Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of elevated liners in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature

  • General Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Instability remains one of the most frequent complications requiring revision surgery after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Elevated liners are often utilized to reduce the risk of dislocation; however, the literature is inconclusive, with no systematic reviews summarizing the data. Thus, this systematic review aimed to establish a consensus for the efficacy of elevated liners in primary THA by determining rates of overall revision and revision specifically for recurrent dislocation.

Materials and methods

This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible randomized-controlled trials and observational studies reporting on the use of elevated liners in primary total hip arthroplasty were identified through May 2020. A random effects model meta-analysis was conducted, and the I2 statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity.

Results

Eight studies met inclusion criteria, and overall, 26,507 patients undergoing primary THA with use of an elevated liner were included. In aggregate, the most common cause of revision was recurrent hip dislocation (1.3%, N = 82/6,267) followed by joint infection (1.2%, N = 45/3,772) and acetabular loosening (0.3%, N = 10/3,772). Notably, elevated liners were associated with a lower risk of revision for recurrent dislocation compared to neutral liners (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55–1.00; p = 0.048).

Conclusion

This review found that after primary THA with the use of elevated liners, hip dislocation and prosthetic joint infection continued to be the most frequent reasons for revision surgery. However, elevated liners had a lower risk of revision for recurrent dislocation compared to neutral liners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF (2002) Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1788–1792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson MJ, Murray WR, Skinner HB (1994) Constrained acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 9:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-5403(94)90133-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, Rachbauer F, Eibl G, Stöckl B (2005) Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:762–769. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B6.14745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourne RB, Mehin R (2004) The dislocating hip: what to do, what to do. J Arthroplasty 19:111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Jt Surg-Am 91:128–133. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carter AH, Sheehan EC, Mortazavi SMJ, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J (2011) Revision for recurrent instability: What are the predictors of failure? J Arthroplasty 26:46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cobb TK, Morrey BF, Ilstrup DM (1996) The elevated-rim acetabular liner in total hip arthroplasty: relationship to postoperative dislocation*. J Bone Jt Surg 78:80–86. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199601000-00011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cobb TK, Morrey BF, Ilstrup DM (1997) Effect of the elevated-rim acetabular liner on loosening after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1361–1364. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199709000-00010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N, Cook JL, Wark JD (2000) Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0838.2000.010001002.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Conroy JL, Whitehouse SL, Graves SE, Pratt NL, Ryan P, Crawford RW (2008) Risk factors for revision for early dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:867–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Furmanski J, Anderson M, Bal S, Greenwald AS, Halley D, Penenberg B, Ries M, Pruitt L (2009) Clinical fracture of cross-linked UHMWPE acetabular liners. Biomaterials 30:5572–5582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guyen O (2016) Constrained liners, dual mobility or large diameter heads to avoid dislocation in THA. EFORT Open Rev 1:197–204. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.1.000054

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hau R, Hammeschlag J, Law C, Wang KK (2018) Optimal position of lipped acetabular liners to improve stability in total hip arthroplasty-an intraoperative in vivo study. J Orthop Surg 13:289. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1000-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hemmilä M, Karvonen M, Laaksonen I, Matilainen M, Eskelinen A, Haapakoski J, Puhto A-P, Kettunen J, Manninen M, Mäkelä KT (2019) Survival of 11,390 Continuum cups in primary total hip arthroplasty based on data from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 90:312–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1603596

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Incavo SJ, Beynnon BD, Coughlin KM (2008) Total hip arthroplasty with the secur-fit and secur-fit plus femoral stem design. J Arthroplasty 23:670–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Insull PJ, Cobbett H, Frampton CM, Munro JT (2014) The use of a lipped acetabular liner decreases the rate of revision for instability after total hip replacement: a study using data from the New Zealand Joint Registry. Bone Jt J 96-B:884–888. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.33658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Judge A, Chard J, Learmonth I, Dieppe P (2006) The effects of surgical volumes and training centre status on outcomes following total joint replacement: analysis of the Hospital Episode Statistics for England. J Public Health Oxf Engl 28:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdl003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kraay M (2018) Hip Instability: cause and management. Orthop Proc Br Editor Soc Bone Jt Surg 41

  19. Krushell RJ, Burke DW, Harris WH (1991) Elevated-rim acetabular components Effect on range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 6(Suppl):S53–S58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kwon MS, Kuskowski M, Mulhall KJ, Macaulay W, Brown TE, Saleh KJ (2006) Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop 447:34–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000218746.84494.df

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Manley M, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz SM (2008) Effect of volume on total hip arthroplasty revision rates in the United States medicare population. J Bone Jt Surg-Am 90:2446–2451. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McCollum DE, Gray WJ (1990) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop 159–170

  23. Merle C, Grammatopoulos G, Waldstein W, Pegg E, Pandit H, Aldinger PR, Gill HS, Murray DW (2013) Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:e172. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Morrey BF (1992) Instability after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 23:237–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nicholas RM, Orr JF, Mollan RA, Calderwood JW, Nixon JR, Watson P (1990) Dislocation of total hip replacements. A comparative study of standard, long posterior wall and augmented acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:418–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Noticewala M, Murtaugh TS, Danoff J, Cunn GJ, Shah RP, Geller J (2018) Has the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty performed for displaced femoral neck fracture improved with modern implants? J Clin Orthop Trauma 9:281–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pryce G, Sabu B, Al-Hajjar M, Wilcox R, Thompson J, Board T, Williams S (2019) Effects of using a lipped liner on the occurence of impingement in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Proc Br Editor Soc Bone Jt Surg 141

  29. Qassem DM, Smith KB (2004) Effect of elevated-rim acetabular liner and 32-mm femoral head on stability in total hip arthroplasty. Saudi Med J 25:88–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sakai T, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Miki H, Takao M, Sugano N (2010) A modular femoral neck and head system works well in cementless total hip replacement for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92-B:770–776. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B6.23001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shin WC, Moon NH, Jeon SB, Suh KT (2019) Comparison of surgical outcomes between standard and elevated-rim highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners in primary total hip arthroplasty with minimum 15-year follow-up: single-center. Retrospective Cohort Study J Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shon WY, Baldini T, Peterson MG, Wright TM, Salvati EA (2005) Impingement in total hip arthroplasty a study of retrieved acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 20:427–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sierra RJ, Raposo JM, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME (2005) Dislocation of primary THA done through a posterolateral approach in the elderly. Clin Orthop 441:262–267. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000194308.23105.f4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Solomon DH, Losina E, Baron JA, Fossel AH, Guadagnoli E, Lingard EA, Miner A, Phillips CB, Katz JN (2002) Contribution of hospital characteristics to the volume-outcome relationship: dislocation and infection following total hip replacement surgery. Arthritis Rheum 46:2436–2444. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Soong M, Rubash HE, Macaulay W (2004) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:314–321. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200409000-00006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tower SS, Currier JH, Currier BH, Lyford KA, Van Citters DW, Mayor MB (2007) Rim cracking of the cross-linked longevity polyethylene acetabular liner after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 89:2212–2217. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Werner BC, Brown TE (2012) Instability after total hip arthroplasty. World J Orthop 3:122–130. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v3.i8.122

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wyatt MC, Whitehouse MR, Kieser DC, Frampton CMA, Hooper GJ (2020) Are lipped polyethylene liners associated with increased revision rates in patients with uncemented acetabular components? An observational cohort study. Clin Orthop 478:581–589. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. No funding was received for conducting this study. No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Gkiatas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

: Dr. Seth A. Jerabek is a paid consultant for Stryker and receives research support from Stryker as well. Dr. Peter K. Sculco is a paid consultant for Depuy Synthes, Intellijoint Surgical, EOS Imaging, and Lima corporate, is a member of the speakers bureau for Depuy Synthes, Intellijoint Surgical, and EOS imaging and receives research support from Intellijoint Surgical.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gkiatas, I., Karasavvidis, T., Sharma, A.K. et al. Use of elevated liners in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 32, 587–594 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03023-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03023-y

Keywords

Navigation