Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence of Vertebral artery anomaly in upper cervical and its surgical implications: a systematic review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The presence vertebral artery (VA) abnormalities in the upper cervical may be a potential cause of catastrophic complication in the posterior approach of the upper cervical spine surgery. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the real incidence of the V3 segment anomaly in patients who need upper cervical surgery, and tried to find out the risk factors of V3 segment anomaly to evaluate the necessary of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for upper cervical surgery.

Method

This systematic review was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Retrospective studies and reports of case series involving human subjects with data on anomalies of vertebral artery in upper cervical spine were included. Data on the prevalence of persistent first intersegmental artery (PIA), fenestration of the VA (FA), posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) were extracted.

Results

A total of 16 articles involving 5927 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The total incidence of V3 segment anomaly in the patients with bony abnormalities was 25.9% (74/286): PIA was 17.5%, FA was 6.6% and PICA was 1.8%. The total incidence of V3 segment anomaly in the patients without bony abnormalities was 2.7% (152/5671): PIA was 1.76%, FA was 0.4% and PICA was 0.5%. The total incidence of V3 segment anomaly in Asian population without bony abnormalities was 5.8%, while in European and American population was 0.8 and 0.6%, respectively.

Conclusion

Patients with bone abnormalities are high risk factor for VA abnormalities, CTA is of paramount importance to evaluate the variant VA anatomy. However, regarding to the low incidence of V3 variation in normal population, we do not recommend preoperative CT angiography as mandatory part of preoperative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Yes.

References

  1. Guan Q, Chen L, Long Y, Xiang Z (2017) Iatrogenic vertebral artery injury during anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review. World Neurosurgery 106:715–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Park H, Jho H (2012) The management of vertebral artery injury in anterior cervical spine operation: a systematic review of published cases. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 21:2475–2485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2423-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Heary R, Albert T, Ludwig S, Vaccaro A, Wolansky L, Leddy T, Schmidt R (1996) Surgical anatomy of the vertebral arteries. Spine 21:2074–2080. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199609150-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peng CW, Chou BT, Bendo JA, Spivak JM (2009) Vertebral artery injury in cervical spine surgery: anatomical considerations, management, and preventive measures. The Spine J Official J North Am Spine Soc 9:70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2008.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jt H, Sw L, Bc S, Jh S, Sh Y, Is K, CK P, (2008) Analysis of anatomical variations of bone and vascular structures around the posterior atlantal arch using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. J Neurosurg Spine 8:230–236. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi/2008/8/3/230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Furuya T, Sakuma T, Takahashi H, Kato K, Fujiyoshi T, Mannoji C, Takahashi K, Koda M (2012) Anomalous vertebral arteries in the extra- and intraosseous regions of the craniovertebral junction visualized by 3-dimensional computed tomographic angiography: analysis of 100 consecutive surgical cases and review of the literature. Spine 37:E1389-1397. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826a0c9f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tokuda K, Miyasaka K, Abe H, Abe S, Takei H, Sugimoto S, Tsuru M (1985) Anomalous atlantoaxial portions of vertebral and posterior inferior cerebellar arteries. Neuroradiology 27:410–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. OʼDonnell C, Child Z, Nguyen Q, Anderson P, Lee M, (2014) Vertebral artery anomalies at the craniovertebral junction in the US population. Spine 39:E1053-1057. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vaněk P, Bradáč O, de Lacy P, Konopková R, Lacman J, Beneš V (2017) Vertebral artery and osseous anomalies characteristic at the craniocervical junction diagnosed by CT and 3D CT angiography in normal Czech population: analysis of 511 consecutive patients. Neurosurg Rev 40:369–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0784-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang S, Wang C, Liu Y, Yan M, Zhou H (2009) Anomalous vertebral artery in craniovertebral junction with occipitalization of the atlas. Spine 34:2838–2842. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4fb8b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fortuniak J, Bobeff E, Polguj M, Kośla K, Stefańczyk L, Jaskólski D (2016) Anatomical anomalies of the V3 segment of the vertebral artery in the Polish population. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 25:4164–4170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4675-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ivashchuk G, Fries F, Loukas M, Paulson D, Monteith S, Chapman J, Oskouian R, Tubbs R (2016) Arterial variations around the atlas: a comprehensive review for avoiding neurosurgical complications. Child’s nervous system: ChNS: official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery 32:1093–1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3066-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Solomon R, Natarajan M, Doucet S, Sharma S, Staniloae C, Katholi R, Gelormini J, Labinaz M, Moreyra A (2007) Cardiac Angiography in Renally Impaired Patients (CARE) study: a randomized double-blind trial of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease. Circulation 115:3189–3196. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.671644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sikka A, Jain A (2012) Bilateral variation in the origin and course of the vertebral artery. Anat Res Int 2012:580765. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/580765

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Minor JM, Trost O (2004) Bony ponticles of the atlas (C1) over the groove for the vertebral artery in humans and primates: polymorphism and evolutionary trends. Am J Phys Anthropol 125:16–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang XL, Huang DG, Wang XD, Zhu JW, Li YB, He BR, Hao DJ (2017) The feasibility of inserting a C1 pedicle screw in patients with ponticulus posticus: a retrospective analysis of eleven patients. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 26:1058–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4589-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang J, Xia H, Ying Q, Lu Y, Wu Z, Ai F, Ma X (2013) An anatomic consideration of C2 vertebrae artery groove variation for individual screw implantation in axis. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 22:1547–1552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2779-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim HS, Heller JG, Hudgins PA, Fountain JA (2003) The accuracy of computed tomography in assessing cervical pedicle screw placement. Spine 28:2441–2446. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000090830.94641.ae

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wajanavisit W, Lertudomphonwanit T, Fuangfa P, Chanplakorn P, Kraiwattanapong C, Jaovisidha S (2016) Prevalence of High-Riding Vertebral Artery and Morphometry of C2 Pedicles Using a Novel Computed Tomography Reconstruction Technique. Asian Spine J 10:1141–1148. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1141

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Harms J, Melcher R (2001) Posterior C1–C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine 26:2467–2471. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200111150-00014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Resnick DK, Lapsiwala S, Trost GR (2002) Anatomic suitability of the C1–C2 complex for pedicle screw fixation. Spine 27:1494–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. MK K, SS D, S G, A T, DK S (2019) The C2 pedicle width, Pars Length, and Laminar Thickness in concurrent Ipsilateral Ponticulus Posticus and high-riding vertebral artery: a radiological computed tomography scan-based study. Asian Spine J 13:290–295. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0057

  23. Pękala P, Henry B, Pękala J, Hsieh W, Vikse J, Sanna B, Walocha J, Tubbs R, Tomaszewski K (2017) Prevalence of foramen arcuale and its clinical significance: a meta-analysis of 55,985 subjects. J Neurosurg Spine 27:276–290. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.1.spine161092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Salunke P, Futane S, Sahoo S, Ghuman M, Khandelwal N (2014) Operative nuances to safeguard anomalous vertebral artery without compromising the surgery for congenital atlantoaxial dislocation: untying a tough knot between vessel and bone. J Neurosurg Spine 20:5–10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.9.spine13491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hong JT, Kim IS, Kim JY, Lee HJ, Kwon JY, Kim MS, Sung JH (2016) Risk factor analysis and decision-making of surgical strategy for V3 segment anomaly: significance of preoperative CT angiography for posterior C1 instrumentation. Spine J Official J North Am Spine Soc 16:1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.04.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yamaguchi S, Eguchi K, Kiura Y, Takeda M, Kurisu K (2008) Posterolateral protrusion of the vertebral artery over the posterior arch of the atlas: quantitative anatomical study using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. J Neurosurg Spine 9:167–174. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi/2008/9/8/167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Duan S, He H, Lv S, Chen L (2010) Three-dimensional CT study on the anatomy of vertebral artery at atlantoaxial and intracranial segment. Surgical Radiologic Anat SRA 32:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0552-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wakao N, Takeuchi M, Nishimura M, Riew K, Kamiya M, Hirasawa A, Kawanami K, Imagama S, Sato K, Takayasu M (2014) Vertebral artery variations and osseous anomaly at the C1–2 level diagnosed by 3D CT angiography in normal subjects. Neuroradiology 56:843–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-014-1399-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang H, Chai W, Wang S, Wang Y, Li H (2018) Persistent first intersegmental artery (PFIA) visualized by three-dimensional computed tomography angiography in Chinese population. International J Surg (London, England) 52:233–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Arslan D, Ozer M, Govsa F, Kitis O (2019) Surgicoanatomical aspect in vascular variations of the V3 segment of vertebral artery as a risk factor for C1 instrumentation. J Clin Neurosci Official J Neurosurg Soc Austr 68:243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2019.07.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Deepak AN, Salunke P, Sahoo SK, Prasad PK, Khandelwal NK (2017) Revisiting the differences between irreducible and reducible atlantoaxial dislocation in the era of direct posterior approach and C1–2 joint manipulation. J Neurosurg Spine 26:331–340. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.8.spine16408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. S X, S R, X S, J Y, J X, R G, (2018) Evaluation of vertebral artery anomaly in basilar invagination and prevention of vascular injury during surgical intervention: CTA features and analysis. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 27:1286–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5445-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Moon B, Choi K, Shin D, Yi S, Kim K, Yoon D, Ha Y (2018) Anatomical variations of vertebral artery and C2 isthmus in atlanto-axial fusion: consecutive surgical 100 cases. J Clin Neurosci Official J Neurosurg Soc Austr 53:147–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.04.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work received funding by Startup Fund for scientific research, Fujian Medical University, Grant number:2016098.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XY: direct the whole review; XL: write the manuscript and extract the statistics; H-JZ, F-YL and X-MY primary screen the articles.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yang Xu or Ting Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.)

Humans or animals participants

Additional declarations for articles in life science journals that report the results of studies involving humans and/or animals (Not applicable).

Consent for publication

Yes.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, X., Zhu, HJ., Xu, Y. et al. Prevalence of Vertebral artery anomaly in upper cervical and its surgical implications: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 30, 3607–3613 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07015-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07015-8

Keywords

Navigation