Skip to main content
Log in

Individualized treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia reduces adolescent recurrence rate: an analysis of 3006 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We implemented the individualized treatment (IT) regimen for children with inguinal hernia and the Lichtenstein hernioplasty using an acellular tissue matrix patch (LHAP) for those with high risks. This retrospective study compares the complications of conventional laparoscopic high hernia sac ligation (LHSL) with those of the IT regimen for the management of pediatric inguinal hernia and investigates whether the recurrence rate of inguinal hernias in children treated by IT is lower than that of those treated by LHSL.

Methods

The subjects of this retrospective study were 3006 children who underwent LHSL or IT for inguinal hernia between February, 2008 and February, 2016 at the Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital (Beijing, China). They comprised 1516 (50.4%) children who underwent LHSL between February, 2008 and December, 2012, and 1490 (49.6%) who underwent IT between January, 2013 and June, 2016. We analyzed the patients' data, including clinical characteristics and postoperative complications. The mean follow-up was 85.31 months for the LHSL group and 43.34 months for the IT group (P < 0.01). Given the difference in the follow-up periods, the log-rank test was used to analyze the recurrence rate.

Results

The mean age, weight, and height of these children at the time of surgery were 6 years old, 24.17 kg, and 114.48 cm in the LHSL group and 6 years old, 24.57 kg, and 115.18 cm in the IT group, respectively (P = 0.647, P = 0.393, P = 0.505). The mean age, body weight, and height for adolescents at the time of surgery were 14.7 years old, 57.19 kg, and 168.37 cm in the LHSL group and 14.9 years old, 57.96 kg and 169.21 cm in the IT group, respectively (P = 0.099, P = 0.061, P = 0.059). The male/female ratio was 5.1:1 (1268/248) in the LHSL group and 4.9:1 (1241/249) in the IT group (P = 0.795). The side ratio of inguinal hernia (right/left/bilateral) was about 10:7:8 (602/430/484) in the LHSL group and 3.8:2.8:3.4 (567/422/501) in the IT group (P = 0.551). The comorbidities of the male patients included hydrocele (206), cryptorchidism (15), umbilical hernia (12), congenital heart disease (16), and other congenital diseases (25). The comorbidities in the female patients included round ligament cysts (11). There was no significant difference between the groups in postoperative complications including hydrocele (P = 0.687), hematoma (P = 0.061), surgical site infection (P = 0.742), testicular atrophy (not found), and umbilical trocar hernia (P = 0.585). There were two cases of recurrence in the IT group and eight in the LHSL group (P = 0.07). The frequency of postoperative recurrence of adolescent inguinal hernia was 3.16% (7/221) in the LHSL group, 0 (0/223) in the IT group (P = 0.008), and 0 (0/128) in the LHSL subgroup in the IT group (P = 0.045).

Conclusion

The favorable outcomes of IT, which had a lower recurrence rate than LHSL for adolescent inguinal hernia, demonstrate that this is a reasonable treatment regimen for pediatric inguinal hernia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raveenthiran V, Agarwal P. Choice of repairing inguinal hernia in children: open vs laparoscopy. Indian J Pediatr. 2017;84:555–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abd-Alrazek M, Alsherbiny H, Mahfouz M, Alsamahy O, Shalaby R, Shams A, et al. Laparoscopic pediatric inguinal hernia repair: a controlled randomized study. Pediatr Surg. 2017;52:1539–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amano H, Tanaka Y, Kawashima H, Deie K, Fujiogi M, Suzuki K, et al. Comparison of single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SILPEC) and open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia: a single-center retrospective cohort study of 2028 cases. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:4988–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan IH, Tam PK. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in infants and children: state-of-the-art technique. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2017;27:465–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shalaby R, Elsayaad I, Alsamahy O, Ibrahem R, El-Saied A, Ismail M, et al. One trocar needlescopic assisted inguinal hernia repair in children: a novel technique. J Pediatr Surg. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang Z, Zeng H, Yin J, Li J, Zhou G, Zhao W, et al. The advantages of transumbilical single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernia in 1583 children. Surg Endosc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5885-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Galván Montaño A, Ouddane Robles PMA, García Moreno S. Sutureless inguinal hernia repair with creation of a peritoneal lesion in children: a novel laparoscopic technique with a low recurrence rate. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:638–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ordorica-Flores R, Figueroa-Portillo R, Pérez-Escamirosa F, Lorias-Espinoza D, Minor-Martínez A, Olivares-Clavijo H, et al. Pediatric inguinal hernia repair with a single-incision approach using an Endo Close™ suturing device. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:5134–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zendejas B, Zarroug AE, Erben YM, Holley CT, Farley DR. Impact of childhood inguinal hernia repair in adulthood: 50 years of follow-up. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:762–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen J, Chu CB, Shen YM, Zou ZY, Yuan X. Individualized treatment of inguinal hernia in children. In: Fethi D, editor. Hernia. Rijeka: InTech; 2017. p. 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chang SJ, Chen JY, Hsu CK, Chuang FC, Yang SS. The incidence of inguinal hernia and associated risk factors of incarceration in pediatric inguinal hernia: a nation-wide longitudinal population-based study. Hernia. 2016;20:559–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1450-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Montupet P, Esposito C. Fifteen years experience in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in pediatric patients. Results and considerations on a debated procedure. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:450–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiang B, Jin S, Zhong L, Li F, Jiang X, Xu Z. Reasons for recurrence after the laparoscopic repair of indirect inguinal hernia in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25:681–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Esposito C, Escolino M, Cortese G, Aprea G, Turrà F, Farina A, et al. Twenty-year experience with laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in infants and children: considerations and results on 1833 hernia repairs. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:1461–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Parelkar SV, Oak S, Gupta R, Sanghvi B, Shimoga PH, Kaltari D, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the pediatric age group-experience with 437 children. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:789–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Treef W, Schier F. Characteristics of laparoscopic inguinal hernia recurrences. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;25:149–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Giseke S, Glass M, Tapadar P, Matthyssens L, Philippe P. A true laparoscopic herniotomy in children: evaluation of long-term outcome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20:191–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shehata SM, ElBatarny AM, Attia MA, El Attar AA, Shalaby AM. Laparoscopic interrupted muscular arch repair in recurrent unilateral inguinal hernia among children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25:675–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ein SH, Njere I, Ein A. Six thousand three hundred sixty-one pediatric inguinal hernias: a 35-year review. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:980–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bruzoni M, Jaramillo JD, Kastenberg ZJ, Wall JK, Wright R, Dutta S. Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic transcutaneous inguinal herniorraphy with high transfixation suture ligature of the hernia sac. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50:1767–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shalaby R, Abd Alrazek M, Elsaied A, Helal A, Mahfouz M, Ismail M, et al. Fifteen years experience with laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in infants and children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28:101–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Erdoğan D, Karaman I, Aslan MK, Karaman A, Cavuşoğlu YH. Analysis of 3776 pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele cases in a tertiary center. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:1767–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Esposito C, Montinaro L, Alicchio F. Technical standardization of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in pediatric patients. World J Surg. 2009;33:1846–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gasior AC, Knott EM, Kanters A, St Peter SD, Ponsky TA. Two-center analysis of long-term outcomes after high ligation inguinal hernia repair in adolescents. Am Surg. 2015;81:1260–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

We have no potential conflicts of interest to declare with respect to the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethical Board Review of our hospital and performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chu, C.B., Chen, J., Shen, Y.M. et al. Individualized treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia reduces adolescent recurrence rate: an analysis of 3006 cases. Surg Today 50, 499–508 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01940-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01940-4

Keywords

Navigation