Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Telomerase Activity Levels for Evaluating the Surgical Margin in Breast-Conserving Surgery

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the efficiency of measuring telomerase activity levels in clinical diagnosis, we performed a semiquantitative analysis of telomerase activity in breast tumors and compared the results with the histological findings. Breast tissue adjacent to areas of cancer were also serially resected and checked for telomerase activity. The amount of telomerase activity in the breast cancers ranged widely, from 0.36 to 1 180 units/μg, with 31 of the 34 (91.2%) showing a value above 1.0 unit/μg. None of the normal breast tissues including mastopathy, and only 4 (23.5%) of 17 benign breast masses had values above 1.0 unit/μg. Telomerase activity was detectable in serial sections of adjacent tissues as far as 10 mm from the macroscopic tumor margin with histologically detectable cancer cells. Furthermore, telomerase activity was detectable in the scrape specimens obtained from the stump of the surgical margins for breast-conserving surgery, and this activity was in accordance with the histological findings. These findings show that conducting a semiquantitative assay of telomerase activity is useful for evaluating the surgical margin in breast-conserving surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: May 10, 2000 / Accepted: September 26, 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hara, Y., Iwase, H., Toyama, T. et al. Telomerase Activity Levels for Evaluating the Surgical Margin in Breast-Conserving Surgery. Surg Today 31, 289–294 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s005950170147

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s005950170147

Navigation