Abstract
Study design
The investigation was based on finite-element simulations.
Objective
Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is an effective but technical demanding surgical technique, associated with a high risk of rod failure. The present study aims at investigating the role of the anterior support in combination with PSO, with a numerical comparative analysis.
Methods
An osteotomy was simulated at the L3 level of a lumbosacral spine. An implantation of various combinations of devices for the anterior (1 or 2 cages of different material) and posterior stabilization (1 or 2 rods) was then performed. ROM, loads, and stresses acting on the rods were calculated.
Results
A 4–8% reduction of the ROM was obtained introducing one or two cages in the instrumented model. However, the anterior support had only a minor influence on the ROM. The load on the posterior instrumentation decreased up to 8% using one cage and about 15% with two anterior devices. A 20–30% reduction of the stresses on the rods was calculated inserting one cage and up to 50% using two cages. Following the introduction of the anterior support, the greatest stress reduction was observed in the model having two cages and spinal fixators with two rods.
Conclusions
The use of cages is crucial to ensure anterior support and decrease loads and stresses on the posterior instrumentation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berjano P, Aebi M (2015) Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) in the lumbar spine for sagittal deformities. Eur Spine J 24(1S):49–57
Luca A, Lovi A, Galbusera F, Brayda-Bruno M (2014) Revision surgery after PSO failure with rod breakage: a comparison of different techniques. Eur Spine J 23(6S):610–615
Enercan M, Ozturk C, Kahraman S, Sarer M, Hamzaoglu A, Alanay A (2013) Osteotomies/spinal column resections in adult deformity. Eur Spine J 22(2S):254–264
Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K (2003) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(3):454–463
Kim YC, Lenke LG, Hyun SJ, Lee JH, Koester LA, Blanke KM (2014) Results of revision surgery after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance with pseudarthrosis at the prior osteotomy site or elsewhere: minimum 5 years post-revision. Spine 39(21):1817–1828
Deviren V, Tang JA, Scheer JK et al (2012) Construct rigidity after fatigue loading in pedicle subtraction osteotomy with or without adjacent interbody structural cages. Glob spine J 2(4):213–220
Ottardi C, Galbusera F, Luca A et al (2016) Finite element analysis of the lumbar destabilization following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Med Eng Phys 38:506–509
Luca A, Ottardi C, Sasso M, Prosdocimo L, La Barbera L, Brayda-Bruno M, Galbusera F, Villa T (2017) Instrumentation failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter and multi-rod constructs. Eur Spine J 26(3):764–770. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4859-8
Charosky S, Moreno P, Maxy P (2014) Instability and instrumentation failures after a PSO: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J 23(11):2340–2349
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have any potential conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luca, A., Ottardi, C., Lovi, A. et al. Anterior support reduces the stresses on the posterior instrumentation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite-element study. Eur Spine J 26 (Suppl 4), 450–456 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5084-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5084-9