Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transcultural adaptation of the neck disability index to mexican spanish and assessment of its psychometric properties

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To transculturally adapt the Neck Disability Index to Mexican Spanish (NDI-Mx) and to evaluate its psychometric properties.

Methods

Translation and transcultural adaptation of the NDI were conducted according to published guidelines. The test–retest reliability of the NDI-Mx was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC3,1), the student t-test, standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change and Bland–Altman plot. Cronbach’s α coefficient was used to evaluate internal consistency. Floor and ceiling effects were also evaluated. Convergent validity was assessed by comparison of the NDI-Mx with the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) through the Spearman correlation coefficient. Finally, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted.

Results

The sample was composed of 113 subjects (38 men and 75 women) with a mean age of 30 (SD, 12.19) years. All items of the NDI-Mx showed good test–retest reliability (ICC3,1 = 0.86) and good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.85). Floor and ceiling effects were not observed. There was good convergent validity with a high correlation between NDI-Mx and NPQ (ρ = 0.83). The CFA revealed that a one-factor solution fitted adequately the data (χ2(32) = 41.18, p = .13).

Conclusion

The NDI-Mx seems to be a valid and reliable tool that can be used in clinical practice and research on Mexican populations with neck pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langenfeld A, Humphreys BK, de Bie RA, Swanenburg J (2015) Effect of manual versus mechanically assisted manipulations of the thoracic spine in neck pain patients: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0763-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ et al (2008) The Burden and Determinants of Neck Pain in the General Population. Spine. 33:S39–S51. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816454c8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14:409–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrade Ortega JA, Delgado Martínez AD, Ruiz RA (2010) Validation of the spanish version of the neck disability index. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181afea5d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wlodyka-Demaille S, Poiraudeau S, Catanzariti JF et al (2002) French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:376–382. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.30623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vos CJ, Verhagen AP, Koes BW (2006) Reliability and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the neck disability index in patients with acute neck pain in general practice. Eur Spine J 15:1729–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0119-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 25:3186–3191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kline R (2010) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd edn. The Guilford Press, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hains F, Waalen J, Mior S (1998) Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 21:75–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. González T, Balsa A, de Murieta JS et al (2001) Spanish version of the Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire: Reliability and validity. Clin Exp Rheumatol 19:41–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S et al (2009) Measurement Properties of the Neck Disability Index: A Systematic Review. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 39:400-C12. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2009.2930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carretero H, Perez C (2005) Normas para el desarrollo y revision de estudios instrumentales. Int J Clin Heal Psychol 5:521–551

    Google Scholar 

  13. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin Bland J, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Devon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P et al (2007) A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh 39:155–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Byrne BM (2016) Structural equation modeling with amos. Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming, 3th ed. Taylor & Francis, London, UK

  17. Brown TA (2015) Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yao M, Sun YL, Cao ZY et al (2015) A systematic review of cross-cultural adaptation of the neck disability index. Spine. 40:480–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cook C, Richardson JK, Braga L et al (2006) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the brazilian portuguese version of the neck disability index and neck pain and disability scale. Spine. 31:1621–1627. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000221989.53069.16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee H, Nicholson LL, Adams RD et al (2006) Development and psychometric testing of Korean language versions of 4 neck pain and disability questionnaires. Spine. 31:1841–1845. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000227268.35035.a5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Montazeri A et al (2007) Translation and validation study of the Iranian versions of the neck disability index and the neck pain and disability scale. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815ce6dd

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aslan E, Karaduman A, Yakut Y et al (2008) The cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: A Turkish version study. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817144e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McCarthy MJH, Grevitt MP, Silcocks P, Hobbs G (2007) The reliability of the Vernon and Mior neck disability index and its validity compared with the short form-36 health survey questionnaire. Eur Spine J 16:2111–2117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0503-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research has no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.S.R and A.A.L contributed to the design and implementation of the study and to the writing of the first draft and to the revision of the final manuscript. D.P.M contributed to the coordination of the study, to the writing of the first draft and to the revision the final manuscript. R.F.M and T.G.I contributed to data curation and statistical analysis and to the writing of the first draft and to the revision of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Pecos-Martin.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

All authors and subjects who participated in the study consent this study to be published.

Availability of data and material

Data are available upon request.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Committee of Benemérita Universidad Autonóma de Puebla (SIEP/C.I./270/2019).

Consent to participate

All subjects signed a consent form before participating into the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 26 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santiago-Reynoso, G.M., Alvarado-Luna, A.E., Fernandez-Matias, R. et al. Transcultural adaptation of the neck disability index to mexican spanish and assessment of its psychometric properties. Eur Spine J 30, 2654–2660 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06835-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06835-y

Keywords

Navigation