Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term recurrence rates after the removal of spinal meningiomas in relation to Simpson grades

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Simpson grade II removal (coagulation of the dural attachment after gross total removal) of spinal meningioma is considered an acceptable alternative, but increased recurrence after more than 10 years has been reported. More attention must be paid to the long-term surgical outcomes after Simpson grade II removal.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed for 20 patients (M:F = 5:15; age, 59 ± 9 years) with Simpson grade II removal (mean follow-up period, 12.9 years; range 10.0–17.5). Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was conducted in 17 patients at 88 ± 52 months (range 12–157). During the same period, Simpson grade I removal (removal of the dural origin) was performed in 21 patients (follow-up, 89 ± 87 months; range 9–316). Radiological recurrence was defined as a visible tumor on a follow-up MR image, and clinical tumor recurrence was defined as the recurrence of symptoms.

Results

At the final follow-up, neurological symptoms had improved in 16/20 patients and remained stable in 4/20. A recurrent tumor was detected in one patient due to increased back pain at 92 months postoperative, but the symptom was stable without surgery until the last follow-up (124 months). The radiological and clinical recurrence-free survival periods were 150 ± 7 months (95 % CI 136–163) and 204 ± 6 months (95 % CI 193–215), respectively. There was no recurrence after Simpson grade I removal, whereas neurological deterioration occurred in two patients after surgery.

Conclusions

Simpson grade II removal may be an alternative option if the risk of complications with Simpson grade I removal is expected to be high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. King AT, Sharr MM, Gullan RW, Bartlett JR (1998) Spinal meningiomas: a 20-year review. Br J Neurosurg 12:521–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Solero CL, Fornari M, Giombini S, Lasio G, Oliveri G, Cimino C, Pluchino F (1989) Spinal meningiomas: review of 174 operated cases. Neurosurgery 25:153–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Riad H, Knafo S, Segnarbieux F, Lonjon N (2013) Spinal meningiomas: surgical outcome and literature review. Neurochirurgie 59:30–34. doi:10.1016/j.neuchi.2012.10.137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoon SH, Chung CK, Jahng TA (2007) Surgical outcome of spinal canal meningiomas. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 42:300–304. doi:10.3340/jkns.2007.42.4.300

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakamura M, Tsuji O, Fujiyoshi K, Hosogane N, Watanabe K, Tsuji T, Ishii K, Toyama Y, Chiba K, Matsumoto M (2012) Long-term surgical outcomes of spinal meningiomas. Spine 37:E617–E623. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824167f1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen-Gadol AA, Zikel OM, Koch CA, Scheithauer BW, Krauss WE (2003) Spinal meningiomas in patients younger than 50 years of age: a 21-year experience. J Neurosurg 98:258–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kayaselcuk F, Zorludemir S, Bal N, Erdogan B, Erdogan S, Erman T (2004) The expression of survivin and Ki-67 in meningiomas: correlation with grade and clinical outcome. J Neurooncol 67:209–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamasaki F, Yoshioka H, Hama S, Sugiyama K, Arita K, Kurisu K (2000) Recurrence of meningiomas. Cancer 89:1102–1110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lanzafame S, Torrisi A, Barbagallo G, Emmanuele C, Alberio N, Albanese V (2000) Correlation between histological grade, MIB-1, p53, and recurrence in 69 completely resected primary intracranial meningiomas with a 6 year mean follow-up. Pathol Res Pract 196:483–488. doi:10.1016/S0344-0338(00)80050-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maiuri F, De Caro ML, de Divitiis O, Vergara P, Mariniello G (2011) Spinal meningiomas: age-related features. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 113:34–38. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.08.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roser F, Nakamura M, Bellinzona M, Ritz R, Ostertag H, Tatagiba MS (2006) Proliferation potential of spinal meningiomas. Eur Spine J 15:211–215. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0937-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Qi ST, Liu Y, Pan J, Chotai S, Fang LX (2012) A radiopathological classification of dural tail sign of meningiomas. J Neurosurg 117:645–653. doi:10.3171/2012.6.JNS111987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prayson RA, Chamberlain WA, Angelov L (2010) Clear cell meningioma: a clinicopathologic study of 18 tumors and examination of the use of CD10, CA9, and RCC antibodies to distinguish between clear cell meningioma and metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. AIMM 18:422–428. doi:10.1097/PAI.0b013e3181dd35d2

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schaller B (2005) Spinal meningioma: relationship between histological subtypes and surgical outcome? J Neurooncol 75:157–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim CH, Chung CK (2011) Surgical outcome of a posterior approach for large ventral intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors. Spine 36:E531–E537. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dc8426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Voulgaris S, Alexiou GA, Mihos E, Karagiorgiadis D, Zigouris A, Fotakopoulos G, Drosos D, Pahaturidis D (2010) Posterior approach to ventrally located spinal meningiomas. Eur Spine J 19:1195–1199. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1295-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Setzer M, Vatter H, Marquardt G, Seifert V, Vrionis FD (2007) Management of spinal meningiomas: surgical results and a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 23:E14. doi:10.3171/FOC-07/10/E14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Klekamp J, Samii M (1999) Surgical results for spinal meningiomas. Surg Neurol 52:552–562. doi:10.1016/S0090-3019(99)00153-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Simpson D (1957) The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20:22–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee SH, Chung CK, Kim CH, Yoon SH, Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Kim ES, Eoh W, Kim HJ (2013) Long-term outcomes of surgical resection with or without adjuvant radiation therapy for treatment of spinal ependymoma: a retrospective multicenter study by the Korea Spinal Oncology Research Group. Neuro Oncol 15:921–929. doi:10.1093/neuonc/not038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sohn S, Chung CK, Park SH, Kim ES, Kim KJ, Kim CH (2013) The fate of spinal schwannomas following subtotal resection: a retrospective multicenter study by the Korea spinal oncology research group. J Neurooncol 114:345–351. doi:10.1007/s11060-013-1190-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McCormick PC, Torres R, Post KD, Stein BM (1990) Intramedullary ependymoma of the spinal cord. J Neurosurg 72:523–532. doi:10.3171/jns.1990.72.4.0523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sohn S, Chung CK (2013) Conventional posterior approach without far lateral approach for ventral foramen magnum meningiomas. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 54:373–378. doi:10.3340/jkns.2013.54.5.373

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Park SB, Jahng TA, Kim CH, Chung CK (2009) Thoracic and lumbar laminoplasty using a translaminar screw: morphometric study and technique. J Neurosurg Spine 10:603–609. doi:10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamamuro K, Seichi A, Kimura A, Kikkawa I, Kojima M, Inoue H, Hoshino Y (2012) Histological investigation of resected dura mater attached to spinal meningioma. Spine 37:E1398–E1401. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318268c419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Postalci L, Tugcu B, Gungor A, Guclu G (2011) Spinal meningiomas: recurrence in ventrally located individuals on long-term follow-up; a review of 46 operated cases. Turk Neurosurg 21:449–453. doi:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.3518-10.2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun Kee Chung.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure and funding source

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No. 2010-0028631). The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Seoul National University Hospital Clinical Research Institute (IRB No. 1306-106-500).

Additional information

On behalf of the Korea Spinal Oncology Research Group.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, C.H., Chung, C.K., Lee, SH. et al. Long-term recurrence rates after the removal of spinal meningiomas in relation to Simpson grades. Eur Spine J 25, 4025–4032 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4306-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4306-2

Keywords

Navigation