Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Animal insulin therapy induces a biased insulin antibody response that persists for years after introduction of human insulin

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Diabetologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Administration of exogenous insulin for the treatment of diabetes is often accompanied by the development of insulin antibodies (IA). These antibodies may affect the patient’s requirement for insulin by acting as an insulin binding reservoir. The improvement of insulin purification in the 1970s and the development of human recombinant insulin both reduced the incidence of IA and their binding levels. This study investigates the parameters affecting IA frequency and binding levels in a cohort of type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients. All patients were treated with human recombinant insulin. About half of the patients had received animal insulin prior to the introduction of human recombinant insulin. We tested the IA frequency and binding level for all serum samples. IA were further analyzed for their epitope specificity comparing human and porcine insulin binding. We found that T1D patients who received animal insulin in the past show significantly higher IA binding levels as compared to patients treated exclusively with human recombinant insulin (IA binding level of 0.9 and 0.25 index, respectively, P = 0.005). T1D patients who received animal insulin in the past showed a relative bias towards porcine insulin, as compared to T1D patients who were treated with human recombinant insulin exclusively (P < 0.0001). We conclude that IA binding level and epitope specificity are biased by treatment with animal insulin. This bias remains for over 20 years after animal insulin treatment is terminated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Diaz JL, Wilkin T (1987) Differences in epitope restriction of autoantibodies to native human insulin (iaa) and antibodies to heterologous insulin (ia). Diabetes 36:66–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Devendra D, Galloway TS, Horton SJ, Evenden A, Keller U, Wilkin TJ (2003) The use of phage display to distinguish insulin autoantibody (iaa) from insulin antibody (ia) idiotypes. Diabetologia 46:802–809. doi:10.1007/s00125-003-1107-7 [Epub 2003 Jun 3]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall TR, Thomas JW, Padoa CJ, Torn C, Landin-Olsson M, Ortqvist E, Hampe CS (2006) Longitudinal epitope analysis of insulin-binding antibodies in type 1 diabetes. Clin Exp Immunol 146:9–14. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03178.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jaeger C, Winter S, Eckhard M, Hardt P, Brendel MD, Bretzel RG (2008) Binding characteristics and crossreactivity of insulin autoantibodies and insulin antibodies directed to three different insulin molecules. Acta Diabetol 45:191–194. doi:10.1007/s00592-008-0041-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bingley PJ, Christie MR, Bonifacio E, Bonfanti R, Shattock M, Fonte MT, Bottazzo GF, Gale EA (1994) Combined analysis of autoantibodies improves prediction of iddm in islet cell antibody-positive relatives. Diabetes 43:1304–1310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schernthaner G (1993) Immunogenicity and allergenic potential of animal and human insulins. Diabetes Care 16(Suppl 3):155–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fineberg SE, Galloway JA, Fineberg NS, Rathbun MJ, Hufferd S (1983) Immunogenicity of recombinant DNA human insulin. Diabetologia 25:465–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fineberg SE, Kawabata T, Finco-Kent D, Liu C, Krasner A (2005) Antibody response to inhaled insulin in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. An analysis of initial phase ii and iii inhaled insulin (exubera) trials and a two-year extension trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:3287–3294. doi:10.1210/jc.2004-2229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chute EP, Rupp WM, Rohde TD, Goldenberg FJ, Bordewich PH, Hitchcock CR, Blackshear PJ, Buchwald H (1984) Continuous single-rate long-term insulin infusion using a totally implantable pump. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 30:387–389

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaillous L, Lefevre H, Thivolet C, Boitard C, Lahlou N, Atlan-Gepner C, Bouhanick B, Mogenet A, Nicolino M, Carel JC, Lecomte P, Marechaud R, Bougneres P, Charbonnel B, Sai P (2000) Oral insulin administration and residual beta-cell function in recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Diabete insuline orale group. Lancet 356:545–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pozzilli P, Pitocco D, Visalli N, Cavallo MG, Buzzetti R, Crino A, Spera S, Suraci C, Multari G, Cervoni M, Manca Bitti ML, Matteoli MC, Marietti G, Ferrazzoli F, Cassone Faldetta MR, Giordano C, Sbriglia M, Sarugeri E, Ghirlanda G (2000) No effect of oral insulin on residual beta-cell function in recent- onset type 1 diabetes (the imdiab vii). Imdiab group. Diabetologia 43:1000–1004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garg S, Rosenstock J, Silverman BL, Sun B, Konkoy CS, De La Pena A, Muchmore DB (2006) Efficacy and safety of preprandial human insulin inhalation powder versus injectable insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 49:891–899. doi:10.1007/s00125-006-0161-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu L, Robles DT, Abiru N, Kaur P, Rewers M, Kelemen K, Eisenbarth GS (2000) Early expression of antiinsulin autoantibodies of humans and the nod mouse: evidence for early determination of subsequent diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:1701–1706. doi:10.1073/pnas.040556697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hampe CS, Hammerle LP, Bekris L, Ortqvist E, Kockum I, Rolandsson O, Landin-Olsson M, Torn C, Persson B, Lernmark A (2000) Recognition of glutamic acid decarboxylase (gad) by autoantibodies from different gad antibody-positive phenotypes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4671–4679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rolandsson O, Hägg E, Hampe C, Sullivan EP, Nilsson M, Jansson G, Hallmans G, Lernmark Å (1999) Levels of glutamate decarboxylase (gad65) and tyrosine phosphatase-like protein (ia-2) autoantibodies in the general population are related to glucose intolerance and body mass index. Diabetologia 42:555–559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bingley PJ, Bonifacio E, Mueller PW (2003) Diabetes antibody standardization program: first assay proficiency evaluation. Diabetes 52:1128–1136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Francis AJ, Hanning I, Alberti KG (1985) The influence of insulin antibody levels on the plasma profiles and action of subcutaneously injected human and bovine short acting insulins. Diabetologia 28:330–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Peters A, Klose O, Hefty R, Keck F, Kerner W (1995) The influence of insulin antibodies on the pharmacokinetics of nph insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with human insulin. Diabet Med 12:925–930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Walford S, Allison SP, Reeves WG (1982) The effect of insulin antibodies on insulin dose and diabetic control. Diabetologia 22:106–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ludvigsson J (1984) Insulin antibodies in diabetic children treated with monocomponent porcine insulin from the onset: relationship to b-cell function and partial remission. Diabetologia 26:138–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Keilacker H, Rjasanowski I, Ziegler M, Michaelis D, Woltanski KP, Besch W (1986) The role of insulin antibodies in insulin treatment of type i diabetes. Exp Clin Endocrinol 87:79–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sakata S, Matsuda M, Komaki T, Miura K (1986) Effect of anti-insulin antibodies on glycemic control in insulin treated diabetic patients. Immunol Invest 15:791–799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Richter B, Neises G (2005) ‘Human’ insulin versus animal insulin in people with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003816. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003816.pub2

  24. Fineberg SE, Galloway JA, Fineberg NS, Goldman J (1983) Effects of species of origin, purification levels, and formulation on insulin immunogenicity. Diabetes 32:592–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was performed as independent research sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (DK53456), as well as by DK53004, DK26190, to Dr. Åke Lernmark, and by DK17047. T-T TP was funded through the National Institute of Health (the UW GenOM Project (P50HG02360-08) and the UW Microscale Life Sciences CenterMicroscale Life Sciences Center (HG002360-07)). We wish to thank Vasile M. Bota for expert help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiane S. Hampe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oak, S., Phan, TH.T., Gilliam, L.K. et al. Animal insulin therapy induces a biased insulin antibody response that persists for years after introduction of human insulin. Acta Diabetol 47, 131–135 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-009-0135-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-009-0135-2

Keywords

Navigation