Skip to main content
Log in

Application of Rock Mass Characterization for Determining the Mechanical Properties of Rock Mass: a Comparative Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 18 April 2017

Abstract

The results of geotechnical explorations, engineering geological investigation (including laboratory and in situ tests) and field observations have been used, along with borehole logging charts, to obtain the rock mass geotechnical data. Based on the data, the rock mass along the Sabzkuh water conveyance tunnel route was classified by rock mass rating (RMR), Q-system (Q), rock mass index (RMi) and geological strength index (GSI) (3 methods). A new series of correlations were established between the systems based on the data collected from the study area. These relationships were then compared with those reported in the literature, and two new relations were recommended. The classifications were utilized to calculate mechanical properties (rock mass strength and deformation modulus) of the rock mass along the tunnel according to available empirical relations, and to distinguish the upper-bound and lower-bound relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abad J, Caleda B, Chacon E, Gutierrez V, Hidlgo E (1984) Application of geomechanical classification to predict the convergence of coal mine galleries and to design their supports. In: 5th Inter. Cong. Rock Mech., Melbourne, pp 15–19

  • Ajalloeian R, Hashemi M, Mogshaddas Sh (2004) The Engineering Geology Assessment of Sabzkuh Water Conveyance Tunnel Route, Central Iran, In: Viana da Fonseca & Mayne (eds) Proc. Int. Conf. on Site Characterization (ISC-2), Porto, Portugal, pp 1397–1402

  • Al-Harthi AA (1993) Application of CSIR and NGI classification systems along tunnel no. 3 at Al-Dela Descant, Asir Province, Saudi Arabia. In: Cripps JC, Coulthard JM, Culshaw MG, Forster A, Hencher SR, Moon CF (eds) The Engineering geology of weak rock. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 323–328

  • Aydan Ö, Dalgiç S (1998) Prediction of deformation behaviour of 3-lanes Bolu tunnels through squeezing rocks of North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ). Regional symposium on sedimentary rock engineering, Taipei, pp 228–233

  • Barton N (1995) The influence of joint properties in modelling jointed rock masses. Keynote Lecture. In: 8th Cong. ISRM, Tokyo

  • Barton N (2002) Some new Q value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:185–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Lien NR, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech 6(4):189–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhasin R, Grimstaad E (1996) The use of stress–strength relationship in the assessment of tunnel stability. Tunnel Under Space Tech 11(1):93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1973) Engineering classification of jointed rock masses. Trans S Afr Inst Civil Eng 15(12):335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1976) Rock mass classification in rock engineering. In: Proc. Symp. On Expl. For Rock Eng. Johannesburg, South Africa, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 97–106

  • Bieniawski ZT (1978) Determining rock mass deformability: experience from case histories. Inter J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15:237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classifications. Wiley, New York, p 251

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai M, Kaiser PK, Uno H, Tasaka Y, Minami M (2004) Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus and strength of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI method. Inter J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron-Clarke IS, Budavari S (1981) Correlation of rock mass classification parameters obtained from borecore and in situ observations. Eng Geol 17:19–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU, Henderson AJ, Patton FD, Cording EJ (1967) Design of Surface and near surface construction in rock. In: Proc. 8th US Symp. Rock Mech., AIME, New York, pp 237–302

  • Edelbro C, Sjöberg J, Nordlund E (2007) A quantitative comparison of strength criteria for hard rock masses. Tunnel Under Space Tech 22(1):57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK (1994) Correlations for predicting support pressures and closures in tunnels. Ph.D. Thesis, Nagpur University, Nagpur, India, 154

  • Goel RK, Jethwa JL, Paithakar AG (1996) Correlation between Barton’s Q and Bieniawski’s RMR: a new approach. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 33(2):179–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokçeoglu C, Sonmez H, Kayabaşi A (2003) Predicting the deformation moduli of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:701–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimstaad E, Barton N (1993) Updating the Q-system for NMT, Int. Sym. Sprayed Concrete, Fagernes, Norway, Norwegian Concrete Association, Oslo, Norway, pp 20–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi M, Ajalloeian R, Moghaddas Sh (2004a) Rock Mass stability analysis for underground excavation support system, the Sabzkuh water conveyance Tunnel, Iran, In: Ahmadi M (ed) 2nd edn. Iranain Rock Mechanics Conf. (IRMC2004), Tehran, IRAN

  • Hashemi M, Ajalloeian R, Moghaddas Sh (2004b) Rock mass characterization for underground excavation support system, the Sabzkuh water conveyance tunnel, Iran. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(3):532–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E (1994) Strength of rock and rock masses. News J ISRM 2(2):4–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8):1165–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Diederichs MS (2006) Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Vol 43:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Kaiser PK, Bawden WF (1995) Support of underground excavation in hard rock, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 215

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Marinos PG, Benissi M (1998) Applicability of the geological strength index (GSI) classification for weak and sheared rock masses—the case of the Athens schist formation. Bull Eng Geol Env 57(2):151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carranza-Torres CT, Corkum B (2002) Hoek-Brown failure criterion-2002 edition, In: Bawden HRW, Curran J, Telsenicki M (eds) Proceedings of the fifth North American rock mechanics Society (NARMS-TAC 2002) symposium, Mining Innovation and Technology, Toronto, Canada, pp 267–273

  • Hoek E, Marinos PG, Marinos VP (2005) Characterization and engineering properties of tectonically undisturbed but lithologically varied sedimentary rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42(2):277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser TK, Gale AD (1985) Evaluation of Cost and Emprical Support Design at B.C. Rail Tumbler Ridge Tunnels. Canadian Tunnelling, Tunnelling Association of Canada, Wiley, New York, pp 77–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalamaras GS, Bieniawski ZT (1993) A rock mass strength concept for coal seams, In: Peng SS (ed) 12th Conf. Ground Control in Mining, Morgantown, pp 274–283

  • Kayabaşi A, Gokçeoglu C, Ercanoglu M (2003) Estimating the deformation modulus of rock masses: a comparative study. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Samadhiya NK, Anbalagan R (2004) Application of rock mass classification system for tunneling in Himalaya, India Paper 3B 14, SINOROCK2004 Symposium. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(3):531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer H (1958) Classification for tunnel construction (in German). Geologie und Bauwesen 24(1):46–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinos P, Hoek E (2000) GSI: a geologically friendly tool for rock mass strength estimation. In: Proceeding of the GeoEng 2000. The international conference on geotechnical and geological engineering, Melbourne, Technomic publishers, Lancaster, pp 1422–1446

  • Marinos P, Hoek E (2001) Estimating the geotechnical properties of heterogeneous rock masses such as flysch. Bull Eng Geol Env 60:82–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Marinos P, Hoek E (2005) The geological strength index—applications and limitations. Bull Eng Geol Environ 64:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitri HS, Edrissi R, Henning J (1994) Finite element modelling of cable-bolted stopes in hardrock groundmines. In: SME Annual Meeting. Albuquerque. New Mexico, pp 94–116

  • Moghaddas Sh (2004) Evaluation of engineering geology characteristics of rock mass along the Sabzkuh water conveyance tunnel, M.Sc. thesis, Engineering Geology group, Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, The University of Isfahan (UI), Isfahan, IRAN, p 124

  • Moreno TE (1980) Application de las c1assificaciones geomechnicas a los tuneles de parjares. 11 Cursode Sostenimientos Activosen Galeriasy Tunnels. Foundation Gomez Parto, Madrid

  • Nicholson GA, Bieniawski ZT (1990) A nonlinear deformation modulus based on rock mass classification. Int J Min Geol Eng 8:181–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmström A (1982) The volumetric joint count—a useful and simple measure of the degree of jointing, In: Proc. IV Inter. Congress of IAEG, New Delhi, 1982, pp 221–228

  • Palmström A (1995) RMi: a rock mass classification system for rock engineering purposes. Ph. D. Thesis. The University of Oslo, 400

  • Palmström A (2000) Recent development in rock support estimates by the RMi. J Rock Mech Tunn Tech 6(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmström A, Singh R (2001) The deformation modulus of rock masses- comparisons between in situ tests and indirect estimates tunnelling. Underground Space Tech 16:115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthy T (2001) Shear strength response of some geological materials in triaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:683–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthy T (2004) A geo-engineering classification for rocks and rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge JC, Preston RL (1978) Experience with engineering classifications of rock. In: Proc. Int. Tunnelling Symp. Tokyo, A3.l–A3.7

  • Serafim JL, Pereira JP (1983) Considerations of the geomechanics classification of Bieniawski. In: Proc. of Int. Symp. Eng. Geol. Underground Construction., LNEC. Lisbon. 1, II. 33–II. 42

  • Sheory PR (1997) Empirical rock failure criterion. Oxford IBH Publishing co. and A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, p 176

  • Singh B (1993) Workshop on Norvegian method of tunneling. CSMRS, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S (1997) Time-dependent deformation modulus of rocks in tunnels. M. E. Thesis, Civil Engineering Department, University of Roorkee, India, p 180

  • Singh B, Viladkar MN, Samadhiya NK, Mehrotra VK (1997) Rock mass strength parameters mobalized in tunnels. Tunn Under Tech 12(1):47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez H, Ulusay R (1999) Modifcations to the geological strength index (GSI) and their applicability to stability of slopes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:743–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez H, Ulusay R (2002) A discussion on the Hoek–Brown failure criterion and suggested modification to the criterion verified by slope stability case studies, Yerbilmleri. Earth Sci 26:77–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez H, Gokçeoglu C, Ulusay R (2004) Indirect determination of the modulus of deformation of rock masses based on the GSI system. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(5):849–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1946) Rock defects and loads on tunnel support. In: Proctor RV, White T (eds) Rock tunnelling with steel supports. Commercial Shearing co., Youngstown, pp 15–99

  • Tuğrul A (1998) The application of rock mass classification systems to underground excavation in weak limestone, Ataturk dam. Turkey Eng Geol 50:337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verman M (1993) Rock mass—tunnel support interaction analysis, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, India, p 267

  • Verman M, Singh B, Viladkar MN, Jeyhwa JL (1997) Effect of tunnel depth on modulus of deformation of rock mass. Rock Mech Rock Eng 30(3):121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham GE, Tiedman HR, Skinner EH (1972) Support determination based on geologic predictions, In: Proc. Rapid Exc. Tunneling Conf., AIME, New York, pp 43–64

  • Yudbir F, Lemanza W, Prinzel F (1983) An empirical failure criterion for rock masses. In: Proc. 5th Int. Cong. ISRM, Melbourne, vol 1. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 131–138

  • Zhang L, Einstein HH (2004) Using RQD to estimate the deformation modulus of rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(2):337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are expressed to the Mahab-Ghods Consulting Engineers Company, especially R. Banihashemi and A. Ahangaran for providing a site visit. We also thank professor Hoek, professor Palmström and professor Gokçeoglu for providing useful points while writing this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud Hashemi.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1199-x.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hashemi, M., Moghaddas, S. & Ajalloeian, R. Application of Rock Mass Characterization for Determining the Mechanical Properties of Rock Mass: a Comparative Study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43, 305–320 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0048-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0048-y

Keywords

Navigation