Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can MRI predict subsequent pseudarthrosis resulting from osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of short inversion time inversion-recovery (STIR) in magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the prognosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Methods

We analyzed 63 vertebrae of 56 patients who had osteoporotic vertebral fracture (Th10–L2) prospectively. Image finding of a homogeneous high signal change on a fractured vertebra was evaluated and all vertebrae were divided into “homogenous high signal change group” or “non-homogenous high signal change group”. On the other hand, image finding of linear black signal area was evaluated and all vertebrae were divided into “linear black signal area group” or “non-linear black signal area group”.

Results

Sixteen and 24 vertebrae were included in the homogenous high signal change group or the linear black signal area group, respectively. The 16 homogenous high signal change cases did not result in non-union, and 47 non-homogenous high signal change cases resulted in 14 non-unions, a significant difference. Twenty-four linear black signal area and 39 non-linear black signal area cases resulted in 10, and 4 non-unions, respectively, also a significant difference. The kyphosis progression rate of the linear black signal area group (mean 35 %) was significantly higher than that of non-linear black signal area group (mean 23 %). The visual analog scale of back pain of the linear black signal area group (mean 35 mm) was significantly higher than that of the non-linear black signal area group (mean 23 mm).

Conclusions

STIR was useful for predicting bone union, kyphosis, and back pain in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kanchiku T, Taguchi T, Kawai S (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis and new classification of the osteoporotic vertebral fracture. J Orthop Sci 8:463–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kado DM, Lui LY, Ensrud KE, Fink HA, Karlamangla AS, Cummings SR (2009) Hyperkyphosis predicts mortality independent of vertebral osteoporosis in older women. Ann Intern Med 150:681–687

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baba H, Maezawa Y, Kamitani K, Furusawa N, Imura S, Tomita K (1995) Osteoporotic vertebral collapse with late neurological complications. Paraplegia 33:281–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Milch VE, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR (2009) Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA 301:513–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ito Z, Harada A, Matsui Y, Takemura M, Wakao N, Suzuki T, Nihashi T, Kawatsu S, Shimokata H, Ishiguro N (2006) Can you diagnose for vertebral fracture correctly by plain X-ray? Osteoporos Int 17:1584–1591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spiegl UJ, Beisse R, Hauck S, Grillhosl A, Buhren V (2009) Value of MRI imaging prior to a kyphoplasty for osteoporotic insufficiency fractures. Eur Spine J 18:1287–1292

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harada A, Matsuyama Y, Nakano T, Deguchi M, Kuratsu S, Sueyoshi Y, Yonezawa Y, Wakao N, Machida M, Ito M (2010) Nationwide survey of current medical practices for hospitalized elderly with spine fractures in Japan. J Orthop Sci 15:79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsujio T, Nakamura H, Terai H, Hoshino M, Namikawa T, Matsumura A, Kato M, Suzuki A, Takayama K, Fukushima W, Kondo K, Hirota Y, Takaoka K (2011) Characteristic radiographic or magnetic resonance images of fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractures predicting potential risk for nonunion: a prospective multicenter study. Spine 36:1229–1235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanchiku T, Taguchi T, Toyoda K, Fujii K, Kawai S (2003) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Spine 28:2522–2526 (discussion 2522)

  10. Lin WC, Chen HL, Lu CH, Wang HC, Wu RW, Cheng YF, Lui CC (2011) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating intraosseous cleft formation in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures before vertebroplasty. Spine 36:1244–1250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hashidate H, Kamimura M, Nakagawa H, Takahara K, Uchiyama S (2006) Pseudoarthrosis of vertebral fracture: radiographic and characteristic clinical features and natural history. J Orthop Sci 11:28–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Niimi R, Kono T, Nishihara A, Hasegawa M, Matsumine A, Sudo A (2014) Efficacy of the dynamic radiographs for diagnosing acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 25:605–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasegawa K, Homma T, Uchiyama S, Takahashi H (1998) Vertebral pseudarthrosis in the osteoporotic spine. Spine 23:2201–2206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kanchiku T, Imajo Y, Suzuki H, Yoshida Y, Taguchi T (2014) Usefulness of an early MRI-based classification system for predicting vertebral collapse and pseudoarthrosis after osteoporotic vertebral fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech 27:E61–E65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wardlaw D, Cummings SR, Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, Tillman JB, Ranstam J, Eastell R, Shabe P, Talmadge K, Boonen S (2009) Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 373:1016–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kallmes DF, Ba Comstock, Heagerty PJ, Turner JA, Wilson DJ, Diamond TH, Edwards R, Gray LA, Stout L, Owen S, Hollingworth W, Ghdoke B, Annesley-Williams DJ, Ralston SH, Jarvik JG (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 361:569–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, Wark JD, Mitchell P, Wriedt C, Graves S, Staples MP, Murphy B (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 361:557–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Edidin AA, Ong KL, Lau E, Kurtz SM (2011) Mortality risk for operated and nonoperated vertebral fracture patients in the medicare population. J Bone Miner Res 26:1617–1626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Linn J, Birkenmaier C, Hoffmann RT, Reiser M, Baur-Melnyk A (2009) The intravertebral cleft in acute osteoporotic fractures: fluid in magnetic resonance imaging-vacuum in computed tomography? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E88–E93

  20. Theodorou DJ (2001) The intravertebral vacuum cleft sign. Radiology 221:787–788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mirovsky Y, Anekstein Y, Shalmon E, Peer A (2005) Vacuum clefts of the vertebral bodies. Am J Neuroradiol 26:1634–1640

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu CW, Hsu CY, Shih TT, Chen BB, Fu CJ (2007) Vertebral osteonecrosis: MR imaging findings and related changes on adjacent levels. Am J Neuroradiol 28:42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirotsugu Omi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omi, H., Yokoyama, T., Ono, A. et al. Can MRI predict subsequent pseudarthrosis resulting from osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures?. Eur Spine J 23, 2705–2710 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3490-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3490-9

Keywords

Navigation