Summary
Size distributions of fragments of crushed rock in conveyor belts and of blasted rock in a muckpile obtained by sieving are compared with the size distributions obtained by digital image analysis of photographs of the same materials taken on-site. Several calculation methods are tested, based on the raw distribution of fragment areas and on the volume-transformed ones. The influence of the calibration of the system on the results and the performance of the system in a non-calibrated mode are evaluated. The capacity of some distributions (Rosin-Rammler, Swebrec and lognormal) to fit the data in the coarse region (where particles can be delineated, i.e. discriminated individually) and to extrapolate to the non-delineated fines (where particles cannot be outlined and their contour delineated) is assessed. The error between the sizes measured and the sizes of the reference distributions (determined by sieving) increases from the coarse to the fines region. The maximum error at a given size depends primarily on its value relative to the fines cut-off (FCO) of the image analysis. In general, at sizes greater than the FCO, where the system is able to delineate fragments reliably, both volume and surface-based, calibrated, calculations can determine the sizes with maximum error expectancy of about 30%. Below the FCO, only the calibrated, volume calculation maintains a maximum error of 30%, down to sizes of about one fourth the FCO, rapidly increasing for smaller sizes. Where the calibration is done based on data above the FCO, errors can be large below this point, in excess of 80% at sizes half the FCO. In the fines range (sizes smaller than 0.2 times the FCO) the maximum errors can be close to or greater than 100% for most of the calculations and function fittings. Of the distributions tested, all of them are acceptable at sizes above the FCO; below that, the Swebrec function seems to adapt better towards the fines than the Rosin-Rammler and lognormal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
FC Bond (1952) ArticleTitleThe third theory of comminution Min Eng 4 484–494
SH Chung PD Katsabanis (2000) ArticleTitleFragmentation prediction using improved engineering formulae Int J Blast Fragment 4 IssueID3–4 198–207
Chung SH, Noy MJ (1996) Experience in fragmentation control. In: Franklin J, Katsabanis PD (eds) Measurement of blast fragmentation. Proc. 5th Fragblast Workshop on Measurement of Blast Fragmentation, Montreal, 23–24 August. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 247–252
Cunningham CVB (1983) The Kuz-Ram model for prediction of fragmentation from blasting. In: Proc. 1st Int. Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Luleå, Sweden, 22–26 August. Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, pp 439–452
Cunningham CVB (1987) Fragmentation estimations and the Kuz-Ram model – four years on. In: Proc. 2nd Int. Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Keystone, Colorado, USA. Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT, pp 475–487
Cunningham CVB (1996) Keynote address: optical fragmentation assessment – a technical challenge. In: Franklin J, Katsabanis PD (eds) Measurement of blast fragmentation. Proc. 5th Fragblast Workshop on Measurement of Blast Fragmentation, Montreal, 23–24 August. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 13–19
Girdner KK, Kemeny JM, Srikant A, McGill R (1996) The split system for analyzing the size distribution of fragmented rock. In: Franklin J, Katsabanis PD (eds) Measurement of blast fragmentation. Proc. 5th Fragblast Workshop on Measurement of Blast Fragmentation, Montreal, 23–24 August. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 101–108
Kemeny J, Girdner K, Bobo T, Norton B (1999) Improvements for fragmentation measurement by digital imaging: accurate estimation of fines. Proc. 6th Int. Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Johannesburg, 8–12 August. The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg, pp 103–109
Kou S, Rustan A (1993) Computerized design and result prediction of bench blasting. In: Rossmanith HP (ed) Proc. 4th Int. Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Vienna, 5–8 July. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 263–271
JP Latham J Kemeny N Maerz M Noy J Schleifer S Tose (2003) ArticleTitleA blind comparison between results of four image analysis systems using a photo-library of piles of sieved fragments Int J Blast Fragment 7 IssueID2 105–132
Maerz NH (1996) Reconstructing 3-D block size distribution from 2-D measurements on sections. In: Franklin J, Katsabanis PD (eds) Measurement of blast fragmentation. Proc. 5th Fragblast Workshop on Measurement of Blast Fragmentation, Montreal, 23–24 August. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 39–43
N Maerz W Zhou (2000) ArticleTitleCalibration of optical digital fragmentation measuring systems Int J Blast Fragment 4 IssueID2 126–138
Moser P (2003) Less fines production in aggregate and industrial minerals industry. In: Holmberg R (ed) Proc. 2nd World Conference on Explosives and Blasting, Prague, 10–12 September. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 335–343
Ouchterlony F (2003a) Influence of blasting on the size distribution and properties of muckpile fragments, a state-of-the art review. MinFo Project P2000-10: energy optimisation in comminution. Luleå University of Technology, Swebrec, pp 81–95
Ouchterlony F (2003b) Bend it like Beckham or a wide-range yet simple fragment size distribution for blasted and crushed rock. Technical report No. 78, EU Project contract G1RD-CT-2000-00438. Swebrec, Stockholm
F Ouchterlony (2005a) ArticleTitleThe Swebrec© function: linking fragmentation by blasting and crushing Inst Min Metall A 114 A29–A44
Ouchterlony F (2005b) What does the fragment size distribution of blasted rock look like? In: Holmberg R (ed) Proc. 3rd World Conference on Explosives and Blasting, Brighton, 13–16 September. European Federation of Explosives Engineers, Reading, UK, pp 189–199
Ouchterlony F, Niklasson B, Abrahamsson S (1990) Fragmentation monitoring of production blasts at MRICA. In: Proc. 3rd International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Brisbane, Australia, pp 283–289
Ouchterlony F, Nyberg U, Olsson M, Bergqvist I, Granlund L, Grind H (2003) The energy balance of production blasts at Nordkalk’s Klinthagen quarry. Proc. 2nd World Conference on Explosives and Blasting, Prague, 10–12 September. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 193–203
Ouchterlony F, Nyberg U, Olsson M, Bergqvist I, Granlund L, Kontturi M (2004) The WP6+7 blasts at Nordkalk’s Klinthagen quarry. Technical Report No. 93, EU Project contract G1RD-CT-2000-00438. Swebrec, Stockholm, p 21
JA Sanchidrián P Segarra LM López (2006) ArticleTitleA practical procedure for the measurement of fragmentation by blasting by image analysis Rock Mech Rock Eng 39 IssueID4 359–382 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00603-005-0073-4
Segarra P, Sanchidrián JA, Moser P, Grasedieck A, Smöch B, Pascual JA (2005) Energy-controlled blasting for less fines production. In: Holmberg R (ed) Proc. 3rd World Conference on Explosives and Blasting, Brighton, 13–16 September. European Federation of Explosives Engineers, Reading, UK, pp 535–543
Split Engineering (2001) Split-desktop software manual. Split Engineering LLC, Tucson
Tessier B, Schleifer J, Grasedieck A, Sanchidrián JA, Ouchterlony F (2002) Description and documentation of the fragmentation and blast data system installed in the quarries. Technical Report no. 12, EU Project contract G1RD-CT-2000-00438. École National Supérieure des Mines, Paris
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Correspondence: José A. Sanchidrián, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, E.T.S.I. Minas, Rios Rosas 21, 28003 Madrid, Spain
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanchidrián, J., Segarra, P., Ouchterlony, F. et al. On the accuracy of fragment size measurement by image analysis in combination with some distribution functions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42, 95–116 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-007-0161-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-007-0161-8