Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Current progress in neonatal surgery

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neonatal surgery is the most specialized and sophisticated field of pediatric surgery. I herein review esophageal atresia, abdominal wall defects, gastrointestinal perforation, and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) as representative types of neonatal surgery. The clinical results of esophageal atresia have been considered to reflect the level of medicine of an individual country. Owing to an early diagnosis, improved operative techniques, and better perioperative management, the mortality rate has now become almost 0%. In addition, a minimally invasive thoracotomy is considered to improve long-term quality of life. The overall mortality rate of neonatal surgical disease has markedly decreased and is now less than 10%. However, abdominal wall defects, gastrointestinal perforation, and CDH still show a high mortality rate. A high incidence of chromosomal anomalies results in a poor outcome for abdominal wall defect. A gastrointestinal perforation in an infant complicated with an extremely how birth weight shows a high mortality rate. In CDH, pulmonary hypoplasia as well as pulmonary hypertension often causes an acute respiratory and circulatory deterioration after birth. Neither intensive care for pulmonary hypertension, including ECMO, nor fetal intervention has yet achieved a satisfactory outcome. Permissive hypercapnea and a delayed operation aiming at circulatory stabilization have resulted in a good survival rate. However, CDH survivors may be at risk for long-term morbidities. The method to induce pulmonary development is considered to be mandatory to achieve a good quality of life for severe CDH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Suita S. Personal Odyssey of neonatal surgery (in Japanese). J Jpn Soc Perinat Neon Med 2005;41:627–634.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haight C, Towsley HA. Congenital atresia of the esophagus with tracheoesophageal fistula. Extrapleural ligation of fistula and end-to-end anastomosis of esophageal segment. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1943;76:672–688.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Committee on Academic Survey and Advanced Medical Science of Jpn Soci Pediatr Surg. Current status of neonatal surgery (in Japanese). Jpn J Pediatr Surg 2004;40:919–934.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spitz L, Kiely EM, Pierro A. Gastric transposition in children — a 21 year experience. J Pediatr Surg 2004;39:276–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khorshid EA, Dokhan AL, Turkistani AF, Shadi SM, Hassab MH. Five-year experience in prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of esophageal atresia in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 2003;23:132–134.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taguchi T, Suita S, Masumoto K, Shono T, Taguchi S, Uesugi T. Past, present, future in esophageal atresia. Proceedings of the 15th Fukuoka International Symposium on Perinatal Medicine; 2004. p. 65–71.

  7. Stringer MD, McKenna KM, Goldstein RB, Filly RA, Adzick. NS, Harrison. Prenatal diagnosis of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:1258–1263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Waterston DJ, Bonhem-Carter RE, Alberdeen E. Oesophageal atresia: tracheooesophageal fistula. A study of survival in 218 infants. Lancet 1962;1:819–822.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Konkin DE, O’Hali WA, Webber EM, Blair GK. Outcomes in esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1726–1729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spitz L, Kieley EM, Morecrot JA, Drake DP. Oesophageal atresia: at-risk groups for the 1990s. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:723–725.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Okada A, Usui N, Inoue M, Kawahara H, Kubota A, Imura K, et al. Esophageal atresia in Osaka: A review of 39 years’ experience. J Pediatr Surg 1997;32:1570–1574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lopez PJ, Keys C, Pierro A, Drake DP, Kiely EM, Curry JI, et al. Oesophageal atresia: improved outcome in high-risk group? J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:331–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shono T, Suita S, Arima T, Handa N, Ishii K, Hirose R, et al. Motility function of the esophagus before primary anastomosis in esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1993;28:673–676.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rothenberg SS. Thoracoscopic repair of tracheoesophageal fistula in newborns. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:869–872.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Holcomb GW III, Rothenberg SS, Bax KMA, Martinez-Ferro M, Albanese CT, Ostlie DJ, et al. Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. A multi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg 2005;242:422–430.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bianchi A, Sowande O, Alizai NK, Rampersad B. Aesthetic and lateral thoracotomies in the neonate. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:1798–1800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalman A, Verebely T. The use of axillary skin crease incision for thoracotomies of neonates and children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2002;12:226–229.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. LaQuaglia MP. Esophageal atresia and ante-thoracic skin tube esophageal conduits: squamous cell carcinoma in the conduit 44 years following surgery. J Pediatr Surg 1987;22:44–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Adzick NS. Esophageal adenocarcinoma 20 years after esophageal atresia repair. J Pediatr Surg 1989;24:741–744.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Deurloo JA, van Lanschot JJ, Drillenburg P, et al. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 38 years after primary repair of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:629–630.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pultrum BB, Bijleveld CM, de Langen ZJ, Plukker JTM. Development of an adenocarcinoma of the esophagus 22 years after primary repair of a congenital atresia. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:E1–E4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Heinrich JK, Machado IN, Vivas L, Bianchi MO, CursinoAndrade K, Sbragia L, et al. Prenatal genomic profiling of abdominal wall defects through comparative genomic hybridization: perspectives for a new diagnostic tool. Fetal Diagn Ther 2007;22:361–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen CP. Chromosomal abnormalities associated with omphalocele. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2007;46:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grati FR, Turolla L, D’ajello P, Ruggeri A, Miozzo M, Bracalente G, et al. Chromosome 11 segmental paternal isodisomy in amniocytes from two fetuses with omphalocele: new highlights on phenotype-genotype correlations in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. J Med Genet 2007;44:257–263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Torfs CP, Christianson RE, Iovannisci DM, Shae GM, Lammer EJ. Selected gene polymorphisms and their interaction with maternal smoking, as risk factors for gastroschisis. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2006;76:723–730.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen XK, Wen SW, Fleming N, Yang Q, Walker MC. Teenage pregnancy and congenital anomalies: which system is vulnerable? Hum Reprod 2007;22:1730–1735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bianchi A, Dickson A. Elective delayed reduction and no anesthesia: “minimal intervention management” for gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:1338–1340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Owen A, Marven S, Jackson L, Antao B, Roberts R, Walker J, et al. Experience of bedside preformed silo staged reduction and closure for gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:1830–1835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wada M, Kato T, Hayashi Y, Selvaggi G, Mittal N, Thompson J, et al. J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:1841–1845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ein SH, Marshall DG, Girvan D. Peritoneal drainage under local anesthesia for perforations from necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr Surg 1977;12:963–967.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Morgan LJ, Shochat SJ, Hartman GE. Peritoneal drainage as primary management of perforated NEC in the very low birth weight infant. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:310–315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Azarow KS, Ein SH, Shandling B, Wesson D, Superina R, Filler RM. Laparotomy or drain for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis: who gets what and why? Pediatr Surg Int 1997;12:137–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Blakely ML, Tyson JE, Lally KP, McDonald S, Stoll BJ, Stevenson DK, et al.; NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis or isolated intestinal perforation in extremely low birth weight infants: outcomes through 18 months adjusted age. Pediatrics 2006;117:680–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Moss RL, Dimmitt RA, Barnhart DC, Broen RL, Powell DM, Islam S, et al. Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis and perforation. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2225–2234.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ladd WE, Gross RE. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia. N Engl J Med 1940;223:917–925.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Preston IR, Klinger JR, Houtches J, Nelson D, Farber HW, Hill NS. Acute and chronic effects of sildenafil in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension. Respir Med 2005;99:1501–1510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. The Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group. Does extracorporeal membrane oxygenation improve survival in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia? J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:720–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Deprest J, Jani J, Schoubroeck DV, Cannie M, Gallot D, Dymarkowski S, et al. Current consequences of prenatal diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:423–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Harrison MR, Keller RL, Hawgood SB, Kitterman JA, Sandberg PL, Farmer DL, et al. A randomized trial of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for severe fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1916–1924.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Suita S, Taguchi T, Yamanouchi T, Masumoto K, Ogita K, Nakamura M, et al. Fetal stabilization for antenatally diagnosed diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:1652–1657.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Boloker J, Bateman DA, Wung JT, Stolar CJ. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in 120 infants treated consecutively with permissive hypercapnea/spontaneous respiration/elective repair. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:357–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Scaife ER, Johnson DG, Meyers RL, Johnson SM, Matlak ME. The split abdominal wall muscle flap — a simple, mesh-free approach to repair large diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1748–1751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Masumoto K, Nagata K, Souzaki R, Uesugi T, Takahashi Y, Taguchi T. Effectiveness of diaphragmatic repair using an abdominal muscle flap in patients with recurrent congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:2007–2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cortes RA, Keller RL, Townsend T, Harrison MR, Farmer DL, Lee H, et al. Survival of congenital diaphragmatic hernia has morbid consequences. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:36–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taguchi, T. Current progress in neonatal surgery. Surg Today 38, 379–389 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3657-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3657-7

Key words

Navigation