Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch results in increased segmental joint loads in the unfused and fused lumbar spine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASD) has been reported to occur in up to 27 % of lumbar fusion patients. A previous study identified patients at risk according to the difference of pelvic incidence and lordosis. Patients with a difference between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis >15° have been found to have a 20 times higher risk for ASD. Therefore, it was the aim of the present study to investigate forces acting on the adjacent segment in relation to pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis (PILL) mismatch as a measure of spino-pelvic alignment using rigid body modeling to decipher the underlying forces as potential contributors to degeneration of the adjacent segment.

Methods

Sagittal configurations of 81 subjects were reconstructed in a musculoskeletal simulation environment. Lumbar spine height was normalized, and body and segmental mass properties were kept constant throughout the population to isolate the effect of sagittal alignment. A uniform forward/backward flexion movement (0°–30°–0°) was simulated for all subjects. Intervertebral joint loads at lumbar level L3–L4 and L4–L5 were determined before and after simulated fusion.

Results

In the unfused state, an approximately linear relationship between sagittal alignment and intervertebral loads could be established (shear: 0° flexion r = 0.36, p < 0.001, 30° flexion r = 0.48, p < 0.001; compression: 0° flexion r = 0.29, p < 0.01, 30° flexion r = 0.40, p < 0.001). Additionally, shear changes during the transition from upright to 30° flexed posture were on average 32 % higher at level L3–L4 and 14 % higher at level L4–L5 in alignments that were clinically observed to be prone to ASD. Simulated fusion affected shear forces at the level L3–L4 by 15 % (L4–L5 fusion) and 23 % (L4–S1 fusion) more for alignments at risk for ASD.

Conclusion

Higher adjacent segment shear forces in alignments at risk for ASD already prior to fusion provide a mechanistic explanation for the clinically observed correlation between PILL mismatch and rate of adjacent segment degeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xia X-P, Chen H-L, Cheng H-B (2013) Prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine 38:597–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhu Q, Itshayek E, Jones CF, Schwab T, Larson CR, Lenke LG, Cripton PA (2012) Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 5):S599–S611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Auerbach JD, Wills BPD, McIntosh TC, Balderston RA (2007) Evaluation of spinal kinematics following lumbar total disc replacement and circumferential fusion using in vivo fluoroscopy. Spine 32:527–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim Yoon S, Minamide A, Su Kim K, Tomita K, Hutton WC (2003) Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 28:1560–1566

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmidt H, Galbusera F, Rohlmann A, Zander T, Wilke H-J (2012) Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on spine kinematics and facet joint loads in flexion and extension: a finite element analysis. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 5):S663–S674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pellet N, Aunoble S, Meyrat R, Rigal J, Le Huec JC (2011) Sagittal balance parameters influence indications for lumbar disc arthroplasty or ALIF. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):647–662

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, Le Huec J-C (2011) Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? Eur spine J 20(Suppl 5):626–633

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Galbusera F, Wilke H-J, Brayda-Bruno M, Costa F, Fornari M (2013) Influence of sagittal balance on spinal lumbar loads: a numerical approach. Clin Biomech 28(4):370–377. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.02.006

    Google Scholar 

  9. Christophy M, Faruk Senan NA, Lotz JC, O’Reilly OM (2012) A musculoskeletal model for the lumbar spine. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 11:19–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Zee M, Hansen L, Wong C, Rasmussen J, Simonsen EB (2007) A generic detailed rigid-body lumbar spine model. J Biomech 40:1219–1227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pearsall DJ, Reid JG, Livingston LA (1996) Segmental inertial parameters of the human trunk as determined from computed tomography. Ann Biomed Eng 24:198–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sato K, Kikuchi S, Yonezawa T (1999) In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. Spine 24:2468–2474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilke H-J, Neef P, Hinz B, Seidel H, Claes L (2001) Intradiscal pressure together with anthropometric data–a data set for the validation of models. Clin Biomech 16(Suppl 1):S111–S126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim K, Kim YH (2008) Role of trunk muscles in generating follower load in the lumbar spine of neutral standing posture. J Biomech Eng 130:041005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Arjmand N, Gagnon D, Plamondon A, Shirazi-Adl A, Larivière C (2009) Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models. Clin Biomech 24:533–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Rich M, Shirazi-Adl A, Arjmand N (2004) Muscle activity, internal loads, and stability of the human spine in standing postures: combined model and in vivo studies. Spine 29:2633–2642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rohlmann A, Graichen F, Kayser R, Bender A, Bergmann G (2008) Loads on a telemeterized vertebral body replacement measured in two patients. Spine 33:1170–1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, John CT, Guendelman E, Thelen DG (2007) OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54:1940–1950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ikeda E, Schenkman M, Riley P, Hodge W (1991) Influence of age on dynamics of rising from a chair. Phys Ther 71:473–481

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Krebs DE, Wong D, Jevsevar D, Riley PO, Hodge WA (1992) Trunk kinematics during locomotor activities. Phys Ther 72:505–514

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Consmüller T, Rohlmann A, Weinland D, Druschel C, Duda GN, Taylor WR (2012) Velocity of lordosis angle during spinal flexion and extension. PLoS ONE 7:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehta VA, Amin A, Omeis I, Gokaslan ZL, Gottfried ON (2012) Implications of spinopelvic alignment for the spine surgeon. Neurosurgery 70(3):707–721. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31823262ea

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2002) Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 11:80–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Granata KP, Wilson SE (2001) Trunk posture and spinal stability. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 16:650–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hadjipavlou AG, Tzermiadianos MN, Bogduk N, Zindrick MR (2008) The pathophysiology of disc degeneration: a critical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:1261–1270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lund ME, de Zee M, Andersen MS, Rasmussen J (2012) On validation of multibody musculoskeletal models. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 226:82–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Damasceno LHF, Catarin SRG, Campos AD, Defino HLA (2006) Lumbar lordosis: a study of angle values and of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs role. Acta Ortop Bras 14:193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Adams MA, Hutton WC (1981) The relevance of torsion to the mechanical derangement of the lumbar spine. Spine 6:241–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Barbir A, Godburn K, Michalek A, Lai A (2011) Effects of torsion on intervertebral disc gene expression and biomechanics, using a rat tail model. Spine 36:607–614

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim J, Yang SJ, Kim H, Kim Y, Park JB, Dubose C, Lim TH (2012) Effect of shear force on intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration: an in vivo rat study. Ann Biomed Eng 40(9):1996–2004. doi:10.1007/s10439-012-0570-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Marco Senteler, Jess G. Snedeker & Dominique A. Rothenfluh

  2. Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Marco Senteler & Jess G. Snedeker

  3. Laboratory for Mechanical Systems Engineering, EMPA, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland

    Marco Senteler & Bernhard Weisse

  4. Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, OX3 7HE, UK

    Dominique A. Rothenfluh

Authors
  1. Marco Senteler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernhard Weisse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jess G. Snedeker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dominique A. Rothenfluh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominique A. Rothenfluh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Senteler, M., Weisse, B., Snedeker, J.G. et al. Pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch results in increased segmental joint loads in the unfused and fused lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 23, 1384–1393 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3132-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3132-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation