Skip to main content
Log in

Reduced perioperative immune response in video-assisted versus open surgery in a rat model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To establish the best technique for thoracoscopic pneumonectomy in the rat and to analyze the differences in perioperative immune response between open and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in a rat model.

Methods

The four experimental groups studied were as follows: VATS pneumonectomy, open pneumonectomy, thoracoscopic observation, and open observation. We measured the immunocyte counts and serum cytokine levels postoperatively in each group.

Results

The CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ lymphocyte counts were decreased significantly 12–24 h postoperatively in all groups. Immunosuppression peaked later in the open approach groups than in the VATS groups. The interleukin-6 level was significantly higher in the open approach groups than in the VATS groups.

Conclusions

From the viewpoint of immunity, in this rat model VATS was less invasive than open surgery, and open surgery caused greater immunosuppression than VATS, irrespective of organ resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gharagozloo F, Tempesta B, Margolis M, Alexander EP. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1009–1015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walker WS, Codispoti M, Soon SY, Stamenkovic S, Carnochan F, Pugh G. Long-term outcomes following VATS lobectomy for non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:397–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas P, Doddoli C, Yena S, Thirion X, Sebag F, Fuentes P, et al. VATS is an adequate oncological operation for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:1094–1099.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shichinohe T, Hirano S, Kondo S. Video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today 2008;38:206–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tashiro T, Yamamori H, Takagi K, Hayashi N, Furukawa K, Nitta H, et al. Changes in immune function following surgery for esophageal carcinoma. Nutrition 1999;15:760–766.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ogawa K, Hirai M, Katsube T, Murayama M, Hamaguchi K, Shimakawa T, et al. Suppression of cellular immunity by surgical stress. Surgery 2000;127:329–336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leaver HA, Craig SR, Yap PL, Walker WS. Lymphocyte responses following open and minimally invasive thoracic surgery. Eur J Clin Invest 2000;30:230–238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagahiro I, Andou A, Aoe M, Sano Y, Date H, Shimizu N. Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:362–365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Inada K, Shirakusa T, Yoshinaga Y, Yoneda S, Shiraishi T, Okabayashi K, et al. The role of video-assisted thoracic surgery for the treatment of lung cancer: lung lobectomy by thoracoscopy versus the standard thoracotomy approach. Int Surg 2000;85:6–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Craig SR, Leaver HA, Yap PL, Pugh GC, Walker WS. Acute phase responses following minimal access and conventional thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:455–463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yim AP, Wan S, Lee TW, Arifi AA. VATS lobectomy reduces cytokine responses compared with conventional surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:243–247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugi K, Kaneda Y, Esato K. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy reduces cytokine production more than conventional open lobectomy. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;48:161–165.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kishimoto T. The biology of interleukin-6. Blood 1989;74:1–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Damas P, Ledoux D, Nys M, Vrindts Y, De Groote D, Franchimont P, et al. Cytokine serum level during severe sepsis in human IL-6 as a marker of severity. Ann Surg 1992;215:356–361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roth JA, Golub SH, Grimm EA, Eilber FR, Morton DL. Effect of operation on immune response in cancer patients: sequential evaluation of in vitro lymphocyte function. Surgery 1976;79:46–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yuen PM, Mak TW, Yim SF, Ngan Kee WD, Lam CW, Rogers MS, et al. Metabolic and inflammatory response after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Walker WS, Pugh GC, Craig SR, Carnochan FM. Continued experience with thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection. Int Surg 1996;81:255–258.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker WS, Leaver HA, Immunologic and stress responses following video-assisted thoracic surgery and open pulmonary lobectomy in early stage lung cancer. Thorac Surg Clin 2007;17:241–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ito, Y., Oda, M., Tsunezuka, Y. et al. Reduced perioperative immune response in video-assisted versus open surgery in a rat model. Surg Today 39, 682–688 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-3935-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-3935-z

Key words

Navigation