Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative analysis of the prevalence and characteristics of cervical malalignment in adults presenting with thoracolumbar spine deformity based on variations in treatment approach over 2 years

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Characteristics specific to cervical deformity (CD) concomitant with adult thoracolumbar deformity (TLD) remains uncertain, particularly regarding treatment. This study identifies cervical malalignment prevalence following surgical and conservative TLD treatment through 2 years.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter adult spinal deformity (ASD) database. CD was defined in operative and non-operative ASD patients according to the following criteria: T1 Slope minus Cervical Lordosis (T1S-CL) ≥20°, C2–C7 Cervical Sagittal Vertical Axis (cSVA) ≥40 mm, C2–C7 kyphosis >10°. Differences in rates, demographics, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22r), and radiographic variables were assessed between treatment groups (Op vs. Non-Op) and follow-up periods (baseline, 1-year, 2-year).

Results

Three hundred and nineteen (200 Op, 199 Non-Op) ASD patients were analyzed. Op patients’ CD rates at 1 and 2 years were 78.9, and 63.0 %, respectively. Non-Op CD rates were 21.1 and 37.0 % at 1 and 2 years, respectively. T1S-CL mismatch and cSVA malalignment characterized Op CD at 1 and 2 years (p < 0.05). Op and Non-Op CD groups had similar cervical/global alignment at 1 year (p > 0.05 for all), but at 2 years, Op CD patients had worse thoracic kyphosis (TK), T1S-CL, CL, cSVA, C2–T3 SVA, and global SVA compared to Non-Ops (p < 0.05). Op CD patients had worse ODI, and SRS Activity at 1 and 2 years post-operative (p < 0.05), but had greater 2-year SRS Satisfaction scores (p = 0.019).

Conclusions

In the first study to compare cervical malalignment at extended follow-up between ASD treatments, CD rates rose overall through 2 years. TLD surgery, resulting in higher CD rates characterized by T1S-CL and cSVA malalignment, produced poorer HRQoL. This information can aid in treatment method decision-making when cervical deformity is present concomitant with TLD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ha Y, Schwab FJ, Lafage V et al (2014) Reciprocal changes in cervical spine alignment after corrective thoracolumbar deformity surgery. Eur Spine J 23:552–559. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2953-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Protopsaltis TS, Scheer JK, Terran JS et al (2015) How the neck affects the back: changes in regional cervical sagittal alignment correlate to HRQOL improvement in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 23:153–158. doi:10.3171/2014.11.SPINE1441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oh T, Scheer JK, Eastlack R et al (2015) Cervical compensatory alignment changes following correction of adult thoracic deformity: a multicenter experience in 57 patients with a 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 22:1–8. doi:10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14829

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V et al (2012) Spontaneous improvement of cervical alignment after correction of global sagittal balance following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. J Neurosurg Spine 17:300–307. doi:10.3171/2012.6.SPINE1250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cecchinato R, Langella F, Bassani R et al (2014) Variations of cervical lordosis and head alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy surgery for sagittal imbalance. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 6):644–649. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3546-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blondel B, Schwab FJ, Bess S et al (2013) Posterior global malalignment after osteotomy for sagittal plane deformity: it happens and here is why. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E394–E401. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182872415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer JK et al (2013) Cervical radiographic alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f449

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scheer JK, Ames CP, Deviren V (2013) Assessment and treatment of cervical deformity. Neurosurg Clin N Am 24:249–274. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2012.12.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JS, Youn MS, Shin JK et al (2014) Relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3491-8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith JS, Lafage V, Schwab FJ et al (2014) Prevalence and type of cervical deformity among 470 adults with thoracolumbar deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:E1001–E1009. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Passias PG, Soroceanu A, Smith J et al (2015) Postoperative cervical deformity in 215 thoracolumbar patients with adult spinal deformity: prevalence, risk factors, and impact on patient-reported outcome and satisfaction at 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:283–291. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang JA, Scheer JK, Smith JS et al (2012) The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 71:662–669. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826100c9 (discussion 669)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith JS, Lafage V, Ryan DJ et al (2013) Association of myelopathy scores with cervical sagittal balance and normalized spinal cord volume: analysis of 56 preoperative cases from the AOSpine North America Myelopathy study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:S161–S170. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eb9e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Champain S, Benchikh K, Nogier A et al (2006) Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies. Eur Spine J 15:982–991. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0927-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rillardon L, Levassor N, Guigui P et al (2003) Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89:218–227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith JS, Lafage V, Schwab FJ et al (2014) Prevalence and type of cervical deformity among 470 adults with throacolumbar deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:1001–1009. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS et al (2013) Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications. J Neurosurg Spine 19:141–159. doi:10.3171/2013.4.SPINE12838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR (1998) Postlaminectomy kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:2738–2745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Deutsch H, Haid RW, Rodts GE, Mummaneni PV (2003) Postlaminectomy cervical deformity. Neurosurg Focus 15:E5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ames CP, Smith JS, Eastlack R, Blaskiewicz DJ, Shaffrey CI, Schwab F et al (2015) Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system. J Neurosurg Spine 1–11. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26273762

  21. Aoki Y, Nakajima A, Takahashi H et al (2015) Influence of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch on surgical outcomes of short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:213. doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0676-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Scheer JK, Passias PG, Sorocean AM et al (2015) Association between preoperative cervical sagittal deformity and inferior outcomes at 2-year follow-up in patients with adult thoracolumbar deformity: analysis of 182 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 24:1–8. doi:10.3171/2015.3.SPINE141098

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter G. Passias.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Financial information

Funding for the International Spine Study Group Foundation, through which this study was conducted, is from research grants from DePuy Spine and individual donations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jalai, C.M., Passias, P.G., Lafage, V. et al. A comparative analysis of the prevalence and characteristics of cervical malalignment in adults presenting with thoracolumbar spine deformity based on variations in treatment approach over 2 years. Eur Spine J 25, 2423–2432 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4564-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4564-7

Keywords

Navigation