Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of pioglitazone on cardiac sympathovagal modulation in patients with type 2 diabetes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Diabetologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of pioglitazone on potential progression of autonomic damage in addition to changes in control of cardiovascular function in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Thirty patients with T2DM and 32 healthy subjects participated in the study. Sympathovagal activity, assessed by power spectral analysis (PSA) of R–R intervals variability, and blood pressure (BP) were studied during clinostatism and orthostatism in controls and patients. We have assessed blood pressure control by 24-hour monitoring of ambulatory blood pressure. Patients were treated with pioglitazone (30 mg/day) for 6 months, and then re-evaluated by PSA for heart rate variability (HRV). Reduced levels of HbA1c (P < 0.0001) and urinary albumin (P = 0.008) were observed in pioglitazone-treated patients compared to untreated baseline levels. Arterial BP remained unchanged following pioglitazone treatment. T2DM patients had reduced HRV (low-frequency power; LF; P < 0.0001 and LF/HF; LF/HF; P < 0.0001) at baseline (clinostatism) compared to controls. Baseline clinostatic differences between groups persisted after pioglitazone treatment and no effect of treatment on basal HRV variables was observed. In controls, HF decreased and LF and LF/HF ratio increased in the orthostatic position. A similar effect for HF was observed in patients, but LF and LF/HF did not increase. The normal difference between HF-power in clinostatism versus orthostatism observed for controls (P < 0.0001) was restored in patients following pioglitazone treatment (P = 0.028). A significant decrease from lying to standing position in orthostatic LF-power (P < 0.0001) and LF/HF (P < 0.0001) was also observed between patients and controls. Although no differences in autonomic control of HRV were observed between controls and patients with T2DM, significant differences were observed in sympathovagal balance following either clinostatic or orthostatic challenge. These findings provide initial evidence of a potential additional benefit afforded by pioglitazone for the improvement of cardiac sympathovagal balance in T2DM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

HRV:

Heart rate variability

PSA:

Power spectral analysis

ECG:

Electrocardiogram

HR:

Heart rate

LF:

Low frequency

HF:

High frequency

References

  1. Reaven GM (1988) Banting Lecture 1988: role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 37:1595–1607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E (1991) Insulin resistance: a multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care 14:173–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liao D, Carnethon M, Evans GW, Cascio WE, Heiss G (2002) Lower heart rate variability is associated with the development of coronary heart disease in individuals with diabetes: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Diabetes 51:3524–3531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Palatini P, Julius S (1997) Heart rate and the cardiovascular risk. J Hypertens 15:3–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ewing D, Campbell I, Clarke B (1980) The natural history of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Q J Med 49:95–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gottsater A, Ahmed M, Fernlund P, Sundkvist G (1999) Autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients is associated with hyperinsulinaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia. Diabet Med 16:49–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vanoli E, Schwartz PJ (1990) Sympathetic-parasympathetic interaction and sudden death. Basic Res Cardiol 85(Suppl 1):305–321

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ziegler D (1994) Diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy: prognosis, diagnosis and treatment. Diabetes Metab Rev 10:339–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Young RJ, Ewing DJ, Clarke BF (1983) Nerve function and metabolic control in teenage diabetics. Diabetes 32:142–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kleiger RE, Stein PK, Bigger JT (2005) Heart rate variability: measurement and clinical utility. Ann Noninvasive Elettrocardiol 10:88–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Low PA, Benrud-Larson LM, Sletten DM, Opfer-Gehrking TL, Weigand SD, O’Brien PC et al (2004) Autonomic symptoms and diabetic neuropathy: a population-based study. Diabetes Care 27:2942–2947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aring AM, Jones DE, Falko JM (2005) Evaluation and prevention of diabetic neuropathy. Am Fam Physician 71:2123–2128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Malliani A (2005) Heart rate variability: from bench to bedside. Eur J Intern Med 16:12–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schernthaner G (2009) Pleiotropic effects of thiazolidinediones on traditional and non-traditional atherosclerotic risk factors. Int J Clin Pract 63:912–929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Aronoff S, Rosenblatt S, Braithwaite S, Egan JW, Mathisen AL, Schneider RL (2000) Pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy improves glycemic control in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes: a 6-month randomized placebo-controlled dose–response study. The pioglitazone 001 study group. Diabetes Care 23:1605–1611

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanefeld M, Marx N, Pfützner A, Baurecht W, Lübben G, Karagiannis E et al (2007) Anti-inflammatory effects of pioglitazone and/or simvastatin in high cardiovascular risk patients with elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein: the PIOSTAT Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:290–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chiquette E, Ramirez G, Defronzo R (2004) A meta-analysis comparing the effect of thiazolidinediones on cardiovascular risk factors. Arch Intern Med 164:2097–2104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ji S, Kronenberg G, Balkaya M, Färber K, Gertz K, Kettenmann H et al (2009) Acute neuroprotection by pioglitazone after mild brain ischemia without effect on long-term outcome. Exp Neurol 216:321–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xing B, Liu M, Bing G (2007) Neuroprotection with pioglitazone against LPS insult on dopaminergic neurons may be associated with its inhibition of NF-kappaB and JNK activation and suppression of COX-2 activity. J Neuroimmunol 192:89–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nerla R, Pitocco D, Zaccardi F, Scalone G, Coviello I, Mollo R et al (2009) Effect of pioglitazone on systemic inflammation is independent of metabolic control and cardiac autonomic function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. doi:10.1007/s00592-009-0150-3

  21. Dorkhan M, Dencker M, Stagmo M, Groop L (2009) Effect of pioglitazone versus insulin glargine on cardiac size, function, and measures of fluid retention in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol 20(8):15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaneda H, Shiono T, Miyashita Y, Takahashi S, Taketani Y, Domae H et al (2009) Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary stent implantation. Heart 95:1079–1084

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Takagi T, Okura H, Kobayashi Y, Kataoka T, Taguchi H, Toda I et al (2009) POPPS Investigators. A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial to assess efficacy of pioglitazone on in-stent neointimal suppression in type 2 diabetes: POPPS (Prevention of In-Stent Neointimal Proliferation by Pioglitazone Study). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:524–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Association AmericanDiabetes (2008) Diagnosis and classification of diabetes. Diabetes Care 31:S55–S60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Baselli G, Cerutti S, Civardi S, Lombardi F, Malliani A, Merri M et al (1987) Heart rate variability signal processing: a quantitative approach as an aid to diagnosis in cardiovascular pathologies. Int J Biomed Computers 20:51–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Malliani A, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Cerutti S (1991) Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain. Circulation 84:482–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bernardi L, Leuzzi S, Radaelli A, Passino C, Johnston JA, Sleight P (1994) Low-frequency spontaneous fluctuations of R-R interval and blood pressure in conscious humans: a baroreceptor or central phenomenon? Clinical Sci 87:649–654

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wray DW, Formes KJ, Weiss MS, O-Yurvati AH, Raven PB, Zhang R et al (2001) Vagal cardiac function and arterial blood pressure stability. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281:H1870–H1880

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Furlan R, Porta A, Costa F, Tank J, Baker L, Schiavi R et al (2000) Oscillatory patterns in sympathetic neural discharge and cardiovascular variables during orthostatic stimulus. Circulation 101:886–892

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hayano J, Mukai S, Fukuta H, Sakata S, Ohte N, Kimura G (2001) Postural response of low-frequency component of heart rate variability is an increased risk for mortality in patients with coronary disease. Chest 120:1942–1952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chowdhary S, Vaile JC, Fletcher J, Ross HF, Coote JH, Townend JN (2000) Nitric oxide and cardiac autonomic control in humans. Hypertension 36:264–269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang CH, Weisel RD, Liu PP, Fedak PW, Verma S (2003) Glitazones and heart failure: critical appraisal for the clinician. Circulation 107:1350–1354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mather KJ, Anderson TJ, Verma S (2001) Insulin action in the vasculature: physiology and pathophysiology. J Vasc Res 38:415–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Manzella D, Carbonella M, Ragno E, Passariello N, Grella R, Paolisso G (2002) Relationship between autonomic cardiac activity, b-cell function, anthropometrics and metabolic indices in type II diabetics. Clinical Endocrinol 57:259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang CH, Ting MK, Verma S, Kuo LT, Yang NI, Hsieh IC et al (2006) Pioglitazone increases the numbers and improves the functional capacity of endothelial progenitor cells in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am Heart J 152:1051.e1–8

    Google Scholar 

  36. Werner C, Kamani CH, Gensch C, Böhm M, Laufs U (2007) The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist pioglitazone increases number and function of endothelial progenitor cells in patients with coronary artery disease and normal glucose tolerance. Diabetes 56:2609–2615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Naoumova RP, Kindler H, Leccisotti L, Mongillo M, Khan MT, Neuwirth C et al (2007) Pioglitazone improves myocardial blood flow and glucose utilization in nondiabetic patients with combined hyperlipidemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:2051–2058

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Herz M, Johns D, Reviriego J, Grossman LD, Godin C, Duran S et al (2003) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of the effects of pioglitazone on glycemic control and dyslipidemia in oral antihyperglycemic medication-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 25:1074–1095

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Schernthaner G, Matthews DR, Charbonnel B, Hanefeld M, Brunetti P (2004) Quartet study group. Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone versus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double-blind, randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:6068–6076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Charbonnel B, Dormandy J, Erdmann E, Massi-Benedetti M, Skene A (2004) PROactive study group. The prospective pioglitazone clinical trial in macrovascular events (PROactive): can pioglitazone reduce cardiovascular events in diabetes? Study design and baseline characteristics of 5238 patients. Diabetes Care 27:1647–1653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Goldberg RB, Kendall DM, Deeg MA, Buse JB, Zagar AJ, Pinaire JA et al (2005) GLAI study investigators: a comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Diabetes Care 28:1547–1554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Weston PJ, James MA, Panerai RB, McNally PG, Potter JF, Thurston H (1998) Evidence of defective cardiovascular regulation in insulin-dependent diabetic patients without clinical autonomic dysfunction. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 42:141–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Medical writing support for this manuscript was provided by Primula Multimedia S.R.L., Pisa, Italy. This support was funded by an unconditional grant from Takeda Italia Farmaceutici S.p.A.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. E. Gianiorio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gianiorio, F.E., Casu, M., Patrone, V. et al. Effect of pioglitazone on cardiac sympathovagal modulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol 48, 283–290 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-011-0258-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-011-0258-0

Keywords

Navigation