Abstract
Catheter rupture after totally implantable access port (TIAP) implantation via the right internal jugular vein is thought to be very rare. We report a case of catheter rupture found 682 days after TIAP surgery in a 52-year-old woman with recurrent right breast cancer. It is possible that chronic stress at the flexure of the catheter induced by neck movements caused the catheter to rupture. Therefore, when inserting a TIAP via the right internal jugular vein, the site of venous puncture should be decided on carefully. Although a fracture of this type is rarely reported in the literature, the incidence of catheter injury of a TIAP inserted via the internal jugular vein at our institute is 1.8 %. This highlights the need to educate and caution medical staff and patients about preventing catheter fracture being caused by external factors.
References
Kurul S, Saip P, Aydin T. Totally implantable venous-access ports: local problems and extravasation injury. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3:684–92.
Sawayama H, Hayashi N, Watanabe M, Takamori H, Beppu T, Baba H. The central vein access port and catheter in outpatient chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a retrospective study of 101 patients. Surg Today. 2012;42:29–34.
Surov A, Wienke A, Carter JM, Stoevesandt D, Behrmann C, Spielmann RP, et al. Intravascular embolization of venous catheter–causes, clinical signs, and management: a systematic review. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33:677–85.
Charvat J, Linke Z, Horaekova M, Prausova J. Implantation of central venous ports with catheter insertion via the right internal jugular vein in oncology patients: single center experience. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14:1162–5.
Yip D, Funaki B. Subcutaneous chest ports via the internal jugular vein. A retrospective study of 117 oncology patients. Acta Radiol. 2002;43:371–5.
Osawa H, Hasegawa J, Yamakawa K, Matsunami N, Mikata S, Shimizu J, et al. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular axillary vein puncture is effective to avoid pinch-off syndrome: a long-term follow-up study. Surg Today. 2012 Aug 28. [Epub ahead of print].
Wu CY, Fu JY, Feng PH, Kao TC, Yu SY, Li HJ, et al. Catheter fracture of intravenous ports and its management. World J Surg. 2011;35:2403–10.
Park HS, Kim YI, Lee SH, Kim JI, Seo H, Lee SM, et al. Central venous infusion port inserted via high versus low jugular venous approaches: retrospective comparison of outcome and complications. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:494–8.
Shinoura N, Yamada R, Tabei Y, Saitoh K. The consideration in the catheter rupture of venous port (in Japanese). Rad Fan 2008;6:2.
Shimizu T, Mekata E, Murata S, Yamamoto T, Tani T. A case of catheter fracture of a totally implantable access port introduced through the right internal jugular vein. J Surg Oncol. 2011;103:460–1.
Sartori S, Trevisani L, Nielsen I, Tassinari D, Ceccotti P, Abbasciano V. Longevity of silicone and polyurethane catheters in long-term enteral feeding via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:853–6.
Vandoni RE, Guerra A, Sanna P, Bogen M, Cavalli F, Gertsch P. Randomised comparison of complications from three different permanent central venous access systems. Swiss Med Wkly. 2009;139:313–6.
Ananthakrishnan G, McDonald R, Moss J, Kasthuri R. Central venous access port devices—a pictorial review of common complications from the interventional radiology perspective. J Vasc Access. 2012;13:9–15.
Biffi R, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Pace U, Bonomo G, Monfardini L, et al. Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:935–40.
Conflict of interest
Yoshinobu Nagasawa and his co-authors have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Y. Nagasawa and T. Shimizu contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nagasawa, Y., Shimizu, T., Sonoda, H. et al. Is catheter rupture rare after totally implantable access port implantation via the right internal jugular vein? Report of a case. Surg Today 44, 1346–1349 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0631-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0631-4