Abstract
A low educational level and a poor socioeconomic status could be associated with increased risk for chronic diseases. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between the educational level and cardiometabolic risk in adult patients with type 1 diabetes (n = 437; age: 38.0 ± 10.4 years, duration of diabetes: 19.2 ± 11.1 years; x ± SD). Educational levels were classified as low [primary school, n = 56 (12.8%)], middle [high school, n = 251 (57.4%)] or high [university, n = 130 (29.7%)]. The prevalence rate of the metabolic syndrome proved to be higher in patients with low versus high educational levels (ATP-III criteria: 42.9 vs. 21.5%, P = 0.0006). Antihypertensive treatment and cardiovascular diseases were more prevalent in patients with low versus high educational level (46.4 vs. 26.2%, P = 0.01; 12.5 vs. 2.3%, P = 0.02; respectively). Overall glycemic control was worse in patients with low versus high educational level (HbAlc: 8.8 ± 1.6 vs. 7.9 ± 1.4%; P = 0.0006). Patients with low versus high educational level differed significantly regarding smoking habits (smokers: 28.6 vs. 11.6%; P = 0.01) and regular physical activity (5.4 vs. 33.1%; P = 0.0001). Higher prevalence rate of certain cardiometabolic risk factors was associated with low educational level in middle-aged type 1 diabetic patients with relatively long duration of diabetes; therefore, these patients should have priority when preventing cardiovascular complications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Kaplan GA, Keil JE (1993) Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature. Circulation 88:1973–1998
Wamala SP, Lynch J, Horsten M, Mittleman MA, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Orth-Gomer K (1999) Education and the metabolic syndrome in women. Diabetes Care 22:1999–2003
Kerényi Z, Tabák AG, Stella P, Bosnyák Z, Simon K, Karádi I, Tamás G (2000) Association between socioeconomic factors and the metabolic syndrome in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 23:1444–1445
Maty SC, Everson-Rose SA, Haan MN, Raghunathan TE, Kaplan GA (2005) Education, income, occupation, and the 34-year incidence (1965–1999) of Type 2 diabetes in the Alameda County study. Int J Epidemiol 34:1274–1281
Hidvégi T, Hetyési K, Bíró L, Gy Jermendy (2001) Education level and clustering of clinical characteristics of metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 24:2013–2014
Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults: executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) (2001) JAMA 285:2486–2497
Hassan K, Loar R, Anderson BJ, Heptulla RA (2006) The role of socioeconomic status, depression, quality of life, and glycemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr 149:526–531
Thorn LM, Forsblom C, Fagerudd J, Thomas MC, Pettersson-Fernholm K, Saraheimo M, Wadén J, Rönnback M, Rosengård-Bärlund M, Björkesten CG, Taskinen MR, Groop PH, FinnDiane Study Group (2005) Metabolic syndrome in type 1 diabetes: association with diabetic nephropathy and glycemic control (the FinnDiane study). Diabetes Care 28:2019–2024
Ball K, Crawford D (2005) Socioeconomic status and weight change in adults: a review. Soc Sci Med 60:1987–2010
Davis TM, Bruce DG, Davis WA (2007) Prevalence and prognostic implications of the metabolic syndrome in community-based patients with type 1 diabetes: the Fremantle diabetes study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 78:412–417
Acknowledgments
The contributing work from Zsolt Verbőczy (Planimeter Ltd, Budapest) to the statistical analysis is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nádas, J., Putz, Z., Fövényi, J. et al. Cardiometabolic risk and educational level in adult patients with type 1 diabetes. Acta Diabetol 46, 159–162 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-008-0065-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-008-0065-4