Skip to main content
Log in

Total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type plate for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis: comparison with uncemented acetabular component

  • Original Article • HIP - ARTHROPLASTY
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) to treat rapidly destructive coxarthrosis (RDC) have been reported, but to our knowledge, there have been no studies comparing implants. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of acetabular reconstruction for RDC by comparing the clinical results of THA using a Kerboull-type plate with an uncemented cup.

Patients and methods

Among 921 primary THAs performed between 2006 and 2014, 27 were performed for the treatment for RDC using a Kerboull-type plate or a conventional uncemented cup. A Kerboull-type plate for acetabular reinforcement device was used in 13 hips and an uncemented cup in 14 hips. The mean follow-up period was 61.2 months.

Results

The duration of surgery was 156.8 ± 36.4 min in the Kerboull-type plate group and 103.3 ± 14.4 min in the uncemented cup group, being significantly longer in the former (P = 0.0002). In the Kerboull-type plate group and the uncemented cup group, the 5-year survival rates were 100 and 83.9 %, respectively. Recurrent dislocation was observed in two cases in which the posterior approach had been used.

Conclusions

In our study, the loosening of the acetabular components was noted in 14.3 % of uncemented cup-applied cases, but no loosening was noted in any Kerboull-type plate-applied case. Therefore, for RDC, in which objective evaluation of fragile bone quality is difficult, the use of the Kerboull-type plate, which disperses weight-bearing of the acetabular, may be an effective means to achieve early functional recovery as well as a long-term favorable outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Postel M, Kerboull M (1970) Total prosthetic replacement in rapidly destructive arthrosis of the hip. Clin Orthop 72:138–144

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenberg ZS, Shankman S, Steiner GC, Kastenbaum DK, Norman A, Lazansky MG (1992) Rapid destructive osteoarthritis: clinical, radiographic, and pathologic features. Radiology 182:213–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bock GW, Garcia A, Weisman MH, Major PA, Lyttle D, Haghighi P, Greenway GD, Resnick D (1993) Rapidly destructive hip disease: clinical and imaging abnormalities. Radiology 186:461–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peters K, Doets C (2009) Midterm results of cementless total hip replacement in rapidly destructive arthroplasty and a review of the literature. Hip Int 19:352–358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuo A, Ezzet KA, Patil S, Colwell CW Jr (2009) Total hip arthroplasty in rapidly destructive osteoarthritis of the hip: a case series. HSS J 5:117–119

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Charrois O, Kahwaji A, Rhami M, Inoue K, Courpied JP (2002) Outcome after total hip arthroplasty performed for rapidly progressive hip destruction.  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 88:236–244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Charrois O, Kahwaji A, Vastel L, Rosencher N, Courpied JP (2001) Blood loss in total hip arthroplasty for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis. Int Orthop 25:22–24

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kawai T, Tanaka C, Ikenaga M, Kanoe H, Okudaira S (2010) Total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis. J Arthroplasty 25:432–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerboull M, Hamadouche M, Kerboull L (2000) The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions. Clin Orthop 378:155–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawanabe K, Akiyama H, Onishi E, Nakamura T (2007) Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:26–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baba T, Shitoto K (2010) Revision of total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull and KT plates. Int Orthop 34:341–347

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9:33–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haenle M, Schlüter S, Ellenrieder M, Mittelmeier W, Bader R (2013) Treatment of acetabular defects during revision total hip arthroplasty—preliminary clinical and radiological outcome using bone substitute materials. Hip Int 23:46–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oonishi H, Yamamoto M, Ishimaru H, Tsuji E, Kushitani S, Aono M, Ukon Y (1989) The effect of hydroxyapatite coating on bone growth into porous titanium alloy implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:213–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oonishi H (1991) Orthopaedic applications of hydroxyapatite. Biomaterials 12:171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mibe J, Imakiire A, Watanabe T, Fujie T (2005) Results of total hip arthroplasty with bone graft and support ring for protrusio acetabuli in rheumatoid arthritis. J Orthop Sci 10:8–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. DeLee JG, Chanley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented socket in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121:20–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boutry N, Paul C, Leroy X, Fredoux D, Migaud H, Cotten A (2002) Rapidly destructive osteoarthritis of the hip: MR imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol (AJR) 179:657–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Watanebe W, Itoi E, Yamada S (2002) Early MRI findings of rapidly destructive coxarthrosis. Skelet Radiol 31:35–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ogawa K, Kitajima M, Shigematsu M, Hotokebuchi T (2004) Clinical Perioperative outcome of total hip arthroplasty in rapidly destructive coxarthrosis (in Japanese). Orthop Traumatol 53:895–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ishii S, Masuda T, Matsuba Y, Ban K, Beppu M (2013) Short term results of total hip arthroplasty for the rapidly destructive coxarthrosis (in Japanese). Jpn J Replace Arthroplasty 43:437–438

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baba T, Shitoto K, Kaneko K (2013) Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture using the direct anterior approach. World J Orthop 4:85–89

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Homma Y, Baba T, Sano K, Ochi H, Matsumoto M, Kobayashi K, Yuasa T, Maruyama Y, Kaneko K (2015) Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury with the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2942-0

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomonori Baba.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the medical research ethics committee at our university.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual patients in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baba, T., Homma, Y., Ochi, H. et al. Total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type plate for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis: comparison with uncemented acetabular component. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26, 189–194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1738-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1738-7

Keywords

Navigation