Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Functional evaluation in cruciate-retaining-type TKA: anatomical relationship between tibial osteotomy level and PCL attachment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The level and morphology of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) attachment vary greatly among individuals, and the function of the PCL after tibial osteotomy performed during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery remains unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the resection amount of PCL attachment and the function of the residual PCL in cruciate-retaining (CR)-type TKA.

Methods

We examined 76 patients with knee osteoarthritis who had undergone CR-type TKA. The level of the tibial PCL attachment was measured by preoperative MRI and the amount resected into the tibial PCL attachment from the osteotomy level as well as the longitudinal diameter of the residual PCL by postoperative radiography. The relationships between these and joint gap tension value at flexion or amount of tibial posterior transfer by postoperative stress radiography were examined.

Results

The longitudinal diameter of the PCL attachment and the attachment level varied widely among patients. There were 39 patients (51 %) with tibial osteotomy level caudal to the PCL attachment. Flexion gap tension in patients with residual PCL (residual PCL group) was slightly higher than those without residual PCL (fully-resected group). There was no correlation between amount of PCL residual and joint gap tension at the flexion position. Even in those without residual PCL, no correlation was observed between the resected amount and flexion joint gap tension value. Comparison of amount of posterior transfer by postoperative stress radiography between those with and without residual PCL revealed no significant difference.

Conclusions

It was confirmed that the level and morphology of the PCL attachment vary greatly among individuals and the amount of PCL resected at tibial osteotomy during TKA surgery varies depending on the patient. The tension due to flexion position tended to decrease if the tibial osteotomy line was caudal to the PCL attachment; however, the amount of tibial posterior transfer due to stress was not changed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Matsunobu T, Iwamoto Y (1999) Knee stability in posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 366:169–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dorr L, Scott R, Ranawat C (1985) Importance of retention of posterior cruciate ligament. In: Ranawat C (ed) Total-condylar knee arthroplasty. Springer, New York, pp 197–202

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Li E, Ritter MA (1995) The case for retension of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Arthroplasty 10:560–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hirsch HS, Lotke PA, Morrison LD (1994) The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee surgery: save, sacrifice, or substitute? Clin Orthop 309:64–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Andriacchi TP, Galante JO (1998) Retention of the posterior cruciate in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3:S13–S19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, Komatsu T, Nakagawa S, Yamano Y (2001) Effects of posterior cruciate ligament resection on the tibiofemoral joint gap. Clin Orthop 391:210–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Insall J, Hood R, Flawn L, Sullivan D (1983) The total condylar knee prosthesis in gonarthrosis. A five to nine-year follow-up of the first one hundred consecutive replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65:619–628

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Straw R, Kulkarni S, Attfield S, Wilton TJ (2003) Posterior cruciate ligament at total knee replacement. Essential, beneficial or a hindrance? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85:671–674

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Misra A, Hussain M, Fiddian N, Newton G (2003) The role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85:389–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mizu-uchi H, Matsuda S, Miura H, Nabeyama R, Okazaki K, Iwamoto Y (2006) Anteroposterior stability in posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:592–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sorger JI, Federle D, Kirk PG, Grood E, Cochran J, Levy M (1997) The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:869–879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA (2007) The attachments of the fiber bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:284–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM (1988) Posterior cruciate ligament balancing during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3:323–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Arima J, Whiteside LA, Martin JW, Miura H, White SE, McCarthy DS (1998) Effect of partial release of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 353:194–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lew WD, Lewis J (1982) The effect of knee-prosthesis geometry on cruciate ligament mechanics during flexion. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64:734

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Worland RL, Jessup DE, Johnson J (1997) Posterior cruciate recession in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:70–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Stuart MJ (1998) Flexion instability after primary posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 356:39–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mihalko WM, Krackow KA (1999) Posterior cruciate ligament effects on the flexion space in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 360:243–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shannon FJ, Cronin JJ, Cleary MS, Eustace SJ, O’Byrne JM (2007) The posterior cruciate ligament-preserving total knee replacement: do we ‘preserve’ it? A radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:766–771

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Andriacchi TP, Stanwyck TS, Galante JO (1986) Knee biomechanics and total knee replacement. J Arthroplasty 1:211–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ryu J (2000) Posterior cruciate ligament preserving with total knee replacement. Kansetsugeka (Joint Surg) 19:34–41 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scott RD, Volatile TB (1986) Twelve years’ experience with posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:100–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Warren PJ, Olanlokun TK, Cobb AG, Bentley G (1993) Proprioception after knee arthroplasty: the influence of prosthetic design. Clin Orthop 297:182–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Simmons S, Lephart S, Rubash H, Borsa P, Barrack RL (1996) Proprioception following total knee arthroplasty with and without the posterior cruciate ligament. J Arthroplasty 11:763–768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Swanik CB, Lephart SM, Rubash HE (2004) Proprioception, kinesthesia, and balance after total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 86:328–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cash RM, Gonzalez MH, Garst J, Barmada R, Stern SH (1996) Proprioception after arthroplasty: role of the posterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop 331:172–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ishii Y, Terajima K, Terashima S, Bechtold JE, Laskin RS (1997) Comparison of joint position sense after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:541–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan

    Masaya Aoki, Takaaki Shishido, Yasuhito Takahashi, Yoichi Katori, Kosuke Kubo, Taichiro Takamatsu & Kengo Yamamoto

Authors
  1. Masaya Aoki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takaaki Shishido
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yasuhito Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yoichi Katori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kosuke Kubo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Taichiro Takamatsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kengo Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaya Aoki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aoki, M., Shishido, T., Takahashi, Y. et al. Functional evaluation in cruciate-retaining-type TKA: anatomical relationship between tibial osteotomy level and PCL attachment. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 1531–1537 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1414-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1414-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation