IS (1967) Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Water Resour Res 3(1):263–269
Guglielmi Y, Cappa F, Rutqvist J, Tsang C-F, Thoraval A (2008) Mesoscale characterization of coupled hydromechanical behavior of a fractured-porous slope in response to free water-surface movement. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42:852–878
Hack HRGK (1993) Slopes in rock. Proc An Overview of Engineering Geology in the Netherlands Ed DIG, Technical University Felft, The Netherlands, pp 111–119
Haimson BC, Cornet FH (2003) ISRM suggested methods for rock stress estimation—Part 3: hydraulic fracturing (HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF). Int J R Mech Min Sci 40:1011–1020
Hoek E, Bray J (1974) Rock slope engineering. Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London
ISRM (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods, International Society for Rock Mechanics, compilation arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group, KozanOfset, Ankara, Turkey
Jaeger JC, Cook NGW, Zimmerman R (2007) Fundamentals of rock mechanics, 4th edn. Blackwell, Oxford, p 475
Ladanyi B, Archambault G (1970) Simulation of shear behaviour of a jointed rock mass. In: Proceedings of the 11th Symp. On Rock Mech. (AIME), pp 105–125
McFarland J, Morris A, Bichon B, Riha D, Ferrill D, McGinnis R (2011) Geological stress state calibration and uncertainty analysis. Structural dynamics, vol. 3. In: Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, pp 557–570
Morris A, Ferrill DA, Henderson DB (1996) Slip-tendency analysis and fault reactivation. Geology 24(3):275–278
Patton FD (1966) Multiple modes of shear of failure in rock. Proceedings of 1st Cong Int Soc Rock Mech, Lisbon, pp 509–513
Plesha ME (1987) Constitutive models for rock discontinuities with dilatancy and surface degradation. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 11:345–362
Rutqvist J, Tsang CF, Stephansson O (1998) Determination of fracture storativity in hard rocks using high pressure testing. Water Resour Res 34:2551–2560
Saeb S, Amadei B (1992) Modelling rock joints under shear and normal loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 29:267–278
Schweisinger T, Swenson EJ, Murdoch LC (2009) Introduction to hydromechanical well tests in fractured rock aquifers. Groundwater 47(1):69–79
Vasco DW (2009) Modeling broad-band poroelastic propagation using an asymptotic approach. PDF from scholarship.org. Geophys J Int Wiley Online Libr 179(1):299–318
Vasco DW, Minkoff SE (2009) Modelling flow in a pressure-sensitive, heterogeneous medium. Geophys J Int 179:972–989
Witherspoon PF, Wang JSY, Iwai K, Gale JE (1980) Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Water Resour Res 16(6):1016–1024
Acknowledgments
The SIMFIP method and probe developments were funded by the ANR “Captage de CO2” through the “HPPP-CO2” project and by the ADEME through the “mHPP” project. The contribution by LBNL authors in developing this report was funded by the US Department of Energy under contract No.DE-AC02-05CH11231. The authors thank the SITES S.A.S engineers Hervé Caron, Cédric Micollier, Regis Blin, Nicolas Bossard, Jérémie Durand and the Petrometalic S.A. engineers, who are employed by the two companies that develop and operate the probe instrument which allows the in situ pressure/displacement measurements.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Please send any written comments on this ISRM Suggested Method to Prof. Resat Ulusay, President of the ISRM Commission on Testing Methods, Hacettepe University, Department of Geological Engineering, 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guglielmi, Y., Cappa, F., Lançon, H. et al. ISRM Suggested Method for Step-Rate Injection Method for Fracture In-Situ Properties (SIMFIP): Using a 3-Components Borehole Deformation Sensor. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47, 303–311 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0517-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0517-1