Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hand-Sewn Cervical Anastomosis Versus Stapled Intrathoracic Anastomosis After Esophagectomy for Middle or Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The type of anastomosis and its outcome can affect postoperative morbidity, mortality, and quality of life after esophagectomy. We compared the outcomes of cervical hand-sewn anastomosis (CHS) and intrathoracic stapled anastomosis (ITS) performed after esophagectomy and gastric reconstruction.

Methods

Thirty-two patients with middle or lower thoracic esophageal cancer were prospectively randomized to undergo CHS (n = 18) or ITS (n = 14) after esophagectomy. We compared clinical data, postoperative symptoms, and long-term survival in the two groups.

Results

The rates of anastomotic leak and stricture in the CHS and ITS groups were 16.7% versus 7.1% and 0% versus 14.2%, respectively, which do not represent significant differences. The respective rates of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were 38.8% versus 7.1% (P < 0.05), and proximal esophageal resection was 15 mm longer (P < 0.05) in the CHS group. There were no significant differences in symptoms 6 months after surgery, or in the overall 5-year survival rates (72.2% and 85.7%, respectively).

Conclusions

The two methods of anastomosis yielded similar anastomotic outcomes. Although the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury was higher after CHS, and proximal esophageal resection was longer, this had little impact on postoperative symptoms and long-term survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N Ando S Ozawa Y Kitagawa Y Shinozawa M Kitajima (2000) ArticleTitleImprovement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years Ann Surg 232 225–32 Occurrence Handle10903602 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200008000-00013 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvgvVGltg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S Abo M Kitamura M Hashimoto K Izumi Y Minamiya T Shikama et al. (1996) ArticleTitleAnalysis of results of surgery performed over a 20-year period on 500 patients with cancer of the thoracic esophagus Surg Today 26 77–82 Occurrence Handle8919275 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00311768 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD2sfjsFU%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. JM Blazeby JR Farndon J Donovan D Alderson (2000) ArticleTitleA prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal carcinoma Cancer 88 1781–7 Occurrence Handle10760752 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000415)88:8<1781::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-G Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3isFGrug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. P Viklund M Lindblad J Lagergren (2005) ArticleTitleInfluence of surgery-related factors on quality of life after esophageal or cardia cancer resection World J Surg 29 841–8 Occurrence Handle15951920 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-005-7887-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. B Walther J Johansson F Johnsson CS Von Holstein T Zilling (2003) ArticleTitleCervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis Ann Surg 238 803–12 Occurrence Handle14631217 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000098624.04100.b1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. E Laterza G de' Manzoni GF Veraldi A Guglielmi P Tedesco C Cordiano (1999) ArticleTitleManual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial Eur J Surg 165 1051–4 Occurrence Handle10595609 Occurrence Handle10.1080/110241599750007883 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FmtFSmug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S Law M Fok KM Chu J Wong (1997) ArticleTitleComparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial Ann Surg 226 169–73 Occurrence Handle9296510 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199708000-00008 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH2c7gslY%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. SR Craig WS Walker EW Cameron AJ Wightman (1996) ArticleTitleA prospective randomized study comparing stapled with handsewn oesophagogastric anastomoses J R Coll Surg Edinb 41 17–19 Occurrence Handle8930036 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD1czks1Y%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A Valverde JM Hay A Fingerhut A Elhadad (1996) ArticleTitleManual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: a controlled trial. French Associations for Surgical Research Surgery 120 476–83 Occurrence Handle8784400 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0039-6060(96)80066-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA2sfotlM%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. HH Hsu JS Chen PM Huang JM Lee YC Lee (2004) ArticleTitleComparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25 1097–101 Occurrence Handle15145015 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.02.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. CJ Blewett JD Miller JE Young WF Bennett JD Urschel (2001) ArticleTitleAnastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of thoracic and cervical anastomoses Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 7 75–8 Occurrence Handle11371275 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzivVahtg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. CE Schmidt B Bestmann T Kuchler A Schmid B Kremer (2004) ArticleTitleQuality of life associated with surgery for esophageal cancer: differences between collar and intrathoracic anastomoses World J Surg 28 355–60 Occurrence Handle14994144 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-003-7219-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Y Sato S Motoyama K Maruyama M Okuyama J Ogawa (2005) ArticleTitleA second malignancy is the major cause of death among thoracic squamous cell esophageal cancer patients negative for lymph node involvement J Am Coll Surg 201 188–93 Occurrence Handle16038814 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. S Motoyama M Kitamura R Saito K Maruyama M Okuyama J Ogawa (2006) ArticleTitleOutcome and treatment strategy for mid- and lower-thoracic esophageal cancer recurring locally in the lymph nodes of the neck World J Surg 30 191–8 Occurrence Handle16425071 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-005-0092-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. JD Urschel CJ Blewett WF Bennett JD Miller JE Young (2001) ArticleTitleHandsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Dis Esophagus 14 212–17 Occurrence Handle11869322 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1442-2050.2001.00187.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387jtl2mug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. AL Beitler JD Urschel (1998) ArticleTitleComparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomoses Am J Surg 175 337–40 Occurrence Handle9568667 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00002-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3islKiug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. H Igaki Y Tachimori H Kato (2004) ArticleTitleImproved survival for patients with upper and/or middle mediastinal lymph node metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus treated with 3-field dissection Ann Surg 239 483–90 Occurrence Handle15024309 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000118562.97742.29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. JA Brooks KA Kesler CS Johnson D Ciaccia JW Brown (2002) ArticleTitleProspective analysis of quality of life after surgical resection for esophageal cancer: preliminary results J Surg Oncol 81 185–94 Occurrence Handle12451623 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jso.10175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. M Baba T Aikou S Natsugoe C Kusano M Shimada S Kimura et al. (1997) ArticleTitleAppraisal of ten-year survival following esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus with emphasis on quality of life World J Surg 21 282–5 Occurrence Handle9015171 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002689900229 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC28fptVE%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. H Kuwano M Ikebe K Baba K Kitamura Y Toh H Matsuda et al. (1993) ArticleTitleOperative procedures of reconstruction after resection of esophageal cancer and the postoperative quality of life World J Surg 17 773–6 Occurrence Handle8109116 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01659093 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC2M3htFU%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okuyama, M., Motoyama, S., Suzuki, H. et al. Hand-Sewn Cervical Anastomosis Versus Stapled Intrathoracic Anastomosis After Esophagectomy for Middle or Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. Surg Today 37, 947–952 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3541-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3541-5

Key words

Navigation