Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Distraction-free ankle arthroscopy for anterolateral impingement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The origin of chronic pain after external ankle sprain is better known with arthroscopy’s contribution. Chronic hypertrophic synovitis of the anterolateral ankle region is seemingly the cause, resulting in “anterolateral ankle impingement.” But is partial synovectomy with fibrosis resection under arthroscopy always possible without any distraction? Are results affected? This retrospective study concerned only patients with soft tissue ankle impingement. All cases with bone and joint diseases were excluded. The final sample of 24 patients had a mean age of 35 years (21–54 years) and presented anterolateral mechanical pain associated with oedema following external ankle sprain. Medical and rehabilitative treatment was undertaken for more than 6 months before arthroscopy. Average time between trauma and arthroscopy was 21 months (5–60 months). Clinical examination revealed no ankle instability or laxity. Debridement with joint lavage was systematically performed under arthroscopy without any distraction. Average patient follow-up was 22 months (12–92 months). All patients had a good Kitaoka score, with 22 patients registering excellent results. There were no septic complications or algodystrophy. Two transient hypoesthesias were observed in the dorsal surface and lateral border of the foot with full postoperative recovery at 6 months. Distraction was never used and simple dorsiflexion was sufficient to perform arthroscopic debridement. In this study, anterolateral ankle impingement diagnosis was primarily clinical. Arthroscopic treatment yielded significant benefits on pain, oedema and resumption of sport activities. Arthroscopic treatment of anterolateral ankle impingements is thus possible with simple dorsiflexion and no distraction, resulting in a possible decrease in complication rates.

Level of evidence Retrospective cohort study, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kitaoka HB, Lee MD, Morrey BF (1997) Repair and delayed reconstruction for lateral ankle instability: twenty year follow-up study. J Orthop Trauma 11:530–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Seeber PW, Staschiak VJ (2002) Diagnosis and treatment of ankle pain with the use of arthroscopy. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 19:509–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amendola A, Webser-Bogaerts S (1996) Ankle arthroscopy: outcome in 79 consecutive patients. Arthroscopy 12(5):565–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferkel RD, Karzel RP, Del Pizzo W, Friedmann MJ, Fischer SP (1991) Arthroscopic treatment of antero-lateral impingement of the ankle. Am J Sports Med 19:440–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin DF, Baker CL, Curl WW, Andrews JR, Robie DB (1989) Operative ankle arthroscopy long-term follow up. Am J Sports Med 17:16–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meislin RJ, Rose DJ, Parisien JS, Springer S (1993) Arthroscopic treatment of synovial impingement of the ankle. Am J Sports Med 21:186–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wb Stetson, Rd Ferkel (1996) Ankle arthroscopy: indications and results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 4:24–34

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leeuw PA, Dijk CN (2009) Fixed distraction is not necessary for anterior ankle arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1399–1400

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Leeuw PA, Golanó P, Clavero JA, van Dijk CN (2010) Anterior ankle arthroscopy, distraction or dorsiflexion? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(5):594–600

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu H, Niccion S, Finerman G (1997) Diagnosis of antero-lateral impingement. Am J Sport Med 25:389–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Molloy S, Solan MC, Bendall SP (2003) Synovial impingement in the ankle a new physical sign. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(3):330–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tol JL, Van Dijk CN (2006) Anterior ankle impingement. Foot Ankle Clin 11(2):297–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rasmussen S, Hjorth Jensen C (2002) Arthroscopic treatment of impingement of the ankle reduces pain and enhances function. Scand J Med Sci Sports 12:69–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Angelo GL, Ogilve-Harris DJ (1988) Septic arthritis following arthroscopy with cost/benefit analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis. Arthroscopy 4:10–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bauer T, Breda R, Hardy P (2010) Anterior ankle bony impingement with joint motion loss: the arthroscopic resection option. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96(4):462–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Robinson P, White LM (2002) Soft tissue and osseous impingement syndromes of the ankle; role of imaging in diagnosis and management. Radiographics 22(6):1457–1469 [discussion:1470-1]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Basset FH, Gates HS, Billys JB, Morris HB, Nikolaou PK (1990) Talar impingement by the antero-inferior tibio-fibular ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72(1):55–59

    Google Scholar 

  18. Farooki S, Yao L, Seeger L (1998) Anterolateral impingement of the ankle: effectiveness of MR imaging. Radiology 207:357–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Da Rubin, Nw Tischkoff, La Britton, Sf Lonti, Jd Towers (1997) Antero-lateral soft-tissue impingement in the ankle: diagnosis using MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(3):829–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Umans H (2002) Ankle impingement syndrome. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 6:133–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Robinson P, White LM, Salonnen DC, Daniels TR, Ogilvie-Harris D (2001) Anterolateral ankle impingement: MR arthrographic assessment of the anterolateral recess. Radiology 221(1):186–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Albert J, Reiman P, Njus G, Kay DB, Theken R (1992) Ligament strain and ankle joint opening during ankle distraction. Arthroscopy 8:469–473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dowdy PA, Watson BV, Amendola A, Brown JD (1996) Non invasive ankle distraction: relationship between force, magnitude of distraction and nerve conduction abnormalities. Arthroscopy 12(1):64–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Feiwell LA, Frey C (1994) Anatomic study of arthroscopic debridement of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int 15(11):614–621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferkel RD, Heath DD, Guhl JF (1996) Neurological complications of ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 12(2):200–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guhl JF (1988) New concepts (distraction) in ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 4(3):160–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Parisien JS, Vangsness T (1985) Operative arthroscopy of the ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 199:46–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Martin DF, Curl WW, Baker CL (1989) Arthroscopic treatment of chronic synovitis of the ankle. Arthroscopy 5:110–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ogilvie-Harris D (2001) Anterolateral ankle impingement: MR arthrographic assessment of the anterolateral recess. Radiology 221:186–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Gilbart MK, Chorney K (1997) Chronic pain following ankle sprains in athletes: the role of arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy 13:564–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Valentin A, Winge S, Stark A, Eriksson E (1994) Late follow-up results of operative ankle arthroscopy in patients under local anaesthesia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthros 2:250–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Rishika Banydeen for help with English translation.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest relevant to the subject of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology 2C, Pierre Zobda-Quitman University Hospital, BP 632, 97200, Fort-de-France, Martinique, French West Indies

    Jean Louis Rouvillain, Wael Daoud, Adrian Donica & Emmanuel Garron

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Guadeloupe University Hospital, 97110, Les Abymes, Guadeloupe, French West Indies

    André Pierre Uzel

Authors
  1. Jean Louis Rouvillain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wael Daoud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adrian Donica
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emmanuel Garron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. André Pierre Uzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Louis Rouvillain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rouvillain, J.L., Daoud, W., Donica, A. et al. Distraction-free ankle arthroscopy for anterolateral impingement. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 1019–1023 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1357-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1357-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation