Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Three-dimensional evaluation of volume change in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine using computed tomography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Two-dimensional imaging is not adequate for evaluating ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). This study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of a novel computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) analysis method that we had devised to measure volume changes in OPLL.

Subjects and methods

Twenty OPLL patients (12 male and 8 female; mean age 63.6 years) who were being followed conservatively were examined twice with an interval of at least 1 year between the two scans. The mean interval was 22 (range 12–45) months. A 3D model was created with DICOM data from CT images, using the MIMICS® software to calculate the volume. The mean ossification volume was determined from two measurements. Since ossification size varies widely, evaluation of change in volume is generally affected by the original size. Therefore, the change in ossification volume between the first and second CT examinations was calculated as the annual rate of progression.

Results

The type of OPLL was classified as continuous in 3 patients, segmented in 3, and mixed in 14. The mean ossification volume was 1,831.68 mm3 at the first examination and 1,928.31 mm3 at the second, showing a significant mean increase in ossification volume. The mean annual rate of lesion increase was 3.33 % (range 0.08–7.79 %).

Conclusion

The 3D method used allowed detailed OPLL classification and quantification of change in the ossified volume. Thus, this method appears to be very useful for quantitative evaluation of OPLL with only minimal measurement error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bakay L, Cares HL, Smith RJ (1970) Ossification in the region of the posterior longitudinal ligament as a cause of cervical myelopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 33:263–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jayakumar PN, Kolluri VR, Vasudev MK, Srikanth SG (1996) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine in Asian Indians: a multiracial comparison. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 98:142–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee T, Chacha PB, Khoo J (1991) Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine in non-Japanese Asians. Surg Neurol 35:40–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ogata N, Kawaguchi H (2004) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of spine (OPLL). Clin Calcium 14:42–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsunaga S, Nakamura K, Seichi A et al (2008) Radiographic predictors for the development of myelopathy in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a multicenter cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2648–2650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiba K, Yamamoto I, Hirabayashi H, Iwasaki M, Goto H, Yonenobu K, Toyama Y (2005) Multicenter study investigating the postoperative progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine: a new computer-assisted measurement. J Neurosurg Spine 3:17–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiba K, Kato Y, Tsuzuki N, Nagata K, Toyama Y, Iwasaki M, Yonenobu K (2005) Computer-assisted measurement of the size of ossification in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Orthop Sci 10:451–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hori T, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T (2006) How does the ossification area of the posterior longitudinal ligament progress after cervical laminoplasty? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2807–2812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishida H et al (2001) Progression of posterior longitudinal ligament following cervical laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1798–1802

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yonenobu K, Tsuzuki N, Nagata K, Toyama Y, Kato Y, Iwasaki M (2002) Computer-assisted measurement of ossified lesion in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. Bone 16:283–286 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Seichi A (2009) Updates on ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. Image diagnosis of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament and associated diseases. Clin Calcium 19:1426–1434 (in Japanese)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Honda O, Kawai M, Gyobu T et al (2009) Reproducibility of temporal volume change in CT of lung cancer: comparison of computer software and manual assessment. Br J Radiol 82:742–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienvenu M et al (2004) Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small non-calcified pulmonary nodules reliable? Radiology 231:453–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Revl MP, Lefort C, Bissery A et al (2004) Pulmonary nodules: preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation. Radiology 231:459–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yankelevits DF, Reeves AP, Kotis WL et al (2000) Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 217:251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Investigation Committee on OPLL of the Japanese Ministry of Public Health and Welfare (1981) The ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine (OPLL). J Jpn Orthop Assoc 55:425–440 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishida H et al (2004) Progression of posterior longitudinal ligament following en bloc cervical laminoplasty. Orthop Surg 45:192–196 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Takatsu T, Ishida Y, Suzuki K, Inoue H (1999) Radiological study of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Spinal Disord 12:271–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang H, Kong CG, Won HY, Kim JH, Park JB (2010) Inter- and intra-observer variability of a cervical OPLL classification using reconstructed CT images. Clin Orthop Surg 2:8–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomohiro Izumi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Izumi, T., Hirano, T., Watanabe, K. et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of volume change in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine using computed tomography. Eur Spine J 22, 2569–2574 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2989-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2989-9

Keywords

Navigation