Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A case-matched comparison of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To minimize the parietal trauma associated with multiple surgical access sites, single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colectomy has been emerging with the improvements in instrumentation and surgical techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinicopathological outcomes between single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy (SILC) and multiport laparoscopic right colectomy (MLC) for right colon cancer.

Methods

Thirty-five consecutive patients undergoing SILC from a prospective single-institution database were case matched according to demographic data to an equivalent number of patients who underwent MLC.

Results

The SILC patients had decreased scores for maximal pain assessed by a visual analog scale on postoperative days 1 and 3, and used fewer postoperative systemic narcotics. The median length of the hospital stay for the SILC patients was significantly shorter compared with the MLC patients. The postoperative morbidity rates were similar between the groups. The oncological findings were not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusion

SILC is a feasible and safe alternative to conventional MLC for patients with right colon cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1187–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, Prins HA, Arroyo V, Ibarzabal A, et al. The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg. 2008;248:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:1013–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP. Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:823–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Merchant AM, Lin E. Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for a colon mass. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1021–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi SI, Lee KY, Park SJ, Lee SH. Single port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with D3 dissection for advanced colon cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:275–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Keshava A, Young CJ, Mackenzie S. Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1881–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boni L, Dionigi G, Cassinotti E, Giuseppe MD, Diurni M, Rausei S, et al. Single incision laparoscopic right colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3233–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramos-Valadez DI, Patel CB, Ragupathi M, Pickron TB, Haas EM. Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: safety and feasibility in a series of consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2613–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Haas EM. Single incision laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy: technique and application (with video). Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20:e146–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rieger NA, Lam FF. Single-incision laparoscopically assisted colectomy using standard laparoscopic instrumentation. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:888–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ross H, Steele S, Whiteford M, Lee S, Albert M, Mutch M, et al. Early multi-institution experience with single-incision laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:187–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Katsuno G, Fukunaga M, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Ouchi M, Hirasaki Y. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: early experience with 31 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:705–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirano Y, Hattori M, Sato Y, Maeda K, Douden K, Hashizume Y. The outcome of single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy for colon carcinoma in the elderly. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:338–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Takayama S, Nakai N, Sakamoto M, Takeyama H. Single-incision laparoscopic herniorrhaphy for inguinal hernia repair. Surg Today. 2014;44:513–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hiro J, Inoue Y, Okugawa Y, Kawamoto A, Okita Y, Toiyama Y, et al. Single-port laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Surg Today. 2014;44:586–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sasaki A, Nitta H, Otsuka K, Fujiwara H, Takahara T, Wakabayashi G. Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a case-matched comparison. Surg Today. 2014;44:1282–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Adair J, Gromski MA, Lim RB, Nagle D. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1549–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Waters JA, Guzman MJ, Fajardo AD, Selzer DJ, Wiebke EA, Robb BW, et al. Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1467–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen WTL, Chang SC, Chiang HC, Lo WY, Jeng LB, Wu C, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term results. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1887–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Papaconstantinou HT, Sharp N, Thomas JS. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:72–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gandhi DP, Ragupathi M, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Pickron TB, Haas EM. Single-incision versus hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched series. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1875–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Champagne BJ, Lee EC, Leblanc F, Stein SL, Delaney CP. Single-incision vs straight laparoscopic segmental colectomy: a case-controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:183–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee SW, Milson JW, Nash GM. Single-incision versus multiple laparoscopic right and hand-assisted left colectomy: a case-matched comparison. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:1355–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

On Suzuki and co-authors have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to On Suzuki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suzuki, O., Nakamura, F., Kashimura, N. et al. A case-matched comparison of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer. Surg Today 46, 297–302 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1154-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1154-y

Keywords

Navigation