Abstract
Purpose
While a considerable body of research has explored the relationship between patient expectations and clinical outcomes, few studies investigate the extent to which patient expectations change over time. Further, the temporal relationship between expectations and symptoms is not well researched.
Methods
We conducted a latent class growth analysis on patients (n = 874) with back pain. Patients were categorised in latent profile clusters according to the course of their expectations over 3 months.
Results
Nearly 80 % of participants showed a pattern of stable expectation levels, these patients had either high, medium or low levels of expectations for the whole study period. While baseline levels of symptom severity did not discriminate between the three clusters, those in the groups with higher expectations experienced better outcome at 3 months. Approximately 15 % of patients showed decrease in expectation levels over the study period and the remainder were categorised in a group with increasingly positive expectations. In the former clusters, decrease in expectations appeared to be concordant with a plateau in symptom improvement, and in the latter, increase in expectations occurred alongside an increase in symptom improvement rate.
Conclusions
The expectations of most people presenting to primary care with low back pain do not change over the first 3 months of their condition. People with very positive, stable expectations generally experience a good outcome. While we attempted to identify a causal influence of expectations on symptom severity, or vice versa, we were unable to demonstrate either conclusively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW (2001) Does how you do depend on how you think you’ll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients’ recovery expectations and health outcomes. Can Med Assoc J 165(2):174–179
Iles RA, Davidson M, Taylor NF, O’Halloran P (2009) Systematic review of the ability of recovery expectations to predict outcomes in non-chronic non-specific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 19:25–40
Verbeek J, Sengers M-J, Riemens L, Haafkens J (2004) Patient expectations of treatment for back pain: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Spine 29(20):2309–2318
Bandura A (1986) The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J Soc Clin Psychol 4:359–373
Fishbein M (1967) Attitude and the prediction of behavior. In: Fishbein M (ed) Readings in attitude theory and measurement. Wiley, New York
Vase L, Petersen GL, Riley JL (2009) Factors contributing to large analgesic effects in placebo mechanism studies conducted between 2002 and 2007. Pain 145:36–44
Bowling A, Rowe G, Lambert N, Waddington M, Mahtani KR, Kenten C et al (2012) The measurement of patients’ expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients’ expectations. Health Technol Assess 16(30):1–510
Main CJ, Foster NE, Buchbinder R (2010) How important are back pain beliefs and expectations for satisfactory recovery from back pain? Best Prac Res Clin Rheumatol 24(2):205–217
Carstens JKP, Shaw WS, Boersma K, Reme SE, Pransky G, Linton SJ (2013) When the wind goes out of the sail−declining recovery expectations in the first weeks of back pain. Eur Spine J 18(2):269–278
Kongsted A, Vach W, Axø M, Bech RN, Hestbæk L (2013) Expectation of recovery from low back pain—a longitudinal cohort study investigating patient characteristics related to expectations and the association between expectations and 3-month outcome. Spine. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000059
Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM (1999) Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain 83:157–162
Albert HB, Jensen AM, Dahl D, Rasmussen MN (2003) [Criteria validation of the Roland Morris questionnaire. A Danish translation of the international scale for the assessment of functional level in patients with low back pain and sciatica]. Danish Ugeskr Laeger 165(18):1875–1880
Kent P, Lauridsen HH (2011) Managing missing scores on the Roland Morris disability questionnaire. Spine 36:1878–1884
Muthén B, Muthén LK (2000) Integrating person-centred and variable-centred analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 24(6):882–891
Jung T, Wickrama KAS (2008) An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2(1):302–307
Clay FJ, Devlin A, Kerr E (2012) Exploring the distribution and determinants of a change in recovery expectations following traumatic injury to Victorian workers. J Occup Rehabil 23(3):318–328
Acknowledgments
AK and LH were responsible for data collection, all authors developed the protocol, SK conducted the analyses and wrote the first draft, all authors commented and contributed to successive drafts. All authors have read and approved the final version. The authors would like to thank Dr. Trynke Hoekstra for help with the latent profile analyses.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamper, S.J., Kongsted, A., Haanstra, T.M. et al. Do recovery expectations change over time?. Eur Spine J 24, 218–226 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3380-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3380-1