Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cemented Thompson’s hemiarthroplasty in patients with intracapsular neck of femur fractures: survival analysis of 1,670 procedures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cemented Thompson’s prostheses have been used to treat elderly patients with displaced intracapsular hip fractures at our two units for the last 15 years, amid growing support for the use of newer implant designs for hip hemiarthroplasty. This provided us with an opportunity to investigate survival of the Thompson’s stem in our patients. A retrospective cohort study was set up to review previously collected data on patients who underwent Thompson’s hemiarthroplasty over a 7-year period. These were linked to surgical notes, clinical letters and radiographs to record post-operative course and subsequent admissions and procedures. The identifiers were then linked to mortality data from the Office of ‘National Statistics. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were done for implants and patients. A total of 1,632 patients (mean age 82.7 years) underwent 1,670 procedures. Five-year implant survival was 95.4 %. A total of 36 stems were revised, including 14 revisions to total hip arthroplasty and 22 excision arthroplasties. Reasons for revision included infection (2.1 %), dislocation (1.1 %) and aseptic loosening (0.5 %). Symptomatic aseptic loosening and acetabular erosion occurred late (mean time 3.2 and 5.7 years, respectively following surgery). Aseptic loosening and erosion following hemiarthroplasty are relatively late complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. White SM, Griffiths R (2011) Projected incidence of proximal femoral fracture in England: a report from the NHS Hip Fracture Anaesthesia Network (HIPFAN). Injury 42:1230–1233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson FR (1954) Two and a half years experience with a vitallium intramedullary hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 36A:489–502

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hernigou P, Quiennec S, Guissou I (2014) Hip hemiarthroplasty: from Venable and Bohlman to Moore and Thompson. Int Orthop 38:655–661

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Crossman PT, Khan RJ, MacDowell A, Gardner AC, Reddy NS, Keane GS (2002) A survey of the treatment of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in the UK. Injury 33:383–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. The National Hip Fracture Database (2011) Preliminary National Report 2011. http://www.nhfd.co.uk/20/hipfractureR.nsf/resourceDisplay?openform. Accessed 25 Nov 2013

  6. Parker MJ, Gurusamy KS, Azegami S (2010) Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD001706

  7. Khan RJ, MacDowell A, Crossman P, Keene GS (2002) Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip—a systematic review. Injury 33:13–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. NHS Supply Chain (2012) Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel. http://www.supplychain.nhs.uk/product-areas/orthopaedics/odep. Accessed 25 Nov 2013

  9. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2011) The management of hip fracture in adults (Clinical guideline CG124). http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/13489/54919/54919.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2013

  10. Leonardsson O, Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Akesson K, Rogmark C (2012) Changes in implant choice and surgical technique for hemiarthroplasty. Acta Orthop 83:7–13

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (2011) Annual report 2011. https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/annual-reports-2011. Accessed 25 November 2013

  12. Murray DW, Carr AJ, Bulstrode C (1993) Survival analysis of joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:697–704

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hudson JI, Kenzora JE, Hebel JR, Gardner JF, Scherlis L, Epstein RS, Magaziner JS (1998) Eight-year outcome associated with clinical options in the management of femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 348:59–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Parker MI, Pryor G, Gurusamy K (2010) Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures: a randomised controlled trial in 400 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:116–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruiz-Ibán MA, Crespo-Hernández P, Fernández-Roldán S, Diaz-Herediaa J, Martinez-Urenaa P, Muriel A (2008) Cemented hemiarthroplasty after a femoral neck fracture. Survival analysis. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 52:206–212

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kassam AM, Griffiths S, Higgins G (2014) Historical implant or current best standard? Minimum five year follow-up outcomes of cemented Thompson hemiarthroplasties. J Arthroplast (published online 05 May 2014)

  17. Pajarinen J, Savolainen V, Tulikoura I, Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E (2003) Factors predisposing to dislocation of the Thompson’s hemiarthroplasty: 22 dislocations in 338 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 74:45–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Enocson A, Tidermark J, Tornkvist H, Lapidus LJ (2008) Dislocation of hemiar-throplasty after femoral neck fracture: better outcome after the anterolateral approach in a prospective cohort study on 739 consecutive hips. Acta Orthop 79:211–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Herberts P (2010) Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register annual report 2009. http://www.shpr.se/Libraries/Documents/AnnualReport-2009.sflb.ashx. Accessed 25 Nov 2013

  20. Phillips TW (1989) Thompson’s hemiarthroplasty and acetabular erosion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71-A:913–917

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parker MJ (2012) Cemented Thompson’s hemiarthroplasty versus cemented Exeter Trauma Stem (ETS) hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures: a randomised trial of 200 patients. Injury 43:807–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Petheram TG, Bone M, Joyce TJ, Serrano-Pedraza I, Reed MR, Partington PF (2013) Surface finish of the Exeter Trauma Stem: a cause for concern? Bone Joint J 95-B(2):173–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Howie DW, Middleton RG, Costi K (1998) Loosening of matt and polished cemented femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 80-B:573–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bidwai AS, Willett KM (2012) Comparison of the Exeter Trauma Stem and the Thompson hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures. Hip Int 22:655–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ryg J, Rejnmark L, Overgaard S, Brixen K, Vestergaard P (2009) Hip fracture patients at risk of second hip fracture: a nationwide population-based cohort study of 169,145 cases during 1977–2001. J Bone Miner Res 24:1299–1307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gillam MH, Salter A, Ryan P, Graves SE (2011) Different competing risks models applied to data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Acta Orthop 82:513–520

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2000) Guidance on the Selection of Prostheses for Primary Total Hip replacement. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11386/32002/32002.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2013

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Khan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, S.K., Jameson, S.S., Sims, A. et al. Cemented Thompson’s hemiarthroplasty in patients with intracapsular neck of femur fractures: survival analysis of 1,670 procedures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25, 655–660 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1521-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1521-1

Keywords

Navigation