Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cervical laminectomy of limited width prevents postoperative C5 palsy: a multivariate analysis of 263 muscle-preserving posterior decompression cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Between 2006 and 2010, we performed wide laminectomy (wide LAM) alone, with decompression performed between the bilateral medial margin of the zygapophyseal joints, or double-door laminoplasty (DL) combined with wide LAM for cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM). From 2010, instead of wide LAM and DL, we began to perform narrow LAM, where the laminectomy width was no more than 2–3 mm wider than the spinal cord width (SW). This study aimed to elucidate the risk factors for C5 palsy by reviewing surgical outcomes.

Methods

The clinical features and radiological findings of 263 CCM patients with or without C5 palsy were compared. Risk factors for C5 palsy were assessed using logistic regression analysis. The decompression width (DW) was defined as the laminectomy width or the width between the bilateral medial margins of the bony gutters in DL.

Results

Narrow LAM reduced the incidence of C5 palsy from 9.2 to 1.2%. DL was performed more frequently in the C5 palsy group. The difference between the DW and the SW (DW − SW) was significantly greater in the C5 palsy group. Posterior spinal cord shift, aging, and the number of consecutive laminae surgically treated were significantly higher in the C5 palsy group. The diameter of the foramen (DF) at C4/5 was significantly smaller in the C5 palsy patients. The logistic regression analysis revealed that DL, DW − SW, DF, and aging were risk factors for C5 palsy.

Conclusions

Cervical laminectomy of limited width prevented postoperative C5 palsy without compromising the functional recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, Maruiwa H, Matsumoto M, Toyama Y (2006) Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy–average 14-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2998–3005. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000250307.78987.6b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Iwasaki M, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T, Yonenobu K (2002) Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years follow up. J Neurosurg 96:180–189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kato Y, Iwasaki M, Fuji T, Yonenobu K, Ochi T (1998) Long-term follow-up results of laminectomy for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg 89:217–223. doi:10.3171/jns.1998.89.2.0217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Imagama S, Matsuyama Y, Yukawa Y, Kawakami N, Kamiya M, Kanemura T, Ishiguro N (2010) C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty: a multicentre study. J Bone Jt Surg Br 92:393–400. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.92b3.22786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fan D, Schwartz DM, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Albert TJ (2002) Intraoperative neurophysiologic detection of iatrogenic C5 nerve root injury during laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2499–2502. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000031313.90883.29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiba K, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M, Maruiwa H, Watanabe M, Hirabayashi K (2002) Segmental motor paralysis after expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2108–2115. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000025693.11896.b3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shiraishi T, Kato M, Yato Y, Ueda S, Aoyama R, Yamane J, Kitamura K (2012) New techniques for exposure of posterior cervical spine through intermuscular planes and their surgical application. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E286–E296. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318239cc7e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shiraishi T, Fukuda K, Yato Y, Nakamura M, Ikegami T (2003) Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2667–2672. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000103340.78418.b2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shiraishi T, Yato Y (2002) New double-door laminoplasty procedure for the axis to preserve all muscular attachments to the spinous process: technical note. Neurosurg Focus 12:E9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Hase H, Yato Y, Ueda S, Mikami Y, Harada T, Ikeda T, Kubo T (2005) Is posterior spinal cord shifting by extensive posterior decompression clinically significant for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2414–2419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bydon M, Macki M, Kaloostian P, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Belzberg AJ, Bydon A, Witham TF (2014) Incidence and prognostic factors of c5 palsy: a clinical study of 1001 cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 74:595–604. doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000000322 (discussion 604–595)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakashima H, Imagama S, Yukawa Y, Kanemura T, Kamiya M, Yanase M, Ito K, Machino M, Yoshida G, Ishikawa Y, Matsuyama Y, Hamajima N, Ishiguro N, Kato F (2012) Multivariate analysis of C-5 palsy incidence after cervical posterior fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 17:103–110. doi:10.3171/2012.4.spine11255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gu Y, Cao P, Gao R, Tian Y, Liang L, Wang C, Yang L, Yuan W (2014) Incidence and risk factors of C5 palsy following posterior cervical decompression: a systematic review. PLoS One 9:e101933. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101933

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hasegawa K, Homma T, Chiba Y (2007) Upper extremity palsy following cervical decompression surgery results from a transient spinal cord lesion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:E197–E202. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000257576.84646.49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Takenaka S, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Miwa T, Fuji T (2013) The use of cooled saline during bone drilling to reduce the incidence of upper-limb palsy after cervical laminoplasty: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19:420–427. doi:10.3171/2013.7.spine13144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, Zhongshi L (1996) Extradural tethering effect as one mechanism of radiculopathy complicating posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:203–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baba S, Ikuta K, Ikeuchi H, Shiraki M, Komiya N, Kitamura T, Senba H, Shidahara S (2016) Risk factor analysis for c5 palsy after double-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Asian Spine J 10:298–308. doi:10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.298

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Klement MR, Kleeman LT, Blizzard DJ, Gallizzi MA, Eure M, Brown CR (2016) C5 palsy after cervical laminectomy and fusion: does width of laminectomy matter? Spine J 16:462–467. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsuzuki N, Zhogshi L, Abe R, Saiki K (1993) Paralysis of the arm after posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. I. Anatomical investigation of the mechanism of paralysis. Eur Spine J 2:191–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Radcliff KE, Limthongkul W, Kepler CK, Sidhu GD, Anderson DG, Rihn JA, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ (2014) Cervical laminectomy width and spinal cord drift are risk factors for postoperative C5 palsy. J Spinal Disord Tech 27:86–92. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31824e53af

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shiozaki T, Otsuka H, Nakata Y, Yokoyama T, Takeuchi K, Ono A, Numasawa T, Wada K, Toh S (2009) Spinal cord shift on magnetic resonance imaging at 24 hours after cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:274–279. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318194e275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee HJ, Ahn JS, Shin B, Lee H (2017) C4/5 foraminal stenosis predicts C5 palsy after expansive open-door laminoplasty. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5077-8

    Google Scholar 

  23. Katsumi K, Yamazaki A, Watanabe K, Ohashi M, Shoji H (2013) Analysis of C5 palsy after cervical open-door laminoplasty: relationship between C5 palsy and foraminal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 26:177–182. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31823db346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sasai K, Saito T, Akagi S, Kato I, Ohnari H, Iida H (2003) Preventing C5 palsy after laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1972–1977. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000083237.94535.46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hosono N, Miwa T, Mukai Y, Takenaka S, Makino T, Fuji T (2009) Potential risk of thermal damage to cervical nerve roots by a high-speed drill. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91:1541–1544. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.91b11.22196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tateru Shiraishi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests to report concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings described in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nori, S., Aoyama, R., Ninomiya, K. et al. Cervical laminectomy of limited width prevents postoperative C5 palsy: a multivariate analysis of 263 muscle-preserving posterior decompression cases. Eur Spine J 26, 2393–2403 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5202-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5202-8

Keywords

Navigation