Skip to main content
Log in

Gait impairment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with age- and gender-matched healthy controls

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Gait impairment is a primary symptom of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM); however, little is known about specific kinetic and kinematic gait parameters. The objectives of the study were: (1) to compare gait patterns of people with untreated CSM to those of age- and gender-matched healthy controls; (2) to examine the effect of gait speed on kinematic and kinetic parameters.

Materials and methods

Sixteen patients with CSM were recruited consecutively from a neurosurgery clinic, and 16 healthy controls, matched to age (±5 years) and gender, were recruited for comparison. Patients and controls underwent three-dimensional gait analysis using a Vicon® motion analysis system, at self-selected speed over a 10-m track. Controls were also assessed at the speed of their CSM match.

Results

At self-selected speed, the CSM group walked significantly more slowly, with shorter stride lengths and longer double support duration. They showed significant decreases in several kinematic and kinetic parameters, including sagittal range of motion at the hip and knee, ankle plantarflexion, anteroposterior ground reaction force (GRF) at toe-off, power absorption at the knee in loading response and terminal stance, and power generation at the ankle. At matched speed, the CSM group showed significant decreases in knee flexion during swing, total sagittal knee range of motion, peak ankle plantarflexion and anteroposterior GRF.

Conclusion and implications

The findings suggested that people with CSM have significant gait abnormalities that have not been previously reported. In particular, there are key differences in the motor strategies used in the terminal stance phase of gait that cannot be explained by speed alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gough M, Shortland AP (2008) Can clinical gait analysis guide the management of ambulant children with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy? J Pediatr Orthop 28(8):879–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen G, Patten C, Kothari DH, Zajac FE (2005) Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait Posture 22(1):51–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Johnk K, Muder S, Stolze H, Mehdorn M (1999) Analysis of gait in cervical myelopathy. Gait Posture 9(3):184–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh A, Crockard HA (1999) Quantitative assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by a simple walking test. Lancet 354(9176):370–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh A, Choi D, Crockard A (2009) Use of walking data in assessing operative results for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: long-term follow-up and comparison with controls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(12):1296–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maezawa Y, Uchida K, Baba H (2001) Gait analysis of spastic walking in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy. J Orthop Sci Off J Jpn Orthop Assoc 6(5):378–384

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JH, Lee SH, Seo IS (2011) The characteristics of gait disturbance and its relationship with posterior tibial somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(8):E524–E530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Suzuki E, Nakamura H, Konishi S, Yamano Y (2002) Analysis of the spastic gait caused by cervical compression myelopathy. J Spinal Disord Tech 15(6):519–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanlon M, Anderson R (2006) Prediction methods to account for the effect of gait speed on lower limb angular kinematics. Gait Posture 24(3):280–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patrick JH (2003) Case for gait analysis as part of the management of incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 41(9):479–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Moorthy RK, Bhattacharji S, Thayumanasamy G, Rajshekhar V (2005) Quantitative changes in gait parameters after central corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2(4):418–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roislien J, Skare O, Gustavsen M, Broch NL, Rennie L, Opheim A (2009) Simultaneous estimation of effects of gender, age and walking speed on kinematic gait data. Gait Posture 30(4):441–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nurick S (1972) The Pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 95:87–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (1994) Scoring system (17–2) for cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 68:490–503

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davis R, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage J (1991) A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci 10:575–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Woltring HJ (1986) A fortran package for generalized, cross-validatory spline smoothing and differentiation. Adv Eng Softw UK 8(2):104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams G, Morris ME, Schache A, McCrory PR (2009) Incidence of gait abnormalities after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90(4):587–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McDermott A, Bolger C, Keating L, McEvoy L, Meldrum D (2010) Reliability of three-dimensional gait analysis in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Gait Posture 32(4):552–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Winter DA (1985) Concerning the scientific basis for the diagnosis of pathological gait and for rehabilitation protocols. Physiother Can 37(4):245–252

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dietz V (2002) Proprioception and locomotor disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(10):781–790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson FC, Pandy MG (2003) Individual muscle contributions to support in normal walking. Gait Posture 17(2):159–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kirtley C (2006) Clinical gait analysis: theory and practice. Churchill Livingstone, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nadeau S, Gravel D, Arsenault AB, Bourbonnais D (1999) Plantarflexor weakness as a limiting factor of gait speed in stroke subjects and the compensating role of hip flexors. Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 14(2):125–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gage J (1991) Gait analysis in cerebral palsy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cook C, Brown C, Isaacs R, Roman M, Davis S, Richardson W (2010) Clustered clinical findings for diagnosis of cervical spine myelopathy. J Man Manip Ther 18(4):175–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Health Research Board of Ireland under grant number CTPF/2008/2.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ailish Malone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malone, A., Meldrum, D. & Bolger, C. Gait impairment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Eur Spine J 21, 2456–2466 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2433-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2433-6

Keywords

Navigation