Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate L5 nerve root injuries caused by outwardly misplaced S1 pedicle screws.
Summary of Background Data
Pedicle screws remain the criterion standard for fixation of L5–S1 to correct lumbosacral instability. When inserting S1 pedicle screws, it is possible to injure the L5 nerve root if screws are inserted outwardly and the tip of the screw perforates the anterior cortex of the sacrum. Despite this risk, to our knowledge this type of injury has never been reported as a case series.
Methods
We experienced 2 cases of L5 nerve root injury caused by outwardly-inserted S1 pedicle screws. In both cases, bilateral S1 pedicle screws were inserted outwardly using a free-hand technique, and on one side, screws induced severe pain by impinging on an L5 root. Computed tomography after the selective rootgraphy of the injured nerve showed the nerve compressed laterally by screw threads in Case 1 and crushed between the screw threads and the sacral body in Case 2.
Results
In both cases, leg pain disappeared immediately after the infiltration of the nerve with lidocaine, but symptoms recurred within a few days in Case 1 and within an hour in Case 2. Conservative treatment of three spinal nerve infiltrations was effective in Case 1, but reinsertion of the rogue screw was necessary in Case 2.
Conclusions
Surgeons should recognize that lateral inclination of S1 pedicle screws can cause L5 nerve root injury, which may require reinsertion of the screw, especially in cases where insertion is difficult because of overlapping surrounding muscle or bony tissue.
References
Bridwell KH, Sedgewick TA, O’Brien MF, Lenke LG, Baldus C (1993) The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 6:461–472
Mardjetko SM, Connolly PJ, Shott S (1994) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a meta-analysis of literature 1970–1993. Spine 19(Suppl):2256–2265
Yuan HA, Garfin SR, Dickman CA, Mardjetko SM (1994) A historical cohort study of pedicle screw fixation in thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spinal fusions. Spine 19(Suppl):2279–2296
Christensen FB (2004) Lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 75:2–43
Ledonio CG, Polly DW Jr, Vitale MG, Wang Q, Richards BS (2011) Pediatric pedicle screws: comparative effectiveness and safety: a systematic literature review from the Scoliosis Research Society and the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America task force. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1227–1234
Robertson PA, Plank LD (2008) Prospective cohort analysis of disability reduction with lumbar spinal fusion surgery in community practice. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:235–240
Lonstein JE, Denis F, Perra JH, Pinto MR, Smith MD, Winter RB (1999) Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1519–1528
Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Oda T, Haku T, Yamamoto T, Iwasaki M (2006) Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 4:304–309
Rivet DJ, Jeck D, Brennan J, Epstein A, Lauryssen C (2004) Clinical outcomes and complications associated with pedicle screw fixation-augmented lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 1:261–266
Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C (2007) Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine 32:E111–E120
Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, Politis AN, Arnaoutoglou CM, Karageorgos AC, Ploumis A, Xenakis TA (2012) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 21:247–255
Jacobs WC, Vreeling A, De Kleuver M (2006) Fusion for low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 15:391–402
Zhou ZJ, Zhao FD, Fang XQ, Zhao X, Fan SW (2011) Meta-analysis of instrumented posterior interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion in the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 15:295–310
Schwab FJ, Nazarian DG, Mahmud F, Michelsen CB (1995) Effects of spinal instrumentation on fusion of the lumbosacral spine. Spine 20:2023–2028
McCord DH, Cunningham BW, Shono Y, Myers JJ, McAfee PC (1992) Biomechanical analysis of lumbosacral fixation. Spine 17:S235–S243
von Strempel A, Trenkmann S, Krönauer I, Kirsch L, Sukopp C (1998) The stability of bone screws in the os sacrum. Eur Spine J 7:313–320
Lehman RA Jr, Kuklo TR, Belmont PJ Jr, Andersen RC, Polly DW Jr (2002) Advantage of pedicle screw fixation directed into the apex of the sacral promontory over bicortical fixation: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 27:806–811
Orita S, Ohtori S, Eguchi Y, Kamoda H, Arai G, Ishikawa T, Miyagi M, Inoue G, Ochiai N, Kishida S, Takaso M, Aoki Y, Takahashi K (2010) Radiographic evaluation of monocortical versus tricortical purchase approaches in lumbosacral fixation with sacral pedicle screws: a prospective study of ninety consecutive patients. Spine 35:E1230–E1237
Ergur I, Akcali O, Kiray A, Kosay C, Tayefi H (2007) The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 16:1519–1523
Esses SI, Botsford DJ, Huler RJ, Rauschning W (1991) Surgical anatomy of the sacrum: a guide for rational screw fixation. Spine 16:S283–S288
Licht NJ, Rowe DE, Ross LM (1992) Pitfalls of pedicle screw fixation in the sacrum. Spine 17:892–896
Mirkovic S, Abitbol JJ, Steinman J, Edwards CC, Schaffler M, Massie J, Garfin SR (1991) Anatomic consideration for sacral screw placement. Spine 16:S289–S294
Morse BJ, Ebraheim NA, Jackson WT (1994) Preoperative CT determination of angles for sacral screw placement. Spine 19:604–607
Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA, Wong FY, Jackson WT (1995) Morphometric evaluation of the first sacral vertebra and the projection of its pedicle on the posterior aspect of the sacrum. Spine 20:936–940
Smith SA, Abitbol JJ, Carlson GD, Anderson DR, Taggart KW, Garfin SR (1993) The effects of depth of penetration, screw orientation, and bone density on sacral screw fixation. Spine 18:1006–1010
Zheng Y, Lu WW, Zhu Q, Qin L, Zhong S, Leong JC (2000) Variation in bone mineral density of the sacrum in young adults and its significance for sacral fixation. Spine 25:353–357
Arman C, Naderi S, Kiray A, Aksu FT, Yilmaz HS, Tetik S, Korman E (2009) The human sacrum and safe approaches for screw placement. J Clin Neurosci 16:1046–1049
Okutan O, Kaptanoglu E, Solaroglu I, Beskonakli E, Tekdemir I (2004) Determination of the length of anteromedial screw trajectory by measuring interforaminal distance in the first sacral vertebra. Spine 29:1608–1611
Robertson PA, Stewart NR (2000) The radiologic anatomy of the lumbar and lumbosacral pedicles. Spine 25:709–715
de Peretti F, Argenson C, Bourgeon A, Omar F, Eude P, Aboulker C (1991) Anatomic and experimental basis for the insertion of a screw at the first sacral vertebra. Surg Radiol Anat 13:133–137
Louis R (1986) Fusion of the lumbar and sacral spine by internal fixation with screw plates with screw plates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:18–33
Robertson PA, Plank LD (1999) Pedicle screw placement at the sacrum: anatomical characterization and limitations at S1. J Spinal Disord 12:227–233
Kaptanoglu E, Okutan O, Tekdemir I, Beskonakli E, Deda H (2003) Closed posterior superior iliac spine impeding pediculocorporeal S-1 screw insertion. J Neurosurg 99(2 Suppl):29–34
Asher MA, Strippgen WE (1986) Antrhopometric studies of the human sacrum relating to dorsal transsacral implant. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:58–62
Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Mohamed A, el-Gamal H, Yeasting RA (1995) Anatomic considerations for dorsal sacral plate-screw placement. J Spinal Disord 8:352–356
Waikakul S, Chandraphak S, Sangthongsil P (2010) Anatomy of L4 to S3 nerve roots. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 18:352–355
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Inoue, M., Inoue, G., Ozawa, T. et al. L5 spinal nerve injury caused by misplacement of outwardly-inserted S1 pedicle screws. Eur Spine J 22 (Suppl 3), 461–465 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2634-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2634-z