Skip to main content
Log in

Transdiscal L5-S1 screws for the treatment of adult spondylolisthesis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcome of patients treated with a modified Grob technique analysing the advantages related to increased mechanical stability.

Methods

30 patients that underwent “in situ” fusion for L5-S1 spondylolisthesis were evaluated. All patients presented a low-dysplastic developmental L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. Patients were divided into two groups: A, in which L5-S1 pedicle instrumentation associated with transsacral screw fixation was performed, and B, in which L5-S1 pedicle instrumentation associated with a posterolateral interbody fusion (PLIF) was performed.

Results

Patients treated with transdiscal L5-S1 fixation observed a faster resolution of the symptoms and a more rapid return to daily activities, especially at 3–6 months’ follow-up. The technique is reliable in giving an optimal mechanical stability to obtain a solid fusion.

Conclusions

The advantages of this technique are lower incidence of neurologic complications, speed of execution and faster return to normal life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boxall D, Bradford D, Winter R et al (1979) Management of severe spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:479–495

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bradford D (1979) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Curr Pract Orthop Surg 8:12–37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Harris IE, Weinstein SL (1987) Long-term follow-up of patients with grade III and IV spondylolisthesis. Treatment with and without posterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:960–969

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Watkins M (1953) Posterolateral fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 35:1014–1018

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris I, Weinstein S (1987) Long-term follow-up of patients with grade III and IV spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:1098–1106

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bradford D, Gotfried Y (1987) Staged salvage reconstruction of grade IV and V spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:191–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lamberg T, Remes V, Helenius I et al (2007) Uninstrumented in situ fusion for high-grade childhood and adolescent isthmic spondylolisthesis: long-term outcome. J Bone Surg Am 89:512–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdu WA, Wilber RG, Emery SE (1994) Pedicular transvertebral screw fixation of the lumbosacral spine in spondylolisthesis. A new technique for stabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:710–715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bartolozzi P, Sandri A, Cassini M, Ricci M (2003) One-stage posterior decompression-stabilization and trans-sacral interbody fusion after partial reduction for severe L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1135–1141

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grob D, Humke T, Dvorak J (1996) Direct pediculo-body fixation in cases of spondylolisthesis with advanced intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 5:281–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lamartina C, Zavatsky M, Petruzzi M, Specchia N (2009) Novel concepts in the evaluation and treatment of high-dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 18:S133–S142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pfirrmann CV, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:1873–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marchetti PG, Bartolozzi P (1997) Classification of spondylolisthesis as a guideline for treatment. In: Bridwell K, DeWald R (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 1211–1254

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vidal J, Marnay T (1983) Morphology and anteroposterior body equilibrium in spondylolisthesis L5/S1. Rev Chir Orthop 69:17–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Umehara S, Zindrick MR, Patwardhan AG et al (2000) The biomechanical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments. Spine 25:1617–1624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moller H, Hellund R (2000) Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a prospective randomized study part 1. Spine 25:1711–1715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zagra A, Giudici F, Minoia L, Corriero AS, Zagra L (2009) Long-term results of pediculo-body fixation and posterolateral fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 18:S151–S155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bohlman HH, Cook SS (1982) One-stage decompression and posterolateral interbody fusion for lumboscral spondyloptosis through a posterior approach: report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:415–418

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Proietti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Logroscino, C.A., Tamburrelli, F.C., Scaramuzzo, L. et al. Transdiscal L5-S1 screws for the treatment of adult spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 21 (Suppl 1), 128–133 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2229-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2229-8

Keywords

Navigation