Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility of single-incision thoracoscopic surgery using a modified chest wall pulley for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a propensity score matching analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Recently, single-incision thoracoscopic surgery (SITS) has been recognized as a favorable treatment choice for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) compared with conventional three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, conventional SITS bullectomy often results in collisions with surgical devices. Therefore, we devised a method of SITS using a chest wall pulley for lung excision (PulLE) and modified PulLE (mPulLE) system, which substitutes threads to eliminate such collisions. We compared the mPulLE system with conventional procedures using propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for patient backgrounds.

Methods

Using PSM, we evaluated the surgical results of 210 PSP patients who underwent VATS, including mPulLE (n = 23) and three-port VATS (n = 102), at our institution between January 2010 and August 2016.

Results

We selected 17 mPulLE cases and 17 three-port VATS. There were no marked differences between the groups in the patient backgrounds or surgical results. However, there was a significant difference between the mPulLE cases and the three-port VATS cases in the operative time (71.7 ± 15.7 vs. 85.9 ± 25.5 min, respectively, P = 0.0388) and the number of autosutures used (3.6 ± 1.2 vs. 4.5 ± 1.2, respectively, P = 0.0178).

Conclusion

The surgical results of mPulLE in patients with PSP with multiple lesions were equivalent to those achieved with three-port VATS under the same conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamamoto H, Okada M, Takada M, Matsuoka H, Sakata K, Kawamura M. Video-assisted thoracic surgery through a single skin incision. Arch Surg. 1998;133:145–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E. Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;77:726–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiume F, Refai M, Sciarra V, Soccetti A, et al. Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: clinical and economic analysis in comparison to the traditional approach. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008;7:63–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Son BS, Kim do H, Lee SK, Kim CW. Small single-incision thoracoscopic surgery using an anchoring suture in patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a safe and feasible procedure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:1224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berlanga LA, Gigirey O. Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax using a single incision laparoscopic surgery port: a feasible and safe procedure. Surg Endosc. 2010;25:2044–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Igai H, Kamiyoshihara M, Ibe T, Kawatani N, Shimizu K. Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax using multi-degrees of freedom forceps. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;20:974–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsuboshima K, Wakahara T, Matoba Y, Miyauchi H, Hayashi C, Kobayashi I, et al. Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery using chest wall pulley for lung excision in primary spontaneous pneumothorax cases. Surg Today. 2015;45:595–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsuboshima K, Nagata M, Wakahara T, Matoba Y, Maniwa Y. Modified chest wall pulley for lung excision during single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;22(6):359–62. doi:10.5761/atcs.nm.16-00125.

  9. Jutley RS, Khalil MW, Rocco G. Uniportal vs standard three-port VATS technique for spontaneous pneumothorax: comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28:43–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang HC, Cho S, Jheon S. Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax using the SILS port compared with conventional three-port surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:139–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Song IH, Lee SY, Lee SJ. Can single-incision thoracoscopic surgery using a wound protector be used as a first-line approach for the surgical treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax? A comparison with three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:284–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, Ito H, Kanemitsu Y, Masuda N, et al. Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016;46:668–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen PR, Chen CK, Lin YS, Huang HC, Tsai JS, Chen CY, et al. Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;6:58. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-6-58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yano M, Yamada T, Uchida T, Moriyama S, Haneda H, Okuda K, et al. The advantages of selecting cartridges with a 1.8 mm height for pulmonary stapling. Surg Today. 2016;46:1176–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Tsuboshima.

Ethics declarations

Funding

None declared.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsuboshima, K., Nagata, M., Wakahara, T. et al. Feasibility of single-incision thoracoscopic surgery using a modified chest wall pulley for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a propensity score matching analysis. Surg Today 47, 1129–1134 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1483-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1483-0

Keywords

Navigation