Abstract
Introduction
Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of the several different methods to measure lumbar lordosis have been reported. However, it has not been studied sofar in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
Materials and methods
We evaluated the inter and intraobserver reliabilities of six specific measures of global lumbar lordosis in patients with AS. Ninety-one consecutive patients with AS who met the most recently modified New York criteria were enrolled and underwent anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of whole spine. The radiographs were divided into non-ankylosis (no bony bridge in the lumbar spine), incomplete ankylosis (lumbar spines were partially connected by bony bridge) and complete ankylosis groups to evaluate the reliability of the Cobb L1–S1, Cobb L1–L5, centroid, posterior tangent L1–S1, posterior tangent L1–L5, and TRALL methods.
Results
The radiographs were composed of 39 non-ankylosis, 27 incomplete ankylosis and 25 complete ankylosis. Intra- and inter-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) of all six methods were generally high. The ICCs were all ≥0.77 (excellent) for the six radiographic methods in the combined group. However, a comparison of the ICCs, 95 % confidence intervals and mean absolute difference (MAD) between groups with varying degrees of ankylosis showed that the reliability of the lordosis measurements decreased in proportion to the severity of ankylosis. The Cobb L1–S1, Cobb L1–L5 and posterior tangent L1–S1 method demonstrated higher ICCs for both inter and intraobserver comparisons and the other methods showed lower ICCs in all groups. The intraobserver MAD was similar in the Cobb L1–S1 and Cobb L1–L5 (2.7°–4.3°), but the other methods showed higher intraobserver MAD. Interobserver MAD of Cobb L1–L5 only showed low in all group.
Conclusion
These results are the first to provide a reliability analysis of different global lumbar lordosis measurement methods in AS. The findings in this study demonstrated that the Cobb L1–L5 method is reliable for measuring the global lumbar lordosis in AS.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams MA, Hutton WC (1985) The effect of posture on the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 67:625–629
Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH (1989) Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine 14:717–721
Chen YL (1999) Vertebral centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis compared with the Cobb technique. Spine 24:1786–1790
Chernukha KV, Daffner RH, Reigel DH (1998) Lumbar lordosis measurement: a new method versus Cobb technique. Spine 23:74–79
Cobb J (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instructional course lectures. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Ann Arbor, pp 261–275
Dunn G (1992) Design and analysis of reliability studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1:123–157
Genant HK, Li J, Wu CY, Shepherd JA (2000) Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: a new method for clinical assessment. J Clin Densitom 3:281–290
Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Holland B (2001) Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods. Spine 26:E235–E242
Hedman TP, Fernie GR (1997) Mechanical response of the lumbar spine to seated postural loads. Spine 22:734–743
Hong JY, Suh SW, Modi HN, Hur CY, Song HR, Park JH (2010) Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case-control study comparing six methods. Eur Spine J 19:1551–1557
Jackson RP, Kanemura T, Kawakami N, Hales C (2000) Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain. Spine 25:575–586
Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, Lee JH, Im YJ (2007) Spinal pseudarthrosis in advanced ankylosing spondylitis with sagittal plane deformity: clinical characteristics and outcome analysis. Spine 32:1641–1647
Polly DW, Kilkelly FX, McHale KA, Asplund LM, Mulligan M, Chang AS (1996) Measurement of lumbar lordosis: evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine 21:1530–1536
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428
Suk KS, Kim KT, Lee SH, Kim JM (2003) Significance of chin-brow vertical angle in correction of kyphotic deformity of ankylosing spondylitis patients. Spine 28:2001–2005
Troyanovich SJ, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Harrison DD, Harrison DE (1997) Radiographic mensuration characteristics of the sagittal lumbar spine from a normal population with a method to synthesize prior studies of lordosis. J Spinal Disord 10:380–386
Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Holland B, Janik TJ (1998) Further analysis of the reliability of the posterior tangent lateral lumbar radiographic mensuration procedure: concurrent validity of computer-aided X-ray digitization. J Manip Physiol Ther 21:460–467
van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis: a proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthr Rheum 27:361–368
Zochling J, van der Heijde D, Burgos-Vargas R, Collantes E, Davis JC, Dijkmans B Jr, Dougados M, Geher P, Inman RD, Khan MA, Kvien TK, Leirisalo-Repo M, Olivieri I, Pavelka K, Sieper J, Stucki G, Sturrock RD, van der Linden S, Vendling D, Bohm H, van Royen BJ, Braun J (2006) ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 65:442–452
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J.S., Goh, T.S., Park, S.H. et al. Radiographic measurement reliability of lumbar lordosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 22, 813–818 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2575-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2575-6