Abstract
Purpose
Small-bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is rare. No standard chemotherapy for this type of cancer has yet been established. At Cancer Institute Hospital (CIH), the chemotherapy regimen used for colorectal cancer is initially used for patients with SBA, followed by that used for gastric cancer.
Methods
Patients with advanced or recurrent SBA who had been treated with chemotherapy in CIH were retrospectively analyzed. The first-line treatments were fluoropyrimidines used alone or in combination with other drugs, such as 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FL), UFT-E, or TS-1. The second-line treatment was irinotecan (CPT-11) monotherapy.
Results
Fluoropyrimidine-based regimens, mainly FL, were used for 10 patients. Seven patients received the second-line CPT-11 regimen. Disease control was seen in five patients (50%) with the first-line chemotherapy and in three (43%) with the second-line. The median overall survival time was 12 months (range 3–39). The treatments were generally tolerated. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common adverse effects.
Conclusions
Fluoropyrimidines as the first-line and CPT-11 as the second-line chemotherapy yielded low response, although the adverse effects were mild. The FOLFOX and FOLFIRI regimens such as those used for metastatic colorectal cancer are potential alternative strategies. Extensive trials are needed to develop standard chemotherapy with new drugs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sager GF. Primary malignant tumors of the small intestine. A twenty-two year experience with thirty patients. Am J Surg 1978;135(4):601–603.
Ciccarelli O, Welch JP, Kent GG. Primary malignant tumors of the small bowel. The Hartford Hospital experience, 1969–1983. Am J Surg 1987;153(4):350–354.
Martin RG. Malignant tumors of the small intestine. Surg Clin North Am 1986;66(4):779–785.
Trotti A, Byhardt R, Stetz J, Gwede C, Corn B, Fu K, et al. Common toxicity criteria: version 2.0. an improved reference for grading the acute effects of cancer treatment: impact on radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;47(1):13–47.
Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–481.
Ashley SW, Wells SA Jr. Tumors of the small intestine. Semin Oncol 1988;15(2):116–128.
Mittal VK, Bodzin JH. Primary malignant tumors of the small bowel. Am J Surg 1980;140(3):396–399.
Zollimger RM Jr. Primary neoplasm of the small intestine. Am J Surg 1986;151(6):654–658.
Frost DB, Mercado PD, Tyrell JS. Small bowel cancer: a 30-year review. Ann Surg Oncol 1994;1(4):290–295.
Talamonti MS, Goetz LH, Rao S, Joehl RJ. Primary cancers of the small bowel: analysis of prognostic factors and results of surgical management. Arch Surg 2002;137(5):564–570; discussion 570–1.
Gibson MK, Holcroft CA, Kvols LK, Haller D. Phase II study of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin C for metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma. Oncologist 2005;10:132–137.
Jigyasu D, Bedikian AY, Stroehlein JR. Chemotherapy for primary adenocarcinoma of the small bowel. Cancer 1984;53(1): 23–25.
Crawley C, Ross P, Norman A, Hill A, Cunningham D. The Royal Marsden experience of a small bowel adenocarcinoma treated with protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil. Br J Cancer 1998;78(4):508–510.
Polyzos A, Kouraklis G, Giannopoulos A, Bramis J, Delladetsima JK, Sfikakis PP. Irinotecan as salvage chemotherapy for advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma: a series of three patients. J Chemother 2003;15(5):503–506.
Locher C, Malka D, Boige V, Lebray P, Elias D, Lasser P, et al. Combination chemotherapy in advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma. Oncology 2005;69(4):290–294.
Onodera H, Nishitai R, Shimizu K, Maetani S, Imamura M. Small intestinal cancer with extensive lymph node metastases showing complete remission by methotrexate/5-fluorouracil sequential therapy: report of a case. Surg Today. 1997;27(1):60–63.
Yamao T, Shimada Y, Shirao K, Ohtsu A, Ikeda N, Hyodo I, et al. Phase II study of sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy against peritoneally disseminated gastric cancer with malignant ascites: a report from the Gastrointestinal Oncology Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group, JCOG 9603 Trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2004;34(6):316–322.
Boku N, Yamamoto S, Shirao K, Doi T, Sawaki A, Koizumi W, et al. Randomized phase III study of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone versus combination of irinotecan and cisplatin (CP) versus S-1 alone in advanced gastric cancer (JCOG9912). Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(18S):LBA4513.
Narahara H, Koizumi W, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M, et al. Randomized phase III study of S-1 alone versus S-1 + cisplatin in the treatment for advanced gastric cancer (The SPIRITS trial) SPIRITS: S-1 plus cisplatin vs S-1 in RCT in the treatment for stomach cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(18S):4514.
de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, Homerin M, Hmissi A, Cassidy J, et al. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2938–2947.
Bennouna J, Monnier A, Rivière A, Milleron B, Lemarie E, Trillet-Lenoir V, et al. Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2000;355:1041–1047.
Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2335–2342.
Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, Khayat D, Bleiberg H, Santoro A, et al. Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351(4):337–345.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suenaga, M., Mizunuma, N., Chin, K. et al. Chemotherapy for small-bowel Adenocarcinoma at a single institution. Surg Today 39, 27–31 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-3843-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-3843-2