Abstract
The goal of this study was to compare the results of a Stack splint compared to a dorsal glued splint in the treatment of tendinous mallet fingers. Our series included 100 patients, aged 47 years in average, among which 40 are women, with a 9-week follow-up. The first 50 patients (group I) were treated with a dorsal glued splint, and the 50 following patients (group II) were treated with a Stack splint. The average lack of active extension of the distal phalanx was 3.1° in group I and 1.74° in group II. The average pain was rated 0.22/10 in group I and 0.26/10 in group II. There were seven cases of nail dystrophies, 18 cases of macerations and five cases of swan neck deformities in group I. There were six cases of macerations and four cases of swan neck deformities in group II. The dorsal nail-glued splint gives comparable results to the Stack splint with the added advantage of leaving the fingertip free.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Valdes K, Naughton N, Algar L (2015) Conservative treatment of mallet finger: a systematic review. J Hand Ther 28:237–245
Alla SR, Deal ND, Dempsey IJ (2014) Current concepts: mallet finger. Hand (N Y) 9:138–144
Salazar Botero S, Hidalgo Diaz JJ, Benaïda A, Collon S, Facca S, Liverneaux PA (2016) Review of acute traumatic closed mallet finger injuries in adults. Arch Plast Surg 43:134–144
Witherow EJ, Peiris CL (2015) Custom-made finger orthoses have fewer skin complications than prefabricated finger orthoses in the management of mallet injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96:1913–1923
Handoll HH, Vaghela MV (2004) Interventions for treating mallet finger injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004574.pub2
Facca S, Nonnenmacher J, Liverneaux P (2007) Treatment of mallet finger with dorsal nail glued splint: retrospective analysis of 270 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 93:682–689
Gruber JS, Bot AG, Ring D (2014) A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing night splinting with no splinting after treatment of mallet finger. Hand (N Y) 9:145–150
Pike J, Mulpuri K, Metzger M et al (2010) Blinded, prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing volar, dorsal, and custom thermoplastic splinting in treatment of acute mallet finger. J Hand Surg Am 35:580–588
Crawford GP (1984) The molded polythene splint for mallet finger deformities. J Hand Surg Am 9:231–237
Kinninmonth AW, Holburn F (1986) A comparative controlled trial of a new perforated splint and a traditional splint in the treatment of mallet finger. J Hand Surg Br 11:261–262
Maitra A, Dorani B (1993) The conservative treatment of mallet finger with a simple splint: a case report. Arch Emerg Med 10:244–248
Stern PJ, Kastrup JJ (1988) Complications and prognosis of treatment of mallet finger. J Hand Surg Am 13:329–334
Lange RH, Engber WD (1983) Hyperextension mallet finger. Orthopedics 6:1426–1431
Stack HG (1986) A modified splint for mallet finger. J Hand Surg Br 11:263
Groth GN, Wilder DM, Young VL (1994) The impact of compliance on the rehabilitation of patients with mallet finger injuries. J Hand Ther 7:21–24
Smit JM, Beets MR, Zeebregts CJ, Rood A, Welters CF (2010) Treatment options for mallet finger: a review. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1624–1629
Patel MR, Desai SS, Bassini-Lipson L (1986) Conservative management of chronic mallet finger. J Hand Surg Am 11:570–573
Alla SR, Deal ND, Dempsey IJ (2014) Current concepts: mallet finger. Hand (N Y) 9:138–144
Auchincloss JM (1982) Mallet-finger injuries: a prospective, controlled trial of internal and external splintage. Hand 14:168–173
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Philippe Liverneaux has conflicts of interest with Newclip Technics, Argomedical, Biomodex, Zimmer Biomet. None of the other authors have conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vernet, P., Igeta, Y., Facca, S. et al. Treatment of tendinous mallet fingers using a Stack splint versus a dorsal glued splint. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29, 591–596 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2349-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2349-x