Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Portrait of women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes of childbearing age attending diabetes clinics in Italy: the AMD-Annals initiative

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Diabetologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To describe characteristics relevant in case of an unplanned pregnancy for T1D or T2D women of childbearing age.

Methods

We analyzed the 2011 AMD-Annals dataset, compiling information from 300 clinics (28,840 T1D patients and 532,651 T2D patients). A risk score of unfavorable conditions for pregnancy included HbA1c > 8.0%; BMI ≥ 35; systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg; microalbuminuria/proteinuria; use of statins, ACE inhibitors, ARB; use of diabetes drugs other than metformin/insulin.

Results

The proportion of T2D cases increased from 30.8% (95% CI 29.9–32.4) at age 18–30 years to 67.5% (66.6–68.5) at age 36–45 years. The proportion of women with HbA1c < 7.0% was 20.4% (20.0–20.8) in T1D and 43.4% (42.8–43.9) in T2D women. Furthermore, 47.6% (47.0–48.3) of T1D women and 34.5% (33.9–35.0) of T2D women had HbA1c ≥ 8.0%. The prevalence of obesity (BMI ≥ 30) was sevenfold higher among T2D than T1D women [49.9% (49.4–50.5) and 7.4% (7.2–7.5), respectively]. T2D women were more likely to have hypertension or microalbuminuria than T1D women. Almost half of the T2D women were taking drugs not approved during pregnancy. At least one unfavorable condition for starting a pregnancy was present in 51% of T1D women of childbearing age and in 66.7% of T2D women.

Conclusions

Women with either T1D or T2D of childbearing age in Italy were far from the ideal medical condition for conception. Our data strongly support the need for counseling all women with diabetes about pregnancy planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menke A, Casagrande S, Geiss L, Cowie CC (2015) Prevalence of and trends in diabetes among adults in the United States, 1988–2012. JAMA 314(10):1021–1029. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamman RF, Bell RA, Dabelea D et al (2014) The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study: rationale, findings, and future directions. Diabetes Care 37(12):3336–3344. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-0574

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. OECD Family Database, SF2.3: Age of mothers at childbirth and age-specific fertility. https://www.oecd.org/els/soc/SF_2_3_Age_mothers_childbirth.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2016

  4. National pregnancy in diabetes audit report 2014. http://www.hqip.org.uk/resources/pregnancy-in-diabetes-audit-report-2015/. Accessed 17 Oct 2016

  5. Persson M, Norman M, Hanson U (2009) Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancies: a large, population-based study. Diabetes Care 32(11):2005–2009. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0656

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tennant PW, Glinianaia SV, Bilous RW, Rankin J, Bell R (2014) Pre-existing diabetes, maternal glycated haemoglobin, and the risks of fetal and infant death: a population-based study. Diabetologia 57(2):285–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-013-3108-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Egan AM, Danyliv A, Carmody L, Kirwan B, Dunne FP (2016) A prepregnancy care program for women with diabetes: effective and cost saving. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101(4):1807–1815. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-4046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Owens LA, Egan AM, Carmody L, Dunne F (2016) Ten years of optimizing outcomes for women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy—the atlantic dip experience. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101(4):1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-3817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sweet Baby (2017). Abstract 9th International Symposium on Diabetes, Hypertension, Metabolic Syndrome & Pregnancy, Barcelona (Spain), 8–12 March 2017

  10. Rossi MC, Nicolucci A, Arcangeli A et al (2008) Baseline quality-of-care data from a quality-improvement program implemented by a network of diabetes outpatient clinics. Diabetes Care 31(11):2166–2168. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-0469

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nicolucci A, Rossi MC, Arcangeli A et al (2010) Four-year impact of a continuous quality improvement effort implemented by a network of diabetes outpatient clinics: the AMD-Annals initiative. Diabet Med 27(9):1041–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03055.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Annali AMD 2012. http://www.infodiabetes.it/pages/annali/. Accessed 17 Oct 2016

  13. Osservatorio ARNO Diabete. Il profilo assistenziale della popolazione con diabete. Rapporto 2015, Volume XXIII—Collana “Rapporti ARNO”. http://osservatorioarno.cineca.org. Accessed 1 Nov 2017

  14. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM et al (2009) Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 120(16):1640–1645. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cassina M, Donà M, Di Gianantonio E, Litta P, Clementi M (2014) First-trimester exposure to metformin and risk of birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 20(5):656–669. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. European Medicines Agency. European public assessment reports. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/landing/epar_search.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058001d124. Accessed 17 Oct 2016

  17. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (2005) Pregnancy in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in 2002–03, England Wales and Northern Ireland. CEMACH, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Balsells M, García-Patterson A, Gich I, Corcoy R (2009) Maternal and fetal outcome in women with type 2 versus type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94(11):4284–4291. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-1231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lapolla A, Dalfrà MG, Di Cianni G et al (2008) A multicenter Italian study on pregnancy outcome in women with diabetes. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 18(4):291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2006.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. American Diabetes Association (2016) Management of diabetes in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 39(Suppl 1):S94–S98. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-S015

    Google Scholar 

  21. Standard Italiani per la cura del diabete mellito 2016. La cura del diabete prima e durante la gravidanza. http://www.standarditaliani.it/articolo.php?idArticolo=10409. Accessed 17 Oct 2016

  22. Evers AC, Brouwers HA, Hukkelhoven CW et al (2010) Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. BMJ 341:c5639. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jensen DM, Korsholm L, Ovesen P et al (2009) Peri-conceptional A1C and risk of serious adverse pregnancy outcome in 933 women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 32(6):1046–1048. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-2061

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Peterson C, Grosse SD, Li R et al (2015) Preventable health and cost burden of adverse birth outcomes associated with pregestational diabetes in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(1):74.e1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stothard KJ, Tennant PW, Bell R, Rankin J (2009) Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 301(6):636–650. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. ACOG Practice Bulletin No 156 (2015) Obesity in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 126(6):e112–e126. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lei Q, Niu J, Lv L et al (2016) Clustering of metabolic risk factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 32:835–842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Metascreen Writing Committee, Bonadonna R, Cucinotta D, Fedele D, Riccardi G, Tiengo A (2006) The metabolic syndrome is a risk indicator of microvascular and macrovascular complications in diabetes: results from metascreen, a multicenter diabetes clinic-based survey. Diabetes Care 29:2701–2707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. ISTAT. Come cambia la vita delle donne, 2004–2014. https://www.istat.it/it/files/2015/12/come-cambia-la-vita-delle-donne.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2017

  30. Napoli A, Colatrella A, Botta R et al (2005) Contraception in diabetic women: an Italian study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 67(3):267–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Commissione Nazionale Diabete, Piano sulla malattia diabetica. http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/c_17_pubblicazioni_1885_allegato.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2016

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of all professionals of the diabetes centers participating to the AMD-Annals initiative and to thank the Fondazione AMD for providing the opportunity to analyze the 2011 AMD-Annals dataset for the purpose of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

MS and ND planned the study and wrote the manuscript; MCR supervised data analysis and contributed to the writing of the manuscript; MS compiled the dataset and analyzed the data; AN supervised data analysis and critically reviewed the manuscript; VM, GR and SG critically reviewed the manuscript; PDB, CG, NM, AC are guarantor of the AMD-Annals Initiative and critically reviewed the manuscript; CM reviewed the literature and contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Scavini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose regarding the topic of this manuscript.

Human and animal rights

The study reported in this article is a retrospective observational study on patients with diabetes. None of the authors had direct contact with the patients whose data were deidentified at the time of collection by individual diabetes clinics.

Informed consent

For this type of study written informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Managed by Antonio Secchi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scavini, M., Rossi, M.C., Scardapane, M. et al. Portrait of women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes of childbearing age attending diabetes clinics in Italy: the AMD-Annals initiative. Acta Diabetol 55, 193–199 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-017-1076-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-017-1076-9

Keywords

Navigation