Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Muscle recovery at 1 year after the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery is associated with preoperative and early postoperative muscular strength of the knee extension

  • Original Article • KNEE - SPORT
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury often occurs in young athletes, but it also occurs in middle-aged individuals and the elderly during recreational sports activities. Clinical outcomes after the ACL reconstruction depend on postoperative recovery of muscular strength. The current study aimed to evaluate the recovery of knee extension and flexion strength after ACL reconstruction surgery and to examine the relationship between preoperative and postoperative muscle strength by age and the type of graft used.

Methods

From 2007 to 2010, 32 patients (17 men, 15 women; average age, 31 years; range, 14–66 years) who underwent two-bundle ACL reconstruction surgery using hamstrings, i.e., semitendinous and gracilis tendon (STG) graft, and 25 patients (15 men, 10 women; average age, 28 years; range, 15–59 years) who underwent the ACL reconstruction surgery using bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) graft were included in this study. The muscular strength of the knee extension and flexion compared to non-injury side was measured by an isokinetic dynamometer at a velocity at 60°/s preoperatively, and postoperative measurements were performed at 6, 9 months, and 1 year after the ACL reconstruction surgery.

Results

Covariates that influenced the outcome of the force of knee extension at 12 months were the preoperative muscular strength [p = 0.045, odds ratio (OR): 1.105, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002–1.219] and muscular strength at 6 months after surgery (p = 0.040, OR: 1.155, 95% CI: 1.006–1.326). Only muscle strength at 6 months after surgery influenced the outcome of the force of the knee flexion at 1 year after surgery. In sub-analysis, muscular strength of the knee extension and flexion was greater in the STG group than in the BTB group at 6 months after surgery although there was no difference between muscular strength of the knee extension in the STG group and that in BTB group at 1 year.

Conclusions

Recovery of knee extension strength at a year after ACL reconstruction was significantly associated with preoperative muscular strength and muscle recovery at 6 months. Age and graft type might be related to the muscle strength recovery. Preoperative and early postoperative strength training could improve the recovery of knee extension strength, which would support an earlier return to sports after ACL reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Majewski M, Susanne H, Klaus S (2006) Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: a 10-year study. Knee 13:184–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller MD, Sullivan RT (2001) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in an 84-year-old man. Arthroscopy 1(17):70–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blyth MJ, Gosal HS, Peake WM, Bartlett RJ (2003) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over the age of 50 years: 2–8 year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gee AO, Kinsella S, Huffman GR, Sennett BJ, Tjoumakaris FP (2013) Anterior ligament reconstruction in patients > 40 years: a case-control study. Phys Sportsmed 41:30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baker CL Jr, Jones JC, Zhang J (2014) Long-term outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients 60 years and older. Orthop J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967114561737

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonamo JJ, Fay C, Fierstone T (1990) The conservative treatment of the anterior cruciate deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 18:618–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ciccotti MG, Lombardo SJ, Nonweiler B, Pink M (1994) Non-operative treatment of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament in middle-aged patients: results after long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:1315–1321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Risberg MA, Holm I, Tjomsland O, Ljunggren E, Ekeland A (1999) Prospective study of changes in impairments and disabilities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 29:400–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Snyder-Mackler L, Delitto A, Bailey SL, Stralka SW (1995) Strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle and functional recovery after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of electrical stimulation. J Bone Joint Surg 77:1166–1173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shelbourne KD, Johnson BC (2004) Effects of patellar tendon width and preoperative quadriceps strength on strength return after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with ipsilateral bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. Am J Sports Med 32:1474–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eitzen I, Holm I, Risberg MA (2009) Preoperative quadriceps strength is a significant predictor of knee function two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med 43:371–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Logerstedt D, Lynch A, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L (2013) Pre-operative quadriceps strength predicts IKDC2000 scores 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 20:208–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim DK, Hwang JH, Park WH (2015) Effects of 4 weeks preoperative exercise on knee extensor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Phys Ther Sci 27:2693–2696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Herrington L, Wrapson C, Matthews M, Mathews H (2005) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, hamstring versus bone-patella tendon-bone grafts: a systematic literature review of outcome from surgery. Knee 12:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keays SL, Bullock-Saxton J, Keays AC (2000) Strength and function before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 373:174–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomeé P, Währborg P, Börjesson M, Thomeé R, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (2008) Self-efficacy of knee function as a pre-operative predictor of outcome 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Silkman C, McKeon J (2012) The effect of preoperative quadriceps strength on strength and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Sport Rehabil 21:89–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ueda Y, Matsushita T, Araki D, Kida A, Takiguchi K, Shibata Y, Ono K, Ono R, Matsumoto T, Takayama K, Sakai Y, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2017) Factors affecting quadriceps strength recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autografts in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3213–3219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 198:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  20. Aune AK, Holm I, Risberg MA, Jensen HK, Steen H (2001) Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A randomized study with two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 29:722–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan

    Mitsuru Hanada & Yukihiro Matsuyama

  2. Department of Rehabilitation, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan

    Takanori Yoshikura

Authors
  1. Mitsuru Hanada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takanori Yoshikura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yukihiro Matsuyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuru Hanada.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanada, M., Yoshikura, T. & Matsuyama, Y. Muscle recovery at 1 year after the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery is associated with preoperative and early postoperative muscular strength of the knee extension. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29, 1759–1764 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02479-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02479-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation